05-09-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

's REGULAR MEETING May 9, 2016 Council Attorney Cekanski - Farrand added that this action is required by Indiana Code Section Thirty -Six (36) which gives the Mayor two (2) options every time a resolution or ordinance is presented to the Mayor for action. Either the Mayor can approve or send a message to the City Clerk that he is vetoing the ordinance or he can take no action at all. In this case no action was taken, therefore the Council is required at the next meeting to take by two - thirds vote to override the action. If the Council does not take a vote it is considered a pocket -veto. Councilmember Dr. David Varner asked that when a resolution is proposed by the Council, does the statute require action by the Mayor. He wished to know if the Council as part of the resolution could not include the line "subject to the Mayor's approval" and it would rather be a statement of the Council. Council Attorney Cekanski - Farrand responded because the state law specifically states after an ordinance or resolution is adopted it is then presented to the City Executive. Council President Tim Scott added his comments on this resolution because he was absent at the last meeting. The spirit of this bill of more dog parks is a good idea but he has concerns with the nine (9) member advisory committee. Council President Scott stated he is not comfortable with the language that is in the resolution the way it is; however if you have the two - thirds votes then that's fine. A lot of things like Elbel that have come to us and we formed advisory committees should have really been studied and their due diligence done by the Park Board and Parks Department. This could lead to a slippery slope where we are doing the work of the Administration. This is not to disrespect the presenter or the spirit of this bill. Councilmember Oliver Davis responded it is nice to have more community involvement to build trust. One of the things we learned from Elbel is we really saw trust and community involvement in that special committee. When you have special issues like this, it's okay for us to come and make recommendations to the Park Board. The Board could ignore those recommendations but for us to show some guidance and ideas is a part of the democracy that we need to continue. It doesn't always have to be something tough like smoking bans or park closures but it can be a fun thing like this dog park. Councilmember Gavin Ferlic expressed concern regarding the number of meetings and the resources that both the Clerk's Office and the Administration dedicates towards these committees. Councilmember Oliver Davis stated he did ask the City Clerk before he brought this forward and if there was some concern the Clerk should have informed him. Councilmember Davis asked City Clerk Kareemah Fowler to share her opinion on the matter. City Clerk Kareemah Fowler responded that she told Councilmember Davis that her office would staff this committee this time but she is concerned about the amount of resources multiple extra committees take up and the way the legislation is written. She also told Councilmember Davis that the Clerk's Office should not be the only entity in the resolution that has to be accountable for being at the meeting. Councilmember Regina Williams- Preston stated the Council needs to do work and come up with a good process and strategy to invite productive public input so we can make good decisions. So that way when there is an issue like studying a dog park there is a straight process to follow on how to solicit community feedback. Councilmember Randy Kelly stated he would like to echo concerns about the resources that the Clerk's Office puts into these committees whenever we as a Council put together special committees. Also, it is important that we try not to step on the toes of the people who it is their job to do this. There are already structures in place that fulfill this need. Councilmember Kelly stated he loves the idea of getting the community together looking at areas for dog parks and they can certainly bring those to the PARC Committee or Park Board. It does not need to necessarily take the resources from the Clerk's Office or what Mr. Perri and his department are trying to do. 22