Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 <br /> ®CITY OF SOUTH BEND ' OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> individuals to share some more details on this. The County would then contribute this amount that <br /> we're contributing towards double tracking towards the cost of a new station which would be <br /> within the corporate limits of South Bend. The Redevelopment Commission has also in recent <br /> weeks,signed an agreement with NICTD to maintain a station in South Bend for a period of twenty <br /> (20)years.The bond issuance schedule is roughly as follows.We began with an update to Council <br /> on the 23rd. The Redevelopment Commission adopted resolutions and set public hearings on the <br /> 26th. We've had MOU's signed on the 10th. And today we're here for the bond lease resolution, as <br /> read by the Clerk. I'm going to invite Mike Nolan from NICTD to share a few words about the <br /> project followed by Mark Pascarella from IFA. And then finally, Phil Faccenda to share a few <br /> details about the bond. Thank you. <br /> Mike Nolan, 33 East US Highway 12, Chesterton, IN, served as a presenter for this bill. Mr. Nolan <br /> stated,Thank you. I appreciate being before the Council again tonight.We were here before earlier, <br /> so I'll try to make it brief. We've talked about this double track program for a while. This is a <br /> seminal moment, we are just about to get all of our funding together. We're right before the FTA <br /> right now seeking an all-important entry into their engineering phase to get the project advanced <br /> towards a full funding grant agreement. Jitin did a great job of assessing the benefits. We're going <br /> to triple ridership out of South Bend. South Bend is where we started to look at this double track. <br /> Ninety (90) minutes, ninety (90) miles downtown South Bend or South Bend to Chicago. I <br /> mentioned the downtown stop in South Bend, and we are certainly studying the station location. <br /> But that is not part of what we're talking about today. In order to determine where we're going to <br /> ultimately be in South Bend, we first (1St) need to clear the way further to the west and make the <br /> travel times quicker. That's what this project does. We advanced this project in June of this year <br /> to the FTA with the State funding approval by the State budget committee. I just heard from the <br /> head of the FTA a few weeks ago when we got our West Lake project into engineering,that double <br /> track and her mind is right on the heels. So, this is a very important element of the project. In <br /> addition to this, we also made a commitment to not only Michigan City but to South Bend, that <br /> we will maintain service for a minimum of two (2) decades from the last point in time that money <br /> is spent from South Bend on the improvements for the railroad. That is not any way shape or form <br /> a suggestion that we're looking at not running a service at any particular point in time. But it does <br /> give you some assurance that the monies you're going to put into this railroad will be here for a <br /> minimum of several decades to come, if not much longer than that. Thank you. <br /> Mark Pascarella, Indiana Finance Authority, 1 North Capital, Indianapolis, IN, served as a <br /> presenter for this bill. Mr. Pascarella stated, I'm going to go through three (3) very quick points <br /> with you. Point number one (1) is to talk about the original financing plan. When this was <br /> originally constructed,it was supposed to be fifty percent(50%)federal grants. Fifty percent(50%) <br /> is what the federal agencies would consider is local funds. Of that fifty percent,(50%) fifty percent <br /> (50%)was going to be from the State.The other half was going to come from the four(4)counties: <br /> Lake, Porter, St. Joseph and LaPorte Counties. And those were going to come in at eighteen and a <br /> quarter percent (18.25%) each. Subsequently, as we moved forward, we really started to dig deep <br /> into this project and a couple things happened. Number one (1) is we really started getting <br /> estimates of how much it was going to cost and it was a little bit more than that 50/50 split I <br /> discussed on the local share. Also, the Federal Government at that point decided that rather than <br /> doing a 50/50 split, they're going to do a 62/38 split. And, of course, for Federal Government <br /> reasons,they want the thirty-eight percent(38%)and they want to put the sixty-two percent(62%) <br /> on the locals in the State as well. When that happened obviously that shifts cost dramatically on to <br /> the State and local areas. So, at that point during the last session, the IFA, Northwest Regional <br /> EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY INNOVATION 1 INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend.Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f574.235.9173 TTD574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 2 <br />