Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 24, 2016 <br />years' time. The prudent approach would be to do this over time and phase it in. You are facing <br />additional problems in 2020 and we should take a step back. Only two (2) Councilmembers have <br />raised serious questions about this. The Council is the oversight for these type of raises. One (1) <br />raise in particular is of concern, and this is not to pick on City employees who do an exceptional <br />job, but the Park Director received a seventeen percent (17 %) raise in 2014 and is slated to <br />receive another twenty -three percent (23 %) raise in 2017 and that is what the media reported. We <br />should consider a phase -in approach for these because we do not know what the economy will be <br />like next year. He also stated he has serious questions about the consolidation of the Parks <br />Director because it now needs very different sets of skills than one (1) person can do. We have <br />had a problem with funding Elbel because there were insufficient funds and yet we are <br />considering these raises. <br />Drew Duncan, 1620 South Bend Ave, stated he has been here before and he is going from a <br />citizen that is curious to one (1) that is concerned. He stated this is upsetting because he is a <br />young professional that the City is trying to attract and every year our City is put on the map <br />because we have to have these types of discussions. We have added responsibilities but we are <br />not cutting the budget anywhere. He asked who previously had those responsibilities and do they <br />still have jobs. If we are consolidating positions then by all means they deserve more money but <br />that means someone should lose a job and money should be saved elsewhere. There doesn't seem <br />to be a lot of that. There seems to be a cloud of distrust between the citizens and the City workers <br />and who we have elected. He stated never once has he come here and seen something <br />controversial not go through. We have shown that we will not do due diligence and there will be <br />no follow up after this passes. No one will check on the merit and performance of these people. <br />They will get money and that will be the end of it. He asked when the citizens get their questions <br />answered and when will there start being some transparency between the government and the <br />citizens. This is a lot of money considering we have people complaining about the services the <br />City is offering. Also we are adding a position to Code Enforcement which has been an absolute <br />disaster this year so why give them more money. We need to work together so that we are paying <br />attention to what our employees are doing. We are supposed to be retaining top talent but one (1) <br />of the positions is getting a raise of over thirty percent (30 %). We do want smart and intelligent <br />people to work here but we have to spend money wisely and make sure the talent we have here is <br />working. There are so many questions around this talent we are supposed to be retaining but we <br />are having issues with the positions getting more money. If you have someone giving a <br />presentation on the budget and cannot answer all the questions concerning the budget, that <br />should be a huge concern whether we should pass the budget. <br />Sharon Banicki, 3822 West Ford Street, stated Barnes and Thornburg have said TIF funds may <br />not be used for the operational expenses of the Redevelopment Commission. She stated to her <br />that means if you have an engineer on staff then he would be part of operations expenses. <br />Professional services are outside contractors and not on the payroll getting benefits. Playing with <br />the TIF funds is playing with fire. We are not retaining top talent now anyways. There are so <br />many unemployed and underemployed people who would jump at the chance to work at the City <br />for half of these positions. Anyone can be a good public servant at $100,000 a year. <br />Charles Smith, 2023 South Taylor Street South Bend, stated he comes to the City with many <br />issues and the answer he always gets is that we don't have the funds. We do need an increase for <br />certain departments, but where is this money coming from. As Mayor Pete stated there are thirty <br />(30) people living under a bridge but yet he knows of only three (3) leaders in this room that <br />have actually visited that site. <br />Ms. Sullivan, Pile Avenue South Bend, stated we should give a fair increase across the board to <br />all positions. She asked why there was such a radical difference for some of these positions. The <br />people who protect us and keep us safe should get the same increase as what other people do. It <br />is very upsetting that someone can make $117,000 a year but our law enforcement gets two <br />percent (2 %). She stated she is disappointed in the City of South Bend. <br />Gerry Fry, 401 West Madison South Bend, stated he was recently away from town and is just <br />getting back into the swing of things. He stated he is not sure if he is for it or against it but he <br />understands the battle here. He stated he has been a public servant in many different positions <br />and the people do move around when they are not paid well. If you have a good talent you better <br />15 <br />