Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING October 8, 2018 <br /> Councilmember Karen White stated, Are there any areas we need to have further discussion on? <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis stated,Yes,thank you Ms. White. I sent out a letter on Friday to Ms. <br /> Hockenhull which I will read for the record. It says, `Greetings, Ms. Hockenhull. Please kindly <br /> note that as was publicly discussed during the last South Bend Common Council Z&A Committee <br /> meeting on September 24th, 2018, there was an earnest concern about moving forward with the <br /> approval of a budget that includes terms to get the City of South Bend Zoning Board into 2019 <br /> tentatively scheduled to commence during the summer of 2019. Our last South Bend Common <br /> Council Committee highlighted some of the many issues which need to be worked out prior to the <br /> funding of the City of South Bend Zoning Board taking place including the creation and the review <br /> of the City of South Bend's ordinance. As in many other previous City matters, when all of the <br /> immediate concerns have been resolved, a request can be made by the City of South Bend <br /> Administration to the South Bend Common Council seeking to appropriate funds at a later day. <br /> Henceforth, it is being requested to proceed with the City of South Bend's budget without this <br /> action being funded with the 2019 City budget. Further meetings will be proposed to have this <br /> discussion so that we can properly proceed with the discussion at the City level.' <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis continued, An example of that, you can see this afternoon. Zoning <br /> and Annexation issues have come before this Council and they are probably some of the most <br /> challenging and heated issues we deal with. There are a lot of things I am for and that I have <br /> publicly stated in the August South Bend Tribune that I see the need for this. I just would like to <br /> have seen that worked out. To fund something and then come back and do it around doesn't make <br /> sense to me. I understood that the Council President has shared his disagreement with this concept <br /> but I believe that we need to keep the control right here. Our statutory obligation is to be in control <br /> of the budget. For us to put parameters and do that, we've stated those kinds of things before but I <br /> don't see too many examples when we have come back to really have those kinds of things. I <br /> believe that we have had a pattern of too many major issues that we have dealt with Community <br /> Investment that we have found out regarding this at an Area Plan meeting or at a later date that we <br /> have to come back to clean up. I believe that we can really take the time to come together and work <br /> out the plan. We just had a highlight. If I had not initiated that highlight from our last meeting, it <br /> wouldn't have happened. It would have only been in the budget and moved on and then later on. I <br /> think we can do better than that. This does not stop us from saying that this idea is not there but it <br /> gives us the opportunity, here as a Council,to work out things. We can appropriate funds. I think <br /> given the fact that we need to look at the impact of eight(8) of the nine (9) members coming from <br /> the Mayor's Office. Of course we still have one (1) from the City Council, we need to look at the <br /> impact of the legalities of that. I asked,in the first(1St)budget meeting,Ms. Stephanie Steele,what <br /> the legalities were going to be with that. I never got a response back. I even never got a response <br /> back, I know it's Friday but they could still send me something back and say we heard your <br /> concerns or something but I never got a response back even from the Administration on this <br /> question and from that standpoint. So,we are in a situation where, as your Zoning and Annexation <br /> Chair,I don't get responses back. I went to an Area Plan meeting and we found out we had farmers <br /> out there, didn't get a response back from that. So these are the kinds of things, it's not just a <br /> personal Oliver Davis versus the Administration issue, this is something that affects us all and I <br /> think that we need to have this major kind of piece carved out and handled. We can have <br /> discussions with our Zoning and Annexation Committee. We can do that. It doesn't take us long. <br /> Dr. Mueller himself said that ordinance wouldn't take long. And so therefore, I don't understand <br /> it wasn't presented prior to this time. It has not been done. We need to have more strength instead <br /> of handing everything over to the Administration. I even have concerns with our current President <br /> voting for everything else for the Administration, but when it comes to Council, votes against the <br /> budget. We have to learn how to respect the Council's response and give teeth to the Council and <br /> not just be seen as a rubber stamp for all of those kinds of things. This is one (1) of the key things <br /> that we have to look at from that standpoint. I appreciate it and I would ask for your support to <br /> delay, and I even make a recommendation and a formal motion to pull that out of this budget at <br /> this present time and then come back, after enough discussion and this Council approves it,would <br /> then appropriate the funds to proceed given the nature of that. I make that motion. <br /> This motion failed due to the lack of a second. <br /> 15 <br />