Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2006 <br />Center Parking Lot and the backside of the Sherland Building. In order to indulge their <br />six or so game days a year. Mr. Schefmeyer stated that when he came here in 1977, the <br />City had the South Bend Chamber of Commerce, again, the South Bend Chamber of <br />Commerce, now we have the St. Joseph County Chamber of Commerce, there are many <br />St. Joseph County’s in the United States, but as far as he knows there is only one South <br />Bend. Instead of trumpeting our brand, we have diluted it. In the name of inclusion, we <br />have forgotten who we really are. We need to rebuild the erosion of our brand before it is <br />gone forever. Along with the significant retail development market rate residential <br />development and major office hotel and hospital development which has already fled. <br />Mr. Schefmeyer urged the Council to reject this City Plan, as emblematic, still defying <br />the lack of leadership this City has had over the last decade. It is an exercise in mental <br />gymnastics, whose principle conclusions could have been reached by a few reasonable <br />well informed businessmen over a ten minute cup of coffee. Mr. Schefmeyer urged the <br />Council and Mayor to enlist aid of established business people who have demonstrated <br />their commitment to the City through development and investment and maintenance of <br />the public good and to guide the Mayor and his Economic Development Department on <br />how actually to attract new business and commercial activity instead of welcoming an <br />environment which seems only lately to benefit the impoverished and anti-social <br />elements of our society, indeed communities all over Indiana and from outlying areas in <br />different states, which has over burdened our central business districts increasingly <br />fragile infrastructure. Mr. Schefmeyer stated that this City Plan is a joke, thirteen <br />chapters containing policies, action steps, subsections which few will read, let alone <br />implement. By rejecting it, the Council can send a message to the Mayor, real progress is <br />not just achieved by promoting diversity and Kumbaya rhetoric, nor is development <br />encourage by simply buying eyesore properties and tearing them down. There actually <br />has to be some business accumulated and employed. Yes, the City Plan is a joke, but by <br />rejecting it, the Council can show that they will not be the butt of it. <br />Sharone Smith, Vice President of Real Estate Association of North Central Indiana. She <br />stated that they represent mainly landlords and people that wholesale properties. She <br />stated that she thinks that it is great to have future plans, but the City is in trouble now. <br />The City might not last five years to see this City Plan. The City has to close the tax <br />disparity between housing providers and homeowners. Instead of giving just <br />homeowners the homestead credit, they need to make it fair across the board. Landlords <br />suffered greatly, their taxes went up 300 to 400 percent in 2003. The closure of the tax <br />disparity will make the City a better place. There is very little income coming in to <br />improve the properties. She urged the Council to keep this in mind when they are voting <br />on the City Plan. <br />In rebuttal, <br />Mayor Luecke, stated that there are a number of positions that were stated here that bear <br />refutation. First off the population of the City of South Bend, is not declining, it is <br />increasing for the first time from 1990 to 2000. Since, 1960, the population had been <br />declining, from 1990 to 2000 a growth had been seen, and expect that growth to continue. <br />Yes, some businesses have left, other businesses have come into the City, the City <br />Administration has worked well with those businesses who wish to. Certain specific <br />projects were referenced, the law firm that left town, the Mayor stated that they did in <br />fact work with them, and tried to find them a location in downtown, they said they <br />wanted to build; they were not interesting in renting. The Mayor stated in fact, that he <br />wanted to place them in Mr. Schefmeyer’s building, but they told the City that they were <br />not interesting in renting. But, unfortunately, they were not familiar with the cost of new <br />construction; the estimates that they had gotten were way below what actual costs would <br />be. They also wanted to place a 30,000 square foot building on what should be reserved <br />for a 60,000 square foot or larger building. The Mayor stated that he encourage them to <br />look for other space. He stated that he told them if they decide that they would like to <br />rent, there are a number of places that could be looked at. They stated again that they <br />were not interested in renting. What are they doing in Mishawaka? They are renting! <br />Why are they renting there, because, they got bargain basement price, because a company <br />went out of business in Mishawaka, left Mishawaka, the company that has bought that <br />place had to fill up their building and they were giving away space. He stated that he <br />would have much rather seen them in Mr. Schefmeyer’s building, but unfortunately, they <br />22 <br /> <br />