Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETINGOCTOBER 12, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Feldbaum stated that the bonds are issued by the City of South Bend and then the <br />City of South Bend takes the money, and in this case about $8 million dollars and loaned <br />it to PEI/Genesis and then PEI/Genesis signed a promissory note and loan agreement to <br />pay the money back. However, what happens is that promissory note that PEI/Genesis <br />signed gets assigned by the City to the Trustee for the Bond Holders and then the City is <br />out of the picture and that happens simultaneously with the closing and is part of it. So <br />the note is transferred and the documents expressly state that there is no recourse back <br />against the City or about any of the City’s property or the State, or the Council, or <br />anybody else and that the bonds are payable solely from the payments by the Company <br />on the note or in the event that the company doesn’t pay, then the payments by the bank <br />that has issued the line of credit would secure it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse stated that he understands that, but this is the point that he is <br />making that it is a win for the borrower in this case PEI/Genesis. It’s a win/win for the <br />person who is investing in the tax exempt bond, it out to be a win/win for the City of <br />South Bend in that we negotiate, and he is not asking that it be part of a tax abatement <br />ordinance, but simply a paradigm shift that says listen, the City is willing to help and <br />want to help, but at the same time have some concerns per the Act, about the health and <br />general welfare of the persons living in this City. He stated that it is in the Act and all <br />that has to be done is to read it and understand that collectively this is a wonderful <br />opportunity to enhance both the borrower, the manufacturer in this case and helps the <br />people who are willing to invest in these bonds, but it also can be a bigger win/win for <br />the City of South Bend. He stated that is what he is driving after. <br /> <br />Mr. Feldbaum pointed out one thing that does happen at the Economic Development <br />Commission level is that they do ask about the creation of jobs and employment. He <br />stated that there is a report that is actually issued by the Economic Development <br />Commission at the time that the bonds came before in 2007, that actually talked about the <br />jobs that were going to be created. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse stated that he is willing to discuss this and is not asking for an <br />Ordinance change, he reiterated that they need to be more cognizant of how this process <br />works and how the City of South Bend can get a bigger piece of the employment. He <br />stated that the City of South Bend has a massive unemployment rate compared to St. <br />Joseph County and what he would like to see done is that when the City issues these <br />bonds, is to see more employed in Portage Township and those townships that are <br />directly related to South Bend, Indiana. He stated that he is all for St. Joseph County and <br />all of those other wonderful things, but the priority needs to be the boundaries of this <br />City. <br /> <br />Mr. Feldbaum stated that he doesn’t have the exact number or breakdown of where <br />workers live, but would be happy to look into that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse stated that he is an elected official and a fiscal officer in the City <br />of South Bend and is looking to focus on opportunities to enhance this city, because the <br />unemployment rate is a little bit higher than the rest of the county, along with some other <br />negative situations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that he asked earlier this afternoon who owns the <br />building that was recently vacated by PEI/Genesis on Bendix Avenue, and who was <br />paying the mortgage if there is one and the taxes on it and after further discussion tonight <br />and the answers that were given it completely changed how he feels and will not be <br />voting in favor of this in good conscience. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis questioned what Councilmember Rouse meant by this issue <br />being out of the gate and what can the Council do in the future to address this issue <br />without it being out of the gate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse stated that he looks at this bill and really does support it as lessons <br />learned. He stated that the way he learned about this was is to take the 135 page <br />document that was attached to the ordinance and started to study it, and what happens <br /> 5 <br /> <br />