Laserfiche WebLink
application of the pedestrian-oriented district within the urban context will simplify development <br /> and strengthen the Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers. <br /> Michael Divita, Planner for the Department of Community Investment with offices on the 14th <br /> floor of the County-City Building, stated, Community Investment worked closely with the Area <br /> Plan Commission and the Building Department staff on developing the language for the text <br /> amendments presented to you all today. Essentially, the existing MU District standards were <br /> audited to ensure they align with the community's goals. As a result of that exercise, a series of <br /> changes are proposed to promote walkable Mixed-Use development through neighborhood <br /> centers through a more straight-forward code. The distribution of MU Districts in the City are <br /> shown here on the screen (referencing a presentation available in the City Clerk's Office). He <br /> continued, They do tend to be along the City's major corridors. As with the other text <br /> amendments the Council has recently approved, these changes will reduce provisions that hold <br /> back investment, will decrease the number of rezoning special exceptions and variance requests <br /> that are always made but always approved. The proposed amendments will allow property <br /> owners to more fully utilize their property. I ask for your favorable recommendation on this <br /> legislation. <br /> Councilmember Dr. David Varner stated, In the Building Design and Orientation section, it is <br /> said it has to be oriented according to the primary street. Why was it not insisted that it be <br /> oriented to the postal number? <br /> Mr. Divita replied, I suppose there could be some cases for that. There isn't much of an issue <br /> with primary streets. <br /> Committeemember Jo M. Broden asked, Do you have case studies for these? <br /> Mr. Divita showed some pictures of the buildings that are the case studies (on the presentation). <br /> Committee Chair Davis then opened the floor to members of the public wishing to speak in favor <br /> of or in opposition to the legislation. <br /> Sue Kesim, 4022 Kennedy Drive, stated, Once again I would like to advocate on behalf of <br /> people who are disabled. When you do this and there is snow or LimeBikes, my concern is that <br /> we are not leaving the ADA passageway for people to go through. I sat in the Public Works <br /> meeting and watched them permit and give away that passageway. I want to make very clear,the <br /> Council needs to stand up and support people that are disabled. <br /> Ms. Smith replied, Section 11 A and 11 B in the legislation explicitly covers the ADA <br /> compliance. <br /> Committee Chair Davis then turned the floor back to the Committee for further comment or main <br /> motion. Committeemember Broden made a motion to accept the amendments to Bill No. 89-17. <br /> Committeemember Voorde seconded this motion which carried unanimously by a voice vote of <br /> three (3) ayes. Committeemember Broden then made a motion to send Substitute Bill No. 89-17 <br /> 2 <br />