April 1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the City could repair the property and then seek the cost of repair from the owner. Mrs. Dempsey said that basically was the receivership program, but the City did not have the funds for this property. Commissioner Petrass inquired if the unpaid debts would prevent the owner from building a new structure. Mrs. Dempsey replied negatively. Mr. Kent inquired if the Commission could prevent Dr. Klopfer from getting a building permit President Oxian explained if the Commission denied a COA or if no COA was filed, the owner could not get any permits. Mrs. DeRose said if the new construction appeared historically appropriate, the Commission could incur a lawsuit if it denied a COA. Mr. Kent inquired if the Internal Revenue Service Building was historically appropriate. A discussion of the IRS Building ensued. Mr. Kent inquired if Dr. Klopfer would be allowed to put the IRS structure on his lot. President Oxian said he believed that would be considered inappropriate. Commissioner Hostetler explained Dr. Klopfer could put whatever he wanted in a Queen Anne style building. Mr. Andrew Greta, 1232 Lincolnway East noted there was nothing to prevent Dr. Klopfer from putting in a clinic now if he got a COA. Mr. Greta said he felt it was important to keep the issue of new construction separate from the issue that was before the Commission which was the demolition of an unsafe structure. Mr. Kent agreed with Mr. Greta that the structure needed to come - down, but he was concerned what would be the consequence of the Commission approving the demolition of the structure. President Oxian stated if Dr. Klopfer's intention was to demolish the building by neglect and not have to pay for the demolition until he tried to sell the property, he would have accomplished that, and if Dr. Klopfer's intention was to build a bigger building, he has accomplished that because if the current building is torn down that opens the property up to any structure that is appropriate by Commission standards. Commissioner Bullene noted the residual affect on historic preservation was another lost structure and the Commission demonstrating they had no recourse against demolition by neglect. Mr. Greta agreed and elaborated that property owners could do what they wanted and the Commission could do nothing to stop it. Mrs. DeRose disagreed. She said the Commission has enacted standards that require a property owner to maintain their property to certain standards. Mr. Greta inquired what the Commission had done to resolve this problem. Mrs. DeRose replied the Commission had obtained Dr. Klopfer's approval for repairs on the building and the Commission took him at his word that he would make those repairs. She explained because Dr. Klopfer did not keep his word, the Commission had come to this point. Corrurtissioner Bullene inquired if any someone or some agency were willing to put up the money, could the building be saved. Mrs. Dempsey replied that would require about $200,000. Mr. Kent said he thought it was unrealistic to think someone would invest that much money in a building they did not own and also burdensome would be the lawsuits -that would likely follow any attempt at receivership. Commissioner Hostetler inquired if members of the Historic District could sue Dr. Klopfer. Mrs. DeRose noted she did not feel Dr. Klopfer's threats of a lawsuit should be taken to seriously. She said his only- basis for a lawsuit would be due process and she felt he had been due processed more than adequately. She added that did not prevent him from filin- a lawsuit and incurring expenses on whomever was at the other end of the lawsuit, but she felt in terms of winning the lawsuit his chances were slim. President Oxian discussed the receivership program and noted the owner could not recover the house unless he paid out the receiver. Mr. Kent asked who would finance repairs on a house the borrower did riot own. President Oxian explained the bank would get it's money back even if the receivership fell