My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1992
>
March 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:25 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 17 <br />problems peculiar to the creating of a historic <br />district. She had helped establish the East Wayne <br />Historic District. She noted that, although 800 of <br />E. Wayne residents initially supported the district, <br />many had later turned against it; it had, in fact, <br />barely passed_ <br />Mr. Fritz stated that the petition had only been <br />circulated to resident homeowners; it was means of <br />gauging, for Mr. Luecke's benefit, the approximate <br />level of resident homeowner support. Secondly, <br />administering the district should be viewed as a <br />separate issue from the setting of its boundaries. <br />Worrying prematurely about administrative <br />difficulties would bias the commission members' <br />judgment. <br />Mr. Herendeen asked how these two issues could <br />possibly be separated. Mr. Fritz suggested that the <br />HPC was simply underfunded; increased funding would <br />increase its administrative capacity. <br />Mr. Murray objected to the deliberate exclusion of <br />all but resident homeowners from the petitioning <br />process. Mr. Oxian explained that the petitioning <br />was part of a new, and still unfamiliar, method of <br />creating historic districts by ordinance. The thing <br />to remember, he said, was that the 90 -day review <br />period had been established to let the HPC hold a <br />hearing before sending the proposal to the Common <br />Council. Had this review period been left out of the <br />ordinance, the proposal would have entirely by passed <br />the HPC and gone straight to the Common Council. <br />Mr_ Murray again urged shelving the proposal to <br />prevent its defeat. Mr. Oxian said that, if the <br />proposal were shelved, it would not come back to the <br />HPC; it would simply go to the Common Council with a <br />favorable recommendation. If it were defeated, the <br />entire process would have to begin all over again. <br />Mr. Murray asked whether, if the bill were shelved, <br />the residents could then gather more support and <br />reintroduce the bill at a later date_ Mr. Oxian said <br />again that imposing districts by ordinance was a new, <br />unfamiliar method; also, the commission members <br />believed it necessary to demonstrate majority support <br />for the district, before giving their approval. <br />Mr. Moore asked why Harrison street had been chosen <br />as the western district boundary. Mr. Oxian said <br />Harrison -street was the boundary of a proposal made <br />five years earlier. Other residents further east had <br />then become interested in belonging to the district. <br />Mr. Moore suggested that William street had a heavier <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.