Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2006 <br />have proposed, the retail space, the hotel, and how they will impact the quality of her life, <br />in a residence that she bought specifically to be close to the University, which her <br />husband works at, and her son goes to school at. But, to still enjoy the quite serenity, of a <br />neighborhood, a residential neighborhood. Throughout the planning period, for several <br />years, she has asked the question on numerous occasions unfortunately the University has <br />changed people who have been in charge of this so, she has gotten several different <br />responses depending on who she has talked to as to what safeguards are going to be in <br />place for the residential area that is planned there. Predominately, condominiums and <br />townhouses, what mechanisms is going to help prevent that area from becoming non- <br />primary residential homes. What is going to help prevent it from becoming student <br />housing. Unfortunately, she said the only response she ever got was that this were going <br />to be very high end town homes. Her response to that was do you know who the student <br />body is? She stated that there are at least five homes in the immediate area that have <br />currently sold to non-primary residence. They had no problem in paying upwards to <br />$200,000 to $300,000 for a house, to stay in it seven weekends a year. So it is a very real <br />possibility. She also stated that she has concerns as to obviously the noise factor and the <br />traffic flow. With the new medical building being built, which is just approximately two <br />houses from her, the difference in traffic parked on the street is quite noticeable. She <br />stated that her parents live at the far end of Napoleon Blvd, and for the past thirteen years <br />that she has lived in her house she drives down Napoleon Blvd. almost every day. She <br />now goes down St. Vincent, because getting to the intersection of Notre Dame and <br />Napoleon, cars are parked basically all the way from the corner to Angela Blvd. It is <br />hard to encroach on that intersection safely. Now, with the addition of these proposed <br />businesses, she asked how that was going to affect her neighborhood. The vision seems <br />to be stated as they want to create this pedestrian area. Again, she cautioned that the area <br />is not that much of a pedestrian area. This is the Midwest, we don’t like to walk in the <br />cold, wet, rain, snow and if these businesses are going to viable, she doesn’t find that the <br />volume of people who live in that neighborhood are going to support those businesses. <br />So for them to be viable, that means that they are going to drawing people from far <br />outside the northeast neighborhood. With those people come more cars. She stated that <br />her children and many of the children in the neighborhood very much enjoy playing on <br />the new grassy area by the medical arts building, she stated she is not sure if that is <br />something that she would continue to let her children do. Because they would have to <br />walk down the street and cross over Napoleon Blvd. and that street is going to become <br />much more congested with this new development. She stated that it has been reported <br />that there hasn’t been a lot of outcry by the neighborhood. She stated that she has talked <br />to a lot of people in the neighborhood, and they are very disheartened at the idea of the <br />beautiful greenbelt when Edison Rd. was realigned. She stated that they enjoy the little <br />rolling hills the grass, the trees, it’s a nice break from the commercial area on the other <br />side of the neighborhood. Unfortunately, a lot of the residents that live in the <br />neighborhood have children, who have homework, practice, games, and all sorts of things <br />that keep them too busy to come to meetings like this. She stated that she has encouraged <br />them to write letters and e-mail the Council if they are unable to attend the Council <br />meetings. But to say that everybody in the neighborhood is for this, she stated that she <br />would not go that far, she has talked to a lot of people who have a lot of concerns about <br />this proposed development. She also noted that the City Plan is not in place just yet, but <br />she does find some contradictions in wording that is stated in the City Plan and how it <br />relates to this and how it states that mixed use, but they are talk about catering to the <br />needs of a diverse community. Unfortunately the plans that Notre Dame is creating in the <br />northeast neighborhood are not fostering the diverse neighborhood that used to be there. <br />It is becoming an upper middle class neighborhood that will primarily be occupied by <br />employees of the University. Page 27 of the City Plan that talks about compatible uses, it <br />talks about maintaining the quality life in a community, since the land use decision will <br />effect surrounding parcels of land, sound decisions will have be made to ensure that the <br />different land uses complement each other to create the best urban form. She further read <br />from the proposed City Plan that City Government Land Use Experts and the general <br />public recognize that new developments need to integrate well with their surroundings. <br />This is achieved by following a plan incorporating characteristics to the surrounding area <br />and into the development and establish appropriate buffers for example green spaces <br />unless intensive use and reduce land use conflicts. She stated that she finds several <br />conflicts between the proposed development by the University and City Plan. She stated <br />that she sees very little green space, very little buffer between the residential <br />8 <br /> <br />