08-22-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 22, 2016 Velvet Canada, 106 S. Niles Avenue, stated she agrees with the previous speakers. It makes sense for the Northeast Neighborhood to want to take this exception out but in the CBD it doesn't makes sense. We shouldn't have to go through a forty -five (45) day process just to have three (3) people who are unrelated live together. Adam McMillen, 215 East Colfax Ave., stated he agrees with what the other people have said in opposition. This process is a long period of time especially in terms of people living together. The current proposal is not the most effective for making this momentum keep moving forward. Jesse Davis, P.O. Box 10205 South Bend IN, stated the forty -five (45) day period is ridiculous because you can close on a house in less than thirty (30) days and be moved in. The Council should not have the right to make these judgment calls on other people's properties. Any bureaucratic red tape will slow growth in the City and that is not what South Bend needs. Meghan Curwin, 223 East Colfax Ave., echoed the other sentiments in opposition. She stated she has always had a minimal of two (2) roommates and she can understand the concern people have who are in favor of this. She used to live over by Notre Dame and the students across the street were crazy and that's what we seem to want to have a check on. This does seem like a very long process just to have a house have three (3) roommates. Ms. Curwin asked who's responsibility does this fall upon, the homeowner or the renters. Two (2) is such a small number for people who are unrelated and that should be raised. Jack Jacobs, 223 East Colfax, stated he respects everyone's views expressed tonight. He stated he is the exact person who benefits from the current language and it allows him to handle his student debt and establish himself in South Bend. Councilmember Jo M. Broden, sponsor of the bill, gave a rebuttal. We are looking to affirm these creative and organic uses. It is asking for a process and if you want to be in the business of opening up your house to two (2) or more individuals it would certainly require a bit of legwork on your behalf. We ,have expanded the definition to exceed what was on the books before. We have also added the group residents within a district that before did not exist. In terms of the concerns with shift work by healthcare providers, for the most part it would not preclude that. Yes three - hundred dollars ($300) is a decent amount of money and the burden would be on the property owner. Many of the issues brought up in the process like contacting the neighbors is actually provided as a service through the Area Plan Commission staff. Chairperson Ferlic allowed each Councilmember to ask questions and give their comments. Councilmember Williams- Preston stated this brought up a lot of questions for her. She asked what the repercussions for not following this process would be. Ms. Smith responded if there was a situation where a household was not meeting the definition of family it would be a code violation and they would proceed to the code violation process. Ms. Smith stated she does not work for Code Enforcement but it would be along the lines of a letter and a chance to appeal and correct the violation. Then a fine would most likely be instituted. Councilmember Williams- Preston stated her concern is for the folks who are currently residents who may not have the ability to pay the three - hundred dollars ($300) or have a language barrier in terms understanding what the process is. She stated she is interested in understanding more about that Code Enforcement process. She stated she thinks a lot of people are living in these arrangements now and hopefully we don't see tons of people coming and doing this process. Ms. Smith stated she doesn't know how many people currently are in this situation but you can apply for more than one (1) address at the same time. The Building Department also spends a large amount of their time trying to help people through the various processes. Councilmember Dr. David Varner stated it looks like we are primarily talking about the Central Business District. If this goes ahead, there will be some sort of guidelines established by the Council so that we do not have people continuously stretching this ordinance. He stated he is not a big fan of rules but if it happens there does need to be guidelines. He stated he would prefer to have a later effective date to establish some guidelines and rules on our side. H.