Laserfiche WebLink
sometimes all a house needs is a little bit of paint to make it look a bit better. My <br /> recommendation is while we are looking at getting the houses and minority contractors, we also <br /> build something in to where the minority contractors can get the certifications they need to take <br /> advantage of being on these projects. <br /> Jack Jacobs, 223 E. Colfax Avenue, stated, What kind of policies can be implemented at a city or <br /> county level that have historically shown success in securing property values in city in the face <br /> of market fluctuations? I think the other speakers brought up some good points about the <br /> dangerous possibility of a market downturn which would put these neighborhoods completely <br /> feel underwater. We've seen it before. In addition to a program like this, which is pending a <br /> market study, I think there needs to be a discussion to see what other things could be paired with <br /> a program like this to secure property values. What sorts of policies could be implemented to <br /> direct supermarket development toward the edges of these areas to make them walkable, or to <br /> increase public transportation to these areas? These things are what hold property values in an <br /> area, aside from market boom-bust cycles. <br /> Conrad Damian, 718 E. Broadway Street, stated, I am a person who lives in an old house next to <br /> a new house. It was not built to fit into the neighborhood. I was very concerned about that for a <br /> long time until I got used to it. One (1) of the things I think is important is to fit the homes into <br /> the streets that they're on. 466 Works is building two (2)very appropriate houses in our <br /> neighborhood that will fit in with the architecture of the old houses. We have some streets that <br /> have bungalows and you wouldn't want to come in with a two (2) story house on a street that's <br /> full of bungalows. The same way with the streets in our neighborhood that are predominantly <br /> two (2) story homes, you would want to fit the property in and encourage the same kind of <br /> home-ownership. I know that there is a program given to the City that uses a few matrices to <br /> determine what the best use for the lot would be. I think that should be looked at for all the lots <br /> in the city. Some lots, the soil isn't appropriate and all of that is taken into account when <br /> deciding what to do with the lot. In our neighborhood, fifty-one percent(51%) of the homes are <br /> rentals. We are very concerned that will be stemmed. We need to sell homes that are already <br /> there to home-owners. It's very hard because a lot of the homes are selling for very cheap. It's <br /> difficult for people to get these homes. <br /> Jose Arevalo, 3809 Fellows Street, stated, I came to South Bend to work on a Masters for a <br /> couple of years and then I went back home to Texas. One (1)thing led to the next and I've been <br /> living here for more than twenty-six (26) years. I'm a real estate broker and we've had some <br /> conversation with Anne and Regina about this plan. The numbers are pretty interesting. What I <br /> would like to see is the City turn from new construction to a co-op program that has been <br /> developed. There's a lot of other new housing especially around the southern part of the city. I <br /> think a lot can happen with a little bit of rehab money. I'm not against this model, but there is <br /> another way to expand this to provide more housing opportunities for more people. If we take a <br /> budget of between $120,000 and$160,000 to rehab a house,that's quite a lot of money for a <br /> house. Considering that if we take $160,000 and break it into four(4)parts, that's $40,000. Up <br /> and down Elmer Street, as an example, working through the neighborhoods,we've rehabbed a <br /> number of houses with under$40,000 and each of those houses is a home to a good family. The <br /> one-thousand(1,000)homes in one-thousand(1,000) days project demolished over six-hundred <br /> (600) homes. That means there are six-hundred (600) families that can't live there because their <br /> 5 <br />