Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 2017 <br />Robin Vida, 50432 Righter Lane, South Bend, IN, stated that there were no walking options on <br />Adams Road for her and her son. Ms. Vida stated, The last thing we need is exactly what <br />everyone's been talking about: we don't need more large buildings. Nimtz Parkway has ample <br />space, I feel. As I drive it, I see very nice buildings that no one's ever actually utilized to their <br />capacity. Ms. Vida recommended sidewalks and biking paths as a way to make things easier. She <br />stated that if she had known that this development was coming, she would not have purchased <br />her first home in the area. She asked for the bill to be tabled or abandoned, stating, They need to <br />leave the northern part of the City into the County alone. <br />Debbie Green, 50268 Righter Lane, South Bend, IN, asked, Who is paying for the roads that <br />need to be done before you do any of this? The City? Ms. Green urged that the roads need to be <br />fixed before this project goes forward. She asked if any of the businesses going into the proposed <br />building would get tax abatements. She stated that anyone signed on for a five (5) year tax <br />abatement should be required to sign on for another ten (10) years, otherwise those businesses <br />will leave and there will be nothing but empty buildings. She asked the members of the Council <br />if any of them had been to and seen the area. She encouraged them to do so, stating, You don't <br />live out there. You have no clue. <br />Mr. McMorrow returned to the podium and stated, Back in 2005, the petition was made not only <br />to rezone this particular property, but to annex it into the City. So, these properties were owned <br />by the County. One of the things that Jeff and I heard at the German Township Public Library <br />was that there never has been a problem with the public finding out about what's going on. This <br />whole process in 2005 and what we are experiencing now has come with a lot of public attention. <br />I honestly think that's a good thing. Corbitt Kerr and I are going to work very closely on making <br />sure that this intersection is designed appropriately to be safe. One of the comments Mr. <br />Nicholas made about the three- hundred (300) foot offset: we talked about that at the public <br />session at the library. What we are trying to do is promote that north -south traffic and not allow <br />that traffic east and west. When moving that road any place, it can't be closer to the bypass, <br />because that will do one (1) of two (2) things: it would forever eliminate the possibility that <br />there's an interchange there, or deny access to the property, because most of us agree that it <br />shouldn't be on Mayflower right now. Regarding the parking count, there's staggered shifts at <br />CTDI. There aren't two- hundred (200) people per shift, so they manage that so that there are <br />never more people in the building than there are parking spaces. <br />Mr. Smoke added, Overall, there is less than two percent (2 %) vacancy in St. Joseph County for <br />industrial buildings like this. There have been a lot of comments tonight about business going <br />elsewhere —there aren't any other buildings around right now. This is the only location that can <br />handle a building like this and the tenant would like the visibility on the highway. That is one of <br />their big priorities, to have the advertising and branding ability of the bypass. They looked at <br />sites along the toll road, and they didn't work out. South Bend is known for its distribution <br />capabilities and its capabilities to reach a certain amount of population within a twelve (12) hour <br />drive. I think it only makes sense to recognize that and help it grow and foster. <br />Councilmember Karen White stated that the conversation between the developer and the <br />neighborhood had only begun and needed to continue. Councilmember White stated that there <br />was not much room in any other part of the City for a development of this scope. She assured <br />those residents of the County who were present that the Council does listen to them, even if it <br />does not seem as if they do. She stated, I think it will work itself out. Councilmember White <br />encouraged the developer to continue to have conversations with the neighbors, the City, and the <br />County, especially given the infrastructure concerns brought up over the course of the evening. <br />Councilmember Tim Scott stated that he agreed with everything that Councilmember White <br />stated. Councilmember Scott added that a duty that the Council has within the City is to <br />maximize the developments and the property within the City. He stated that this was an issue of <br />borders between the County and City, and that the best thing that can be done is to look at how <br />those transition lines are. He stated that zoning decisions always leave a certain number of <br />people unhappy, but that the good thing that comes out of these proceedings is conversation on <br />topics such as improving streets, etc. He stated that maximizing these pieces of property that <br />have been a part of the City for a long time was necessary to bringing revenue to the City to fix <br />things like roads. Councilmember Scott stated that Elkhart County would die for a project like <br />17 <br />