Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> So,this is three(3)tax abatements. We have done stacks, if you will,of tax abatements in the past. <br /> Liberty Tower is an example. The reasons we did this was, one (1), we really want them to come <br /> into town and invest in the neighborhood. We also wanted to make this worthwhile. When we <br /> stack all these up, it will be just over $213,000 of phased-in benefit for them. They are making <br /> some really significant investments in a building that is otherwise crumbling infrastructure within <br /> the community. We want to assist that however we can. So, we are stacking a vacant building tax <br /> phase-in, a real property phase-in and the personal property tax phase-in. The subject property is <br /> right here(referencing a presentation which is available in the City Clerk's Office)where the curb <br /> starts. There are actually two (2) parcels there. One (1) is with the building that is about 73,000 <br /> square feet. Another small parcel totals to about eight and a half(8.5) acres. It has been vacant for <br /> quite a few years now. The purchase price is $765,000. They are going to put in at least$500,000 <br /> for renovating the building itself There are renderings that were shared with me today. Their <br /> business has to do with adding value to rolled steel and reselling that. You can see with the <br /> condition of the building, there is a lot of roofing and tuck-pointing work that needs to be done. <br /> The vegetation is out of control. You can see (referencing the presentation) the result of leaks and <br /> the need for restoration. <br /> Councilmember Jake Teshka arrived at the meeting at 4:03 p.m. <br /> Mr. Buckenmeyer continued, On the personal property side, this (referencing a slide in the <br /> presentation)just gives you a quick picture of some of the tools they will be utilizing. They will <br /> be processing and adding value to rolled or sheet steel by sheering it into different sizes or doing <br /> laser cutting. That is about $700,000 worth of personal property and capital equipment that we <br /> also want to support bringing in. The real meat of it is, right now, the current state of the property <br /> as an assessed value is about $550,000. The annual tax bill has been about $20,000 a year. With <br /> their total private investment of over $2 million and a commitment to sixteen (16) new full-time <br /> jobs with good salaries and hourly rates, over the next four(4) years, as well as retaining four(4) <br /> existing jobs, we are recommending the levels of support noted here (referencing a slide in the <br /> presentation). The phase-ins on the vacant building would be just about $105,000, on the real <br /> property they would be about $68,000 and the equipment would have about $40,000 in abated <br /> value. They will still be paying about$55,000 over that time.And,when we look at a ten(10) year <br /> window and we talk about the payback or a break even, within that ten (10) years, with a tax <br /> abatement, we will still see a larger return in terms of the tax revenue from this building than if <br /> there was no action. And keep in mind, at no action, that number is still ambitious because if there <br /> is no action on the tax abatement,there is no action on the building. That taxable value is not likely <br /> to stay in a straight line as the building will continue to develop leaks and other issues. That would <br /> lower its value. This is a win-win financially. It is a win-win for the neighborhood and we think it <br /> is great to get this building back into use. This will encourage additional development with the <br /> neighbors and, again, these renderings are some examples of what it may look like. There are a <br /> couple different concepts but they are really looking to clean up the outside as well as the inside. <br /> It will be the headquarters for their company. <br /> Councilmember John Voorde asked, Do you know if the Assessor's Office has functional <br /> obsolescence applied to the discount in assessed value due to its vacancy? And if so, when you <br /> calculate these numbers, I wonder if you're using the current one (1) which would reflect <br /> obsolescence, and it would come off <br /> EXCELLENCE j ACCOUNTABILITY INNOVATION INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f 574.235.9173 TTD 574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 2 <br />