Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 <br />be evaluated and considered by the public and the City together. The news on the fate of <br />the greenhouses and conservatories broke to the public on September 7, 2006, today is <br />September 25, 2006, and the public has only been given eighteen days to launch a <br />defense for buildings that are irreplaceable for plants and exotic species that are <br />absolutely priceless. She believes that money can be found and she does not believe that <br />the City has to cut off essential services to find it. Individual talent, the talent of <br />concerned citizens and empowered City employees can find solutions together, they just <br />need to be give adequate time which is all that is required to find cost effective solutions <br />that benefit over time. She is respectfully requesting to be put on a task force that is <br />formed. The Council, Administration and Citizens owe it to the benefactors to continue <br />the legacy that they donated to this Community; it is owed to the future, and must save <br />what would be a crime to abandon. <br />This topic has been referred to Councilmember Derek D. Dieter, Chairperson, PARC <br />Committee. <br />st <br />Ms. Janet Maciulski, 1117 S. 31 Street, South Bend, Indiana spoke opposed to the <br />closing of the greenhouse and conservatories. She stated that she is concerned about <br />what was mentioned in this afternoon’s committee meeting. She wondered why Mr. St. <br />Clair’s report was turned in today instead of in a timely manner that would allow the <br />Committee Members to actually have time to look at the information and have some idea <br />before a vote would be taken on the same day? Why would the amount of money be <br />subtracted from the budget being $100,000.00, when the citizens were told that it would <br />cost almost $300,000.00 to maintain and operate the greenhouses and conservatories for a <br />year? Is that $100,000.00 the cost of demolition? She wondered why with a 1.3 million <br />dollar surplus, for capital projects at the end of 2007 year as stated by Mr. St. Clair, why <br />the operation of the greenhouses couldn’t be included in the budget for at least one more <br />year. So that all options could be investigated, instead of making such a hasty decision. <br />No programs need to be cut if that is really a surplus in the capital projects. Where is the <br />power now? Please make sure that this doesn’t turn into being such a huge mistake. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further business to come before the Council, President Rouse adjourned <br />the meeting at 8:45 p.m. <br />ATTEST: ATTEST: <br />___________________________ __________________________ <br />John Voorde, City Clerk Timothy A. Rouse, President <br />28 <br />