01-23-17 Zoning and Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

be able to have trucks or cars go out onto Mayflower. That would force the cars back down Dylan Drive. The proposed written commitment is requesting Type B landscaping, which is a single row of evergreen trees. The ordinance only requires one (1) shade tree every forty (40) feet. This is asking for at least the single row of evergreen trees. If the building would get within three-hundred(300) feet of that line,to increase that even further would require full screening to protect any residentials. Committeemember Broden asked, So, it's just a portion of this entire area being developed, at this point? Ms. Smith responded, They are only proposing to develop a portion of the site at this time, yes. Committeemember Davis asked what the timeframe for action was. Ms. Smith responded,Ninety(90) days, unless requested to be tabled by the petitioner. Committeemember Davis asked, The ninety (90) days started when? Ms. Smith responded, When we sent the recommendation, we forwarded you our report on Wednesday of last week. Committeemember Davis asked, That is on both policies that we just did? Ms. Smith responded, On any of the zoning issues, yes. Committeemember Broden asked when the meeting minutes from the Area Plan Commission meeting would become available. Ms. Smith responded, They won't be approved until our next Area Plan Commission meeting. If requested, we have been known in the past to, when some petition is ahead,to do them out of order if we need to. Typically, it would take one (1) week or two (2), because we do them verbatim. Cittizen Committeemember Gerald Phipps stated, If I remember correctly, when this PUD was approved there was at least hope that there would be an interchange to add US-31 on Adams Road. It would appear from the proposed development that that interchange is no longer expected or being planned for—is that correct? Ms. Smith responded, From what I understand,there was a hope to put the interchange there. I don't think anyone wants to pay for it at this point. I believe the developers have tried over time to go back. They did try to make an effort in the layout of this lot. Ms. Smith explained that only a diamond interchange would work for that area. The buildings are already up. The State is not going to acquire a building and tear down a new building to get a Clover Leaf. Committeemember Phipps stated, But the reason for the PUD in this area was the mixed uses that would result from having an interchange. 10