Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br /> Regular Meeting—August 28, 2012 <br /> 2. NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. South Side Development Area <br /> (1) continued... <br /> barriers would be installed. The <br /> traffic now is so bad that she can't <br /> sleep at night. Mr. Durr explained <br /> that under Option A her home would <br /> be further away from the road. With <br /> options B and D the majority of the <br /> traffic is going up the new Walter <br /> Street to Barbie, not on Fellows, so <br /> she should see a reduction in traffic. <br /> • A gentleman likes Option C for that <br /> reason alone. <br /> • Woman asked if sidewalks would be <br /> put in with the Option C plan. Mr. <br /> Durr said there is a plan all ready to <br /> go to have a bike path extend from <br /> Miami to Fellows. Mr. Schalliol <br /> added that one of the acquisition <br /> issues the city has with C is that to get <br /> from Fellows to Michigan, we'd have <br /> to do property acquisition to put a <br /> sidewalk in on the north side of <br /> Ireland. One of the pieces that the <br /> city doesn't have as a cost in there is <br /> the right of way acquisition necessary <br /> for the sidewalk all the way on the <br /> north side of Ireland. <br /> • Woman says she doesn't understand <br /> any of this and she doesn't care about <br /> anything else. All she knows that she <br /> may or may not lose her house. Can <br /> someone tell her whether they will be <br /> losing their homes? <br /> • Gentleman took objection to her <br /> saying safety wasn't an issue she was <br /> concerned about. He is most <br /> concerned about the safety of <br /> 15 <br />