My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
June 2018
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2018
>
June 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 6:30:00 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:18:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Adam Toeri <br />From: Sandra Martin <r2d2five@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 6:47 PM <br />To: Adam Toering <br />Subject: Re: 24888 Cleveland Road <br />We were on vacation last week. The building will be 14 feet tall, 150 x60. Color will be gray with white trim, steel <br />construction. Windows will be standard size, with mutton's similar to house, white trim, like the house. Yes we will have <br />a concrete footer, and foundation in part of the building but certainly not in the riding arena. The design will be as <br />drawn, the main purpose is an indoor riding arena, and needs to be a large open building. We do not have manufacture <br />specs, they build to our needs, will try to get something before the meeting. Would like to get this project started to use <br />it as intended, for riding and training my Ponies to pull a cart in a safe confined area. Please let me know when the <br />meeting is so we can plan to attend, and we will be able to address any additional concerns at that time. Thank you. <br />On Tuesday, May 8, 2018, Adam Toering <atoering southbendin.goy> wrote: <br />Thomas, Sandra, et al — <br />I had talked with Sandra in early April about your proposed project, and we had discussed the application process and <br />the particulars of your landmark property's status. I received your application yesterday— I'm sorry I wasn't able to . <br />meet with you directly when you dropped it off, but I wanted to touch base with you regarding your submitted <br />documents. As Staff to the Historic Preservation Commission, my role is to prepare a staff report for submission to the <br />Commission for their review and decision on your proposed project. The following questions are to add clarity for that <br />report to provide context for the Commissioners in their decision-making process. I will admit, I don't always know <br />which way the Commission will vote, but I like to think I have a good idea on what questions they are most likely to ask, <br />and what their concerns might be. <br />The Commission's role, however, is to ensure that the new construction is sympathetic to the existing structures, and <br />appropriate to exist in the context of the landmarked site. They will, as I stated earlier, have difficult questions. <br />1. Is there a modular/pole barn construction design that you are styling the structure after? <br />2. Are there design documents / manufacturer's specs? <br />3. What material will the pole barn be constructed out of? <br />4. What will the enclosures or windows look like? <br />5. Will it have a concrete foundation? <br />6. How tall will the intended structure be? <br />I encourage you to be as detailed as possible with your application paperwork. As I repeatedly say, "Error on the side • <br />of too much information." As I said to Sandra, building new construction on historic landmark properties is totally <br />'doable: I trust that you will construct a beautiful, functional structure. The Staff here fully understand that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.