Laserfiche WebLink
Community Workshop <br />The Sout Bend Project Initiation Workshop was conducted by the consultant team on May 5, <br />1988. Pa tic ipants included the project director, key personnel from the consultant team, staff <br />working irectly on the assignment, and members of the Study Committee. <br />The purp es of the workshop were to review the overall project objectives, refine the work <br />program, esolve any questions regarding contract interpretations, and establish a firm basis for <br />all partici ants to work together in completing the assignment. <br />To identify first -hand impressions about the strengths and weaknesses of the Near Westside <br />Neighbor food, a bus tour was given prior to the meeting. While touring, the consultants took <br />field notes of participants' on -site observations and perceptions. In addition, a four -part ques- <br />tionnaire was distributed to each individual at the meeting. <br />In the qu stionnaire, each participant was asked to: <br />1) identify the five most important issues facing the Near Westside Neighborhood; the de- <br />gree of consensus among group members was assessed; <br />2) identify the one issue he /she thought no one else would mention so that sensitive or <br />otherwise overlooked issues could be elicited; <br />3) identify three major assets of the area for determining strengths to be built upon in the <br />development program; and <br />4) rank the three most important issues facing the area from a master list compiled with <br />participants' review and comment. <br />The resul s of the questionnaires and the discussion from the workshop were tabulated. The <br />general c tegories of issues identified are similar to those which emerged during the key person <br />interview . These categories appear as prioritized by the workshop participants: <br />1. Crime <br />2. Residents' apathy and sense of pessimism/ hopelessness <br />3. No capital for projects <br />4. Lack of investment incentives <br />5. Poor perception of community by residents and non - residents <br />6. Ci y administrators' lack of commitment to the area <br />7. U iemployment in the area <br />8. Dr ug sales and use <br />9. DE terioration of the area's environment <br />10. Ned for clean -up and maintenance <br />11. R d- lining by loan agencies <br />12. H rmful effects of zoning ordinances on area <br />13. Small business failings and closings in the area <br />14. Falling property values <br />15. No resident support for education <br />16. Dismal marketability of area <br />Field Reconnaissance Surveys and Analysis <br />The cons <br />sance sur <br />ings with <br />and zonii <br />iltant team used base materials prepared by the City and conducted field reconnais- <br />ievs to ascertain the land -use relationships and locations of vacant parcels and build - <br />n the study area. Also, an urban design analysis and an analysis of land -use conflicts <br />g conflicts were undertaken. The results of these analyses are recorded on a set of <br />6l <br />