Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — February 18, 2005 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />I. Bid Openings <br />(1) continued... <br />Ms. Greene advised with respect to the <br />proposal submitted by A. J. Patel, that the <br />proposal is properly signed; the statement of <br />qualifications of financial responsibility, the <br />statement for public disclosure and the <br />affidavit of non - collusion have been <br />submitted. The bid is complete. <br />Ms. Greene advised with respect to the <br />second bid submitted by Scioto Development <br />Company the proposal is complete with the <br />exception of the performance guaranty. The <br />proposal forms are executed; the affidavit of <br />non - collusion, the statement of qualifications <br />of financial responsibility and the statement <br />for public disclosure are included. However, <br />Ms. Greene again noted that there was no <br />performance guarantee submitted with the <br />proposal. <br />Mr. King advised that the performance <br />guarantee related to the Scioto Development <br />Company bid should be addressed further <br />with Scioto Development by staff. <br />Upon a motion by Mr. Hunt, seconded by <br />Mr. Downes and unanimously carried, the <br />Commission referred the proposal from A. J. <br />Patel to staff for further action. <br />Upon a motion by Mr. Hunt, seconded by <br />Mr. Downes and unanimously carried, the <br />Commission referred the proposal submitted <br />by Scioto Development Company to staff for <br />further action. <br />qh� 26 <br />COMMISSION REFERRED THE PROPOSAL FROM <br />A. J. PATEL TO STAFF FOR FURTHER ACTION. <br />COMMISSION REFERRED THE PROPOSAL <br />SUBMITTED BY SCIOTO DEVELOPMENT <br />COMPANY TO STAFF FOR FURTHER ACTION. <br />