Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Dr. Dave Varner stated, When we look at these things and we talk about <br /> abatements or public funding as a percentage of the project, I would like to see a baseline <br /> statement for any project. The breakdown of private investment and public investment in projects <br /> would be nice to see, as well as having a baseline percentage for private and public investment. <br /> On the recent project at the Commerce Center, there was a very aggressive tax abatement used <br /> coupled with large public support. I think that may well go beyond what we've been talking <br /> about in the past. If that sets a new standard, I'd expect more people will ask for that same <br /> standard and we ought to clarify that going forward. <br /> Mr. Pawlowski replied, If we average out three (3) or four (4) years, fifteen percent(15%) is the <br /> range or the average. We the City of course wish it were closer zero (0), developers like it to be <br /> higher but fifteen percent(15%) is where it normally falls. Regional cities projects and special <br /> projects require matches or something of that nature, but the point remains. <br /> Committeemember Regina Williams-Preston stated, I wanted to clarify something John said <br /> about TIF districts. What is the expiration on TIF districts, for example, River West?Does that <br /> never end? <br /> Mr. Pawlowski replied, Yes, every TIF has an expiration date. State law mandates an expiration <br /> on TIF districts. <br /> Councilmember Jo M. Broden stated, So I understand for the Central Business District(CBD) <br /> there are overall development plans with goals and objectives. I assume the same exists for some <br /> of the other plans. Could you address for my benefit and others the alignment of the decisions <br /> being made being reflective of the plan? How true are we to the stated goals of what would best <br /> bring about the redevelopment and development of the CBD? What is the formal process? Is that <br /> at a staff level or is it at the Redevelopment Commission level? Could you give me a sense of the <br /> nuts and bolts of what drives that process? <br /> Mr. Pawlowski replied, The redevelopment plans do go before the Redevelopment Commission. <br /> We actually are working on revisions that were necessary as result of the TIF realignment. With <br /> respect to the CBD there are multiple TIFs,the River West and the River East. The plans govern <br /> types of uses that we are after or activities that we are after. So it's not necessarily a specific <br /> delineation of what we want, we try to cast a pretty broad net because you never know when <br /> people are going to come in. But in terms of the uses, it is what you would think. Mixed-Use is <br /> about as specific as we get when it comes to plans. When you talk about acquisition of <br /> properties, that is more of a developer-level conversation. I'd say the most relevant and most <br /> used land use is the Mixed-Use classification. <br /> Upon completion of the presentation, Committee Chair Ferlic adjourned the Community <br /> Investment Committee Meeting at 3:59 p.m. <br /> Respectfully Submitted, <br /> Gavin Ferlic, Chairperson <br /> 3 <br />