My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-12 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
04-10-12 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2012 11:21:53 AM
Creation date
4/25/2012 11:21:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br /> Regular Meeting—April 10, 2012 <br /> 6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> D. West Washington-Chapin Development Area <br /> (1) continued... <br /> Washington TIF is broke. Mr. Inks said that <br /> the area generates about $400,000 in TIF <br /> each year. The TIF designation does not <br /> have an expiration date. The next priority <br /> will be the Rushton Apartments. <br /> Mr. Downes made a motion to approve No ACTION TAKEN <br /> Resolution No. 3016. Mr. Varner seconded <br /> the motion. The vote was two in favor, one <br /> against. <br /> Mr. Metiever noted that the item will be <br /> brought back to the Commission at its next <br /> meeting. No action was taken today because <br /> the concurrence of three members is <br /> necessary to approve or disapprove of action. <br /> E. South Side Development Area <br /> (1) Relocation Agreement with American <br /> Electric Power for the Main-Lafayette <br /> Connector Project. <br /> Mr. Schalliol noted that the Relocation <br /> Agreement is for the relocation of facilities in <br /> and adjacent to the Main-Lafayette <br /> Connector project. While the roadway was <br /> designed to minimize impacts to AEP and <br /> other utilities, there still remained several <br /> points of intersect with both the transmission <br /> and the distribution network. For those <br /> service points in easements, the party causing <br /> the conflict is required to pay relocation and <br /> where no easement exists, AEP covers the <br /> expense. <br /> 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.