April 1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Riverside Drive was only to the plant material which may be in the area of the property line dispute. Mrs. DeRose inquired what items might be in question according to the owners of 1081 Riverside Drive. Mr. Talley noted the request had been made by the owners of 1081 that the plant material involved in the COA application be tagged. Mrs. DeRose noted there was only one proposed change that could be involved in the property line area. Mr. Duvall stated he believed items 1 and 2 were in question (Transplant a rhododendron from the rear of the garage to area of dying rhododendron near screened porch and remove sapling that is interfering with the dogwood.) Mr. Talley noted what items the owners of 1081 Riverside Drive objected to. President Oxian stated if Mr. Talley had stated earlier what specifically he objected to, the Committee would not have to had this long discussion. President Oxian said Mr. Talley's time was up and he intended to hear from Mrs. Hendriksen. Mrs. DeRose said President Oxian did have the power to set time limits. President Oxian asked to hear from Mrs. Hendriksen. Mrs. Hendriksen noted neither she nor her husband perjured themselves and that the trees had indeed been tagged for three days. She added the stakes placed by Mr. Talley's survey indicated that none of the proposed changes for 1077 Riverside Drive involved plants on the property line. She stated the plantings were approximately 2 feet from the line. President Oxian made the motion that the only items to be given a recommendation would be 1,2, and 5 because they were not under dispute. Mr. Duvall asked for clarification because the numbers in the staff report did not correspond with the numbers to which Mr. Talley was referring. Mrs. Hostetler asked for clarification on item 4 concerning the hemlock tree. She was informed the tree was on the other side of the property and was not in dispute. Mr. Talley said items 2 and 3 would be involved in the disputed area. President Oxian moved a favorable recommendation be given to items 1.4. and 5 and items 2 and 3 be postponed. The Committee voted unanimouslv in favor. Mrs. DeRose recommended in the interest of getting this resolved the owners should try to work out whether they could agreed to items 2 and 3. 2. 621 Lincolnway East - - EP -LHD -- Front porch Ms. Anderson read the staff report. President Oxian noted this was the second time this issue had been before the Commission. Ms. Pummill stated the last time her father wanted to replace the porch with a different porch but she could not get funding. Ms. Pummill reported now she just wanted to replace what needed to be replaced to meet Code Enforcement standards. President Oxian asked if Ms. Pummill had a written plan. Ms. Pummill replied negatively. President Oxian noted the standards of Code Enforcement were secondary to HPC standards and therefore would have to be fulfilled by a plan approved by the Conmiission. President Oxian asked that Ms. Pummill give the staff specific plans otherwise he would recommend some action be taken. He said :A plan could simply state what items were to be replaced in a specific way. He said this plan must be to the HPC staff before March 9, 1995 so the staff was prepared for the Code Enforcement hearing. President Oxian informed Ms. Pummill if she fulfilled HPC requirements, she would be fulfilling Code Enforcement requirements. No recommendation was made. IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes — No Quorum