Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />DECEMBER 14, 2015 <br />Tom Nowack, 2212 Webster St, spoke in favor of the petition. He stated if the City put an alley <br />there it will cost the City of South Bend a lot of money. <br />No one from the public spoke in opposition. <br />Councilmember Dieter made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council concerning <br />this bill. Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine <br />(9) ayes. <br />BILL NO. 73 -15 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING <br />SECTION 13 -96 OF ARTICLE 10, CHAPTER 13 OFFENSES <br />AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS AND AMENDING <br />SECTION 2- 213 OF CHAPTER 2 ADDRESSING A <br />SCHEDULE OF ORDINANCE AND CODE VIOLATIONS OF <br />THE SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE <br />Councilmember Dieter reported the Health and Public Safety Committee met and sends the bill <br />to the Council with a favorable recommendation. <br />Councilmember Scott, 711 Forest Ave., presented this bill. He stated this petition deals with <br />irresponsible gunfire in the City because as most people know all shots fired up must come <br />down. Mr. Scott stated the ordinance would tighten up the fine and demonstrate the City takes all <br />gunfire seriously. Currently the fine is arbitrary and set by the officer writing the violation and <br />the fine can vary widely. The bill would set the fine at $2,500 maximum. <br />Councilmember Scott also stated that the petition would change the ordinance that any firearm <br />fired would be seized and not returned until proof of payment and valid ownership of firearm. He <br />stated this should be the purview of the police so the proposal strikes out that part of the <br />ordinance. Councilmember Scott reported that the Chief of Police also favors this petition. <br />Scott Ruszkowski, Chief of Police, was available for questions. He thanked the Council for <br />helping with this matter. He reported he does not want to do police work based on monetary <br />advantage but this is a safety issue and a measure which should be passed. <br />Councilmember Dieter questioned what leeway does the City have to reduce the payment if the <br />person cannot pay the fine? Also, he asked does the Police Department have a mechanism to <br />enforce ShotSpotter which puts the teeth in this proposed ordinance. <br />Chief Ruszkowski answered that officers are not told to stay out of harm's way. He stated the <br />officers have to use their discretion in each individual case and ShotSpotter can pinpoint these <br />locations and if further evidence is found it can be put forward. <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis asked what are the average fines currently. He asked how many <br />fines are given yearly on average and how many on New Year's and other celebration times. <br />Councilmember Davis also asked since ShotSpotter is only available on the northwest side how <br />will this bill be enforced on the whole City and what is the range of fines? <br />Chief Ruszkowski responded that he believes the range is around twenty -five (25) one - hundred <br />(100) dollars and did not know how many of these fines are currently being issued. <br />Councilmember Scott stated during the research of this bill the average fine was around one- <br />hundred dollars ($100). He also did not know how many there were in a year. He stated most of <br />the gunfire happens during Fourth of July and New Year's but even in the past two (2) weekends <br />we have had random shootings. <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis asked how this will work since ShotSpotter is not available <br />throughout the whole City. <br />Chief Ruszkowski responded enforcement will come down to the individual officer to find the <br />person regardless if ShotSpotter is or is not in place. He reported the public can call in or the <br />4 <br />