Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETINGOCTOBER 8, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Dawn Jones, President, South Bend Community School Corporation Board, 602 Cushing <br />Street, South Bend, Indiana, spoke in opposition to this bill. She stated that she is the <br />President of the South Bend Community School Corporation Board. According to the <br />Bridges in Poverty Concept, people who live in poverty are in survival mode, <br />concentrating on providing for today, middle class families focus on preparing for <br />tomorrow by attending college, purchasing home, etc. Those who are wealthy do not <br />have to worry about surviving for today, nor do they have to worry about preparing for <br />tomorrow, therefore, many focus their attention on preserving the past. Marquette is <br />located on a very diverse neighborhood with diverse income levels; however, the student <br />body in Marquette is predominately low to moderate income. Nonetheless, many of the <br />parents in this district understand the significance of preparing their young children to be <br />successful in education. Recently, the School Corporation received a grant that will not <br />only address the consent decree and racial isolation but also establish a Montessori <br />Program at Marquette. This program has been scientifically proven to be successful for <br />example 100% of the third graders in the Montessori Program in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, <br />public school system passed their I-Step test. The student population of program crossed <br />many diverse lines as well, such as race, ethnicity, and economic background. A new <br />facility will be beneficial for the school corporation in order for them to offer the best of <br />the best to the students with a state-of-the art facility. She stated that the facility plan <br />does not just involve Marquette Primary Center, Clay High School, Washington High <br />School, and Monroe Primary Center. To support the vote for landmark status would <br />mean all four projects would be delayed longer than necessary. It is extremely important <br />that the necessary repairs at all four schools which are located in all sides of town, the <br />northside, southside, eastside and Westside. She urged the Council to keep this in mind <br />when they are making their decision on landmarking Marquette. The SBCSC Board of <br />Trustees was elected by the public which is an illustration of trust in them to make <br />important decisions on educational issues. She stated that the Board does not take this <br />lightly, they make the decisions based on extensive research, planning and preparation. It <br />is their duty as school board members to study the data and make informed decisions <br />based on fact. They have done this regarding this issue. Students will be impacted all <br />over the district by this decision. They owe it to this community to make provisions for <br />the students to be academically successful in an educational environment which fosters <br />growth, builds self-esteem, and introduces parents and teachers to yet another successful <br />method of teaching and an extremely beneficial curriculum. They owe it to the staff to <br />furnish a work environment that is high-tech, clean, efficient, pleasant, and second to <br />none. The current structure at all of these facilities do not meet the educational needs as <br />necessary to move the students into the technical competitive career market that they <br />need to be in. She urged the Council to vote no on landmarking and allow the taxpayers <br />to make the decision through the petition process that has already been established. She <br />urged the Council to help the SBCSC Board to help the youth of the community by <br />providing curriculums, programs, and yes facilities which will eventually cultivate <br />economic growth for the entire community. Together academic expansion can be <br />promoted for all of the students without allowing them to become stagnant in bricks and <br />mortar that will prevent them from mentally and emotionally moving forward. The <br />students deserve a new facility. <br /> <br />Mr. John Roggeman, 3811 Fernhill Drive, Mishawaka, Indiana, spoke in opposition to <br />this bill. Mr. Roggeman stated that he is a City Councilmember in Mishawaka, Indiana <br />and has served on the Mishawaka School Board for over ten (10) years. He also stated <br />that he is the Director of Employee Relations for the SBCSC. After serving in the <br />various rolls that he has in the public spotlight, and is keenly aware of the pressures <br />before the Council in making this decision. As with any decision, the positives and <br />negatives to the situation. He submits that the negatives by far surpass the positives. <br />There has been substantial evidence and opinion tonight on how to vote on this issue, <br />which he reminds the Council that it is only about the historic status of the bricks and <br />mortar located at 1905 College Street. The Council must set aside any emotion regarding <br />past graduates, teachers, and individual experiences that might have been in that building. <br />The romantic notions of FDR must be set aside also, and the PWA, and do what is A-OK <br />for the students. He urged the Council to look at the ramifications of placing Marquette <br />School under the historical status; the status would add another layer of government to <br />impede getting things accomplished. There has been some discussion about Jefferson <br /> 16 <br /> <br />