Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 30, 1982 <br />question, assured the property owners in attendance that the <br />Penny Saver had no plans to construct a fence around the <br />portion of the alley proposed to be vacated and that they <br />could continue to use a portion of the Penny Saver parking <br />lot for access to their property. She stated that the Penny <br />Saver has been maintaining the property for several years, the <br />use of the property for its parking lot being consistent with <br />the previous parking lot use by the former occupant of the <br />building, the A & P Grocery Store. Regarding the snow plowing, <br />she explained that during the last winter another individual <br />was hired but always plowed the snow onto the southeast corner <br />of the property and not out.into the°alley. She stated that <br />she and her husband have purchased the property under a land <br />contract and have outgrown the present building. She added that, <br />several years ago, the two parking lots south of the building <br />were acquired. Mr. Solomon Lim, architect 1520 East Cedar <br />Street, advised that he was designing the plans for the.Penny <br />Saver for expansion of their present quarters. He confirmed <br />that a variance was being requested for construction of a <br />storage building near the.alley. He stated that, if the <br />�. variance was approved, the building would not be located right <br />up to the alley but between eight and nine feet from the public <br />right-of-way. He stated that openings to the Penny Saver parking <br />lot would remain open and the residents could utilize the parking <br />lot to enter the portion of the alley which would remain open. <br />Mr. Gerald Cook, 111 East Donald Street, was concerned about <br />fire protection to adjoining properties if the alley was closed <br />to traffic. <br />Mr. Hill advised that easements could resolve the access problems; <br />however, the Board wanted to conduct a site visit to see in person <br />where the problems would exist prior to making its decision on <br />the vacation. Upon a motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. <br />Leszczynski and carried, the matter was continued to the <br />September 13th meeting of the Board in order that a site visit <br />could be conducted prior to that time. Councilwoman Beck stated <br />that she would schedule a Residential Neighborhood Committee <br />meeting sometime in the afternoon of the 13th since the Common <br />Council would be conducting its public hearing that evening on <br />the vacation of the alley in question. The Clerk was instructed <br />to schedule the site visit and notify Councilwoman Beck, the <br />petitioner and adjacent property owners. <br />AWARD BID AND APPROVE CONTRACT - RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION <br />(SAMPSON STREET EXTENSION) <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that the Bureau of Public Construction <br />was recommending the Board award the low bid of Rieth-Riley <br />Construction Company in the amount of $21,862.50 for the Sampson <br />Street Extension Project, the bids for which were received and <br />opened by the Board on August 23, 1982. Upon a motion made by <br />Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the recommenda- <br />tion to award the bid and the contract with Rieth-Riley Construction <br />in the amount of $21,862.50 for the above project were approved; <br />and the required Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Payment <br />Bond were filed. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (FINAL) AND PROJECT COMPLETION AFFIDAVIT - <br />RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION (PRAIRIE AVENUE GUARDRAIL PROJECT) <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that Change Order No. 1 (final) on the <br />Prairie Avenue Guardrail Project was being submitted for Board <br />approval by Rieth-Riley Construction Com any, which change order <br />decreased the original contract cost by $183.36. Also being <br />submitted was the Project Completion Affidavit which reflected <br />a total contract cost, including the above change order, of <br />$7,647.09. Upon a motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by <br />Mr. Kernan and carried, the above Change Order No. 1 (final) and <br />the Project Completion Affidavit were approved, and the required <br />Maintenance Bond extending for a three-year period to August 30, <br />1985, was filed. <br />