11-28-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2016 wouldn't be counted toward any violations. If anything comes up at the Fire Department, Chico will notify Keenan, and he will check to see if that property has had any prior issues and take that into consideration. Councilmember Scott further explained that the Fire Inspectors are part of that investigative task force, working similarly to Officer Keenan Lane on the Fire side. They subsequently collaborate with Officer Keenan Lane and/or Code Enforcement. He stated that Santi Garces, who is with IT, was also present at the meeting to help develop the backbone of the reporting mechanism, by which they may collate and sort through Code, Fire, Police data. Councilmember Davis stated that he wanted to make sure that if someone needed to procure information, they could do so from the Fire Department as well as the Police Department. Councilmember Scott confirmed that they could. He recounted a situation where a person burned every piece of lumber that he came across and Fire Marshall Rodriguez, who inspected the matter, gave him the appropriate letters. The individuals who complained about the violator actually called the Police to begin with, so it filtered through Officer Keenan Lane or another member of the Police Department to the Fire Department, who then went out to investigate. Legal Research Assistant Rodriguez further explained that the letters sent by the Fire Department go through Assistant City Attorney Colborn, illustrative of the collaboration between the Fire Department and the Police because, as Ms. Rodriguez explained, it all goes through Ms. Colborn. Councilmember Scott expressed appreciation for the Council who had voted for the original version of the ordinance. There has been tremendous success with the ordinance. The number of nuisance calls has dropped. He stated that the number of properties on the Chronic Nuisance List that he normally sees online is from two (2) to eight (8). Officer Keenan Lane processes hundreds (I 00's) of first warnings, though. At three (3) violations, one receives a warning letter, at which point Officer Keenan Lane contacts the requisite enforcement bodies to work through the issue. The original goal was to not have any violations or anyone on the list. The City's tax dollars, as a result, are not going toward repeat offenders. Councilmember Scott stated that the ordinance is working much better than he had anticipated. Councilmember Regina Williams- Preston stated that she appreciated the ordinance for doing a better job of getting at issues Council attempted to address with landlord registration. She expressed appreciation for the collaboration necessary to effectively enforce the ordinance and also expressed a desire to be present at future meetings and discussions. Councilmember Williams- Preston stated that she was concerned, though, that there was an issue of subjectivity that could creep into the enforcement of the ordinance, arguing that the ordinance in its current form does not distinguish between smaller and larger properties, requiring an officer to determine through investigation whether or not a property is in violation of the Code instead of passing over smaller property cases altogether. She stated that she had questions about the constitutionality of using fines to bring about compliance, but thought it was wise that the ordinance includes in its language the notion that any part of the ordinance should be stricken if proven unconstitutional. Councilmember Williams- Preston then asked, in relation to the dedication of fines and fees, what the reasoning was behind the money going to the Law Enforcement Continuing Education Fund. Councilmember Scott responded, I think that we needed to support that fund. The administration is not a big fan of reverting funds. Most of the legwork being done with this is in the Police Department, and I think, out of anything, we need more education within our Police Department. Councilmember Williams- Preston stated that she remembered that civil penalties coming out of Code Enforcement go to the Unsafe Building Fund. She stated, I'm not sure how that parses out. Councilmember Scott responded that the Police fund was what was decided on at the time. Councilmember Williams- Preston responded, Maybe it's a difference because this is specifically Chronic Nuisance =like how it comes about. If it's one thing, it will go to the Unsafe Building Fund; if it's another thing, it goes into this Law Enforcement Continuing Education Fund. 10