12-10-18 Utilities - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•CITYOFSOTJTHBENDTCommitteeChairTeshkaOFFICE stated, IOF just HE CLERK wanted to ask about what Councilmember Voorde said. Typically when folks hear the term income-based, they think of tiers based on income, right? Especially with a user fee like this, it gets real money real quick by saying if you make under this amount, you pay this or you pay nothing. I would like to see more of an assistance program or an exemption, so I wouldn't take that off the table. I would also like to say, too,just to put out there, this is not going to solve our flooding issues. We've got a lot more. This just barely scratches the surface as far as infrastructure goes. This is specifically for storm water and we are going to have to address some of those things coming up like CSO and those types of things. We're going to have to find some money and I think this is something we can bond against. I don't know and we will have to cross that bridge when it comes but we definitely have some stuff to do. Committeemember Regina Williams-Preston stated, I really like that idea. Since this is just a two (2) year kind of a trial, is it something that wouldn't be hard to do to add in that we could have an exemption for this trial period as well? Mr. Horvath replied, I would have to look into how that is formulated. Our thought was that we would get income-based rates to be our assistance program and that is how we would end up setting those. It wouldn't be necessarily just for seniors but for anybody whose income qualifies. I think the challenge is trying to figure out the most uncomplicated way as possible, in that regard. There will be some rate sensitivities we will have to look at. We will have to make some assumptions about how many people would qualify for the program. Ultimately when we go to income-based rates, it will be a revenue neutral scenario. It will mean there will be some of us paying more and some paying less. That is how the structure will work. Committeemember Williams-Preston followed up, I guess what I'm thinking is we are going to know about the income-based. What I heard was by June 1, we would have a proposal that the City would bring to Council. That doesn't mean it will start then. The Council might look at that but then you still have to deal with the State, right? That's a whole other process. My thought was since we're doing this two (2) year kind of pilot or stop gap, maybe we could try out this model and after two (2) years we could assess that and see how that worked and decide if that is the way to go. Again, I don't know how hard that would be. Councilmember Voorde interjected, The Auditor has got some sort of verification process. I don't know what it is but it works for them. Committeemember Williams-Preston made a motion to send Bill No. 61-18 to the full Council with an unfavorable recommendation. Committeemember Davis seconded this motion which failed by a voice vote of two (2) ayes and two (2) nays (Committeemember Teshka and Committeemember McBride). Council President Tim Scott broke the tie with a nay vote. Committeemember Williams-Preston then made a motion to send Bill No. 61-18 to the full Council with no recommendation. Committeemember McBride seconded this motion which carried by a voice vote of three(3) ayes and one (1) nay(Committeememeber Davis). With no further business, Committee Chair Teshka adjourned the Utilities Committee meeting at 4:59 p.m. EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY INNOVATION I INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT 455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 1 p 574.235.9221 f 574.235.9173 TTD574.235.5567 www.south bend in.goy 8