Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 9, 2012 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />nine member commission two of whom are disabled. The Commission also serves as <br />also in a quasi-judicial capacity meaning that it is somewhat like a court. It holds <br />reconsideration hearings about once a month, public hearings two, three and sometimes <br />four times a year, and of course the public meetings of the Human Rights Commission <br />each month. The clients of the Human Rights Commission are generally low income and <br />generally do not have transportation and it is essential that there be a good functioning <br />conference room in which the necessary public hearings which require confidentiality <br />and privacy are held. Those that have claims of discrimination, their claims are protected <br />as a matter of federal law. The Human Rights Commission can not release any <br />information about investigations so the privacy of those who have claims who may be in <br />vulnerable positions is essential. With that in mind, then there are five (5) distinct <br />requirements of the Human Rights Commission and say distinct because they are unlike <br />any other department. 1. Must have approximately 3,000 square feet of space usable as <br />an office. 2. That it be a totally ADA accessible facility, because they hear cases of <br />those with disabilities and because members of the commission themselves are disabled. <br />3. It needs to be on a first floor, for the same reasons. 4. It needs to be a place that <br />enhances the privacy of individuals who are the clients of the commission. 5. It needs to <br />be on a Public Transportation Route with parking facilities. All of those requirements are <br />met with the space that has been identified here. She stated that the other component of <br />the Human Rights Commission is that it receives about 1,000 inquiries a year, of which <br />about 100 turn into actual cases that are worked on involving witnesses and clients. So, <br />for those reasons it’s clear that a finding for a new facility is necessary in addition to all <br />of the problems that are with the space as it is presently constituted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis asked how the new location will be marketed. How would <br />people be able to find the Human Rights Commission on Niles Avenue? How will the <br />rest of the world know that the Human Rights Commission has relocated to Niles <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Lonnie Douglas stated that the HUD has given them an $80,000 grant to do <br />education and outreach. Part of that grant will be utilized to advertise the billboards, <br />television spots, newspaper spots that the Human Rights Commission is moving and <br />where they will be located and how accessible they will be. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis asked if they were going to use that total amount of the <br />grant for marketing purposes? He stated that he didn’t know anything about an $80,000 <br />grant to be honest. <br /> <br />Mr. Douglas stated that the grant is given to them three (3) fold: 1. The Council passed <br />the sexual orientation law, an ordinance that they will also be marketing in terms of <br />making people aware of that. 2. Housing in general, that they investigate housing in <br />terms of landlords as well as homeowners. 3. To announce that they are moving. <br /> <br />Ms. DeRose advised that much of the funding for the Human Rights Commission is <br />provided by grants from the EEOC and from the Housing and Urban Development <br />Department of the Federal Government. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dieter asked for clarification on the exact dollar amount of the grant. <br /> <br />Ms. DeRose stated that it was $80,000. <br /> <br />Ms. DeRose stated that she made a mistake when she identified the owner of the <br />building, it’s 319 Niles Avenue LLC. <br /> <br />A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time. <br /> <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to this Resolution, Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to adopt this <br />Resolution as substituted. Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried and <br />the Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes. <br /> <br /> 10 <br /> <br />