Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> SECTION 2. The foregoing facts, taken together, lead the Common Council to conclude <br />that the Taxpayer has fulfilled its projected plans to construct new improvements contemplated <br />as part of the 2010 Resolution (the “Abatement”) and that its belated filing of an application <br />required to claim the benefits of the Abatement as of March 1, 2011 (for taxes due and payable <br />in 2012) was inadvertent. <br /> <br /> SECTION 3. The Common Council hereby waives the matter of noncompliance that <br />may be waived under State and local law regarding the late filing of applicable deduction <br />applications in order for the Taxpayer to claim and receive the benefit of tax Abatement on its <br />investment in new building improvements contemplated as part of the 2010 Resolution as of the <br />March 1, 2011 assessment date, all as is permitted under I.C § 6-1.1-12.1-11.3 (including <br />ND ODE <br />specific waiver that the deduction application under I.C § 6-1.1-12.1-5 be timely filed <br />ND ODE <br />with the county auditor to claim property tax abatement deductions for the 2011-Pay-2012 tax <br />year). <br /> <br /> SECTION 4. The Common Council incorporates herein by reference, and hereby <br />ratifies and reaffirms: (a) the 2010 Resolution; (b) the tax abatement application and statements <br />of benefits of the Taxpayer; and (c) the recitals of this Resolution. The Common Council and the <br />Clerk of the City of South Bend are authorized to take all such further acts and execute and <br />deliver all such further documents for the St. Joseph County Auditor or otherwise as may be <br />reasonably necessary to give effect to this Resolution, all without further application to or formal <br />action by the Common Council. <br /> <br /> SECTION 5. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage <br />and approval by the Mayor. <br /> <br /> <br /> Derek D. Dieter <br /> Member of the Common Council <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Gavin Ferlic, Vice-Chairperson, Community & Economic Development <br />Committee reported that this committee held a Public Hearing on this bill this afternoon and <br />voted to send it to the full Council with a favorable recommendation. <br /> <br />st <br />Mr. Richard Deahl, Attorney, Barnes & Thornburg LLP., 600 1 Source Bank Center, 100 N. <br />Michigan, South Bend, Indiana, made the presentation for this bill. <br /> <br />Mr. Deahl advised that he is representing Olive Cleveland Partners, LLC. He stated that they <br />kindly request the Council’s consideration of the waiver for Olive Cleveland Partners technical <br />non-compliance with a filing requirement to claim the benefit of certain tax abatement. He <br />stated that more specifically in 2010, the Council granted a five year tax abatement on Olive <br />Cleveland Partners proposed investment to construct a 80,000 square foot warehouse/distribution <br />facility on Vorden Parkway for Invacare Corp. They successfully completed construction of this <br />facility, exceeded its investment target and accommodated the relocation of Invacare Corp. and <br />resulted in its ability to retain its business and expand its workforce in South Bend and facilitated <br />the expansion of Patterson Logistics into Invacare’s former site. The new building was first <br />assessed March 1, 2011 for property taxes due this year. Due to a wholly inadvertent oversight <br />regarding coordination of tax filings, Olive Cleveland Partners learned that it filed its application <br />to claim the benefits of abatement a mere eleven (11) day after the period that such filing was <br />due. He stated that this bill would kindly request that a waiver of this non-compliance in order to <br />restore the tax abatement benefits to which Oliver Cleveland Partners would have received had it <br />timely filed the application. Mr. Deahl asked for the Council’s favorable consideration. <br /> <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to <br />this Resolution, Councilmember Varner made a motion to adopt this Resolution. <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was <br />adopted by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />