My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1992
>
March 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:25 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001404
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
page 12 <br />would help cut down on crime. <br />Presentations opposing the district then commenced. <br />Mr. Max Moore of 602 Harrison spoke first. He said <br />he had submitted a petition, with 50 signatures, <br />opposing the district. He said the city could not <br />manage so large a district. The majority of <br />properties within the boundaries were rental <br />properties. The petitioners had told him a historic <br />district would rid the neighborhood of landlords; <br />also, they had implied that funds for home repair <br />would become available if a district were declared. <br />He now knew there were no such funds. Further, he <br />thought it destructive to oppose the landlords, and <br />advocated working with them, not against them. If <br />the landlords moved out, their properties would <br />simply fall into ruin_ <br />Mr. Oxian said the district was in no way <br />anti -landlord. <br />Mr. Moore said every businessman on the stretch of <br />Lincolnway West bordering the district had signed his <br />opposing petition. Mr. Oxian pointed out that <br />Lincoln West lay outside the district boundaries. <br />Mr. Moore declared that a district would not help the <br />neighborhood. It was so crime -ridden, he said, that <br />residents were afraid to go out at night. It needed <br />sidewalks, curbs, and street signs. These basic <br />needs should be met before any talk of a historic <br />district began. Further, the area was not <br />middle-income; it was low-income. Few residents <br />could afford district standards. Thus, while he was <br />not opposed in principle to historic districts, he <br />felt his own area was a poor candidate. <br />The owner of 620 Harrison said he owned, and was <br />remodeling, three properties within the proposed <br />district. He agreed that there were prime historic <br />areas within the boundaries, and said he had <br />witnessed the neighborhood's decline over the last 17 <br />years. This decay, however, he ascribed to a lack of <br />investment capital for homeowners. Landlords <br />proliferated there because they generally invested <br />very little in their properties. Because these <br />landlords were unwilling to invest, they would simply <br />abandon their properties if standards were imposed. <br />What the neighborhood really needed, he concluded, <br />was financing, not a historic district. <br />Mr. Oxian said that, in other districts, landlords <br />had so far complied with standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.