Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING September 10, 2018 <br /> project. And you're saying the projects aren't going to happen if we don't give the abatements. <br /> Projects happened prior to abatements and TIF dollars. We need to be conscience about what we're <br /> doing with these abatements, and how steadily they've climbed. They can show all the graphs up <br /> here that they want, but we can show graphs of where all of the abatements have had a steady <br /> incline as well. Then you look at the AJ Wright building, we put a lot of money into that place. <br /> We gave tax abatements and they bailed. They didn't have to pay anything, and we sold the place <br /> for pennies on the dollar and never gained anything back. That's happening over and over again. <br /> If we continue to keep voting these through,then you want to sit up here and vote to reduce money <br /> for neighborhood projects,that's just wrong, that's not what we elected you folks to do. <br /> President Scott opened the floor for a rebuttal from Mr. Mueller. <br /> Mr.Mueller stated,Just to remind people that we are not talking about the loss of any tax revenues. <br /> The Hall of Fame, if this development was going to happen,we'd have something in there already. <br /> These developments are difficult, our market is still not quite there. One(1)of the folks mentioned <br /> that there may be issues with penciling out. This really shows the need for incentives in our market, <br /> where we're not going to see this level of investment. Incentives help fill that gap. We can do it <br /> with tax abatements, TIF, or a combination. We're trying to move more toward using tax <br /> abatements, because we'd like to use TIF for other things like parks, neighborhood plan <br /> implementation and public works capital. But again, Liberty Tower is a good base. We'd either be <br /> tearing it down, spending TIF dollars to demolish that building, or it would be falling apart in the <br /> middle of our downtown if it weren't for finding a developer who is willing to take the risk and <br /> put tens of millions of dollars into it, asking for tax phase in, because that's the more appropriate <br /> way to characterize this incentive. As the investment goes into it, the new tax, only on the new <br /> part, is phased in. We'll just let the results speak for themselves. I hope that we can continue this <br /> progress for the City. <br /> Councilmember Gavin Ferlic, stated, It is ok to talk about tax abatements as a whole, but I just <br /> want to remind Council and the public that we are just talking about extending the designation <br /> period. We're not talking about amending these at all, except for extending that period so it can <br /> keep up with the lag in assessments. <br /> Councilmember Gavin Ferlic made a motion to adopt Bill No. 18-42. Councilmember Jo M. <br /> Broden seconded the motion which carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) ayes (Councilmember <br /> Davis). <br /> 18-43 A RESOLUTION MODIFYING AND <br /> RECONFIRMING THE ADOPTION OF <br /> DECLARATORY RESOLUTION NO. 4467-15 <br /> DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE <br /> CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br /> COMMONLY KNOWN AS 122 CALLANDER <br /> ST. SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 AN ECONOMIC <br /> REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF <br /> A (6) SIX YEAR REAL PROPERTY TAX <br /> ABATEMENT FOR JSK DEVELOPMENT, <br /> INC./IRELAND HOSPITALITY, LLC <br /> Councilmember Gavin Ferlic made a motion to adopt Bill No. 18-43. Councilmember Jake Teshka <br /> seconded the motion which carried by a roll call vote of seven(7) ayes (Councilmember Davis). <br /> 18-44 A RESOLUTION MODIFYING AND <br /> RECONFIRMING THE ADOPTION OF <br /> DECLARATORY RESOLUTION NO. 4467-15 <br /> DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE <br /> CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br /> COMMONLY KNOWN AS 121 SOUTH ST. <br /> JOSEPH ST., SOUTH BEND, IN 46601 AN <br /> 10 <br />