Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING March 11, 2019 <br /> unfortunate that another site could not be identified. I also heard it wasn't just about finding a <br /> reasonable site but also the cost factor. So, as we move forward, I think that we, as a Council, as <br /> we continue to look at zoning and special exceptions, we need to have a different level of <br /> conversation to look at all these areas. We may not agree,but hopefully it's not on a personal level. <br /> At this time, I will not be supporting the petitioner's request. <br /> Councilmember Sharon L. McBride requested Clerk Fowler clarify, for the record, the written <br /> commitments. <br /> City Clerk Kareemah Fowler stated,Just to clarify,there were two(2)sets of written commitments. <br /> The second(2nd) set of written commitments was for Choices and Choices is the primarylocation. <br /> So, that is the primary location and a lot of the people that came to the last Council meeting were <br /> concerned about the Choices and the current activities going back and forth. That is why there <br /> were two (2) sets of written commitments because Council Members asked questions about them. <br /> The group of individuals from Walnut Grove and then some of my neighbors, their parents live at <br /> Walnut Grove.The separate meeting Alicia had was where the two(2)sets of written commitments <br /> came from. They met several times. We met this past Friday. One(1)set of commitments were for <br /> Choices and the other set were for the site in question. Alicia and her team met with all of my <br /> neighbors and the individuals at Walnut Grove. I think some of this confusion comes from when <br /> we ran out of time at the last Committee Meeting. <br /> Councilmember Tim Scott stated, I'm going to be consistent with my special exceptions as I have <br /> in the past, especially one (1) large one (1) we had last year. I do want to say that I appreciate the <br /> petitioners coming forth. If this does not go forward, I suggest you work with DCI as well. <br /> Sometimes working with our department of Community Investment can make these things go a <br /> lot smoother up front. At times, a lot of expectations are put out before understanding the full <br /> process and how things are handled with Council. So, I encourage you to do that if this doesn't go <br /> forward. At this point, it is not against anything you are doing. We commend everything that is <br /> being done. As I've said, in other special exceptions, if this does not pass, please work with DCI <br /> to look at other options. That is crucial because if you continue to work, getting over that hurdle <br /> will happen, I'm sure. <br /> Councilmember Regina Williams-Preston made a motion to send Bill No. 69-18 to the full Council <br /> with a favorable recommendation.Councilmember Jake Teshka seconded this motion which failed <br /> by a roll call vote of three(3) ayes and five(5)nays (Councilmember Jo M. Broden, Oliver Davis, <br /> John Voorde, Karen White, Tim Scott). <br /> Councilmember John Voorde then made a motion to send Bill No. 69-18 to the full Council with <br /> an unfavorable recommendation. Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded this motion which <br /> carried by a roll call voice of five(5)ayes and three(3)nays(Councilmember Jake Teshka,Regina <br /> Williams-Preston, Sharon L. McBride). <br /> RISE AND REPORT <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to rise and report to full Council. Councilmember <br /> Regina Williams-Preston seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight(8) ayes. <br /> REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED <br /> Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend reconvened in the Council <br /> Chambers on the fourth floor of the County-City building at 9:20 p.m. Council President Tim Scott <br /> presided with eight (8)members present. <br /> BILLS —THIRD READING <br /> BILL NO. <br /> 69-18 THIRD READING ON AN ORDINANCE <br /> AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND <br /> 22 <br />