My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-09 Common Council Meeting Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
11-23-09 Common Council Meeting Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 4:42:25 PM
Creation date
11/19/2009 4:42:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals -September 2, 2009 <br />house running there. I welcome anybody here to come see my home. I've restored it. It's beautiful. I <br />planned on living in the home and I'm certainly not going to rent it to a bunch of animals that's going to tear it <br />up. I mean, I can't speak for all of these other landlords but I know how I will tend to my property. I take a <br />great deal of pride in it as did my grandparents when they lived there. As we said my father went to Notre <br />Dame and rented a room there and met my mother. You know I'd like to find a nice group of people and rent <br />to them. All I can do is promise you that I will keep up the property and if this ever does turn back to being <br />single family homes, believe me I'll be the first one on board. In fact I would consider moving back. But as I <br />said before we have lost the neighborhood and it's too late now. I've stuck it out. I've done my time. And <br />I'd like to be let out of this now. I'm a hostage in the middle of all this. Thank you. <br />MR. URBANSKI: I have to say this has been a meeting and a half. Not time wise but issues. Is there a <br />motion? I truly hope we send it with some type of a recommendation other than no recommendation. <br />I was really happy to see Nancy back there. I really mean that and look at her husband and the situation they <br />are and I don't think that the situation that they are in right now and her husband's health but they're the only <br />one in that neighborhood. I sympathize with the people on both sides, I really do. Not in my backyard. Do I <br />want four houses around me, three houses or six houses on the street, seven houses. I wish our Councilman <br />from the second district was still here. And I wish Ann was. Yeah they will have the final say on this. I'm <br />the one who said a few minutes ago that as a Board we needed to act one way or the other. You know I don't <br />know if I can right now. We are an appointed Board. They are an elected Council and am I trying to get out <br />of it? Yes. And I hope everybody here understands my position. I guess I'll make a motion to send it with no <br />recommendation. <br />A motion to send the petition to the Common Council with No Recommendation is made by Mr. Urbanski and <br />seconded~by Mr. Hawley. <br />MR. PHIPPS: I guess my comment is that doing these lot by lot is unfortunately the wrong approach. But we <br />certainly don't have the power to some say in the zoning to change this back into a traditional single family <br />neighborhood that wasn't overrun by students. Unfortunately the zoning of the past has put us in the situation <br />where a multitude of homes are occupied by many people and I'm sure that turns the neighborhood into <br />someplace where you probably wouldn't want to live. To just give up and say the whole thing should be multi <br />family and let it go would probably make some sense logically. But are still as we heard so people who are <br />sticking it out and hoping for a change the other way. It may be idealistic and say yeah, we'll give an <br />unfavorable recommendation for this but it's not going to change the situation. It may make more sense to <br />actually zone a section and say well this is turned over essentially to a large numbers of Notre Dame students <br />but that's not a choice we have. We have one recommendation on one small parcel and whatever we do seems <br />a little illogical. <br />MR. URBANSKI: Ms. Taylor you were involved with the City plan as much as I was, very much so. But <br />even before the City plan about 10 or 12 years ago, a South Bend organization came to the City of South Bend <br />and wanted to put in a University Village with South Bend is the only major university town that doesn't have <br />one. And I don't know if you remember that company who's offices are on Main Street about a block away <br />from us. Their idea was to convert everything back from the St. Joe River toward the university back to single <br />family dwellings and no rentals at all. Do you remember that? And to build very expensive, $1,100 to $1,200 <br />a month rentals by Notre Dame in the woods and they got turned down. And somebody from Indianapolis...I <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.