04-11-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING APRIL 11, 2015 when the federal government has not made that agreement yet. Second, throughout this agreement the Tribe retains its sovereignty and they can change their mind later and the City has no recourse. This Tribe has changed their mind over the years, when they became a recognized Tribe they claimed they didn't want to start casinos and now they have changed their mind. There is no guarantee of this money over the long -term and there is no recourse we could have because they are a sovereign nation. She stated she realizes the Mayor has worked diligently to make sure South Bend gets something from this potential casino but is concerned that potential money has clouded the potential for the increase in crime both violent and nonviolent. How does giving money to these various groups help the family whose daughter gets raped or the family who doesn't have money for food because they are caught in addictions? Our federal government has not okayed this yet but we are rushing into it. Kelly Havens, 12032 Timberline Trace N. Granger, Indiana 46530, stated even though she is a County resident she is speaking against the casino because it would affect the entire county and Michiana region. The quality of life will change and hurt the residents near that proposed casino. This casino project takes a significant piece of property off the tax rolls and that is a problem for a county that has the distinction of having the highest tax exempt properties in Indiana. It means that whatever taxes will not be paid by the casino will be borne by the rest of the residents in the county. This facility would not be subject to South Bend Code or South Bend ordinances. We are putting a lot of risk into this venture without considering all the possibilities. Most of money that goes into this casino will come from South Bend, Mishawaka and St. Joe County residents and that is money not being spent in grocery stores, retail stores and other establishments. This is $50 million being sucked out of the local economy. Given those negatives, why should any elected official be in favor of this? This agreement only grants two percent (2 %) out of the profits, not the revenue, and that is ridiculous. Why would this Council ruin the Southwest side of the City for that amount of money? When five (5) years from now, and the quality of life has suffered in South Bend, this City will regret this plan and this casino. This plan will have an impact on the federal decision. This Council would be selling the soul of St. Joseph County for two cents on the dollar and some shiny lollipops. Barry Bambaugh, 12032 Timberline Trace N. Granger, Indiana 46530, opposed the casino for a number of moral and ethical reasons but the biggest one is because of the sovereignty issue. The U.S. should not be giving out sovereign U.S. soil to another sovereign nation, we cannot parcel our nation apart. We are not giving England the ability to come buy land and call it sovereign British soil. We should not be doing the same with the Potawatomi. That being said, because the city cannot do much regarding if the casino can come here and cannot do anything about the smoking issue, however the City did negotiate with these people and this would create a monopoly sanctioned by this Council. The Council took away the private rights of the bars to allow smoking and now this Council would allow the Potawatomi to have a monopoly on smoking. Apparently, the agreement also opposes any other gaming that may come into the city because the Potawatomi are afraid of competition. That part of the agreement should be stripped from this bill. You do not have to give approval to this and renegotiate with the Tribe or take away the non - smoking ordinance. Judith Overmyer, 3447 S. Locust Dr., South Bend, stated she lives closer to the proposed casino than almost anyone in the City but that is not the only reason she opposes the casino. The casino nowadays are slot machines that are controlled by the computer and people are guaranteed to lose. Dowagiac in its first year had a $54 million revenue and only gave $2 million of that to the city. The rest of that money was pocketed by the casino and sucked out of the community. Private casinos in Indiana pay in taxes a range from five percent (5 %) to forty percent (40 %). The money being taken out of this casino is money that families should spend on clothes, services and local retail stores. She requested that at least one councilmember votes against this so when the Indians go try to get federal approval they cannot say the City unanimously supports the casino. The Federal Government knows casinos are bad and that is why there is a moratorium on them, South Bend should know that too. Susan Daniels, 1314 Huffinan Dr. South Bend IN, stated she is a private tutor and works largely with students with problems. Those students largely, unfortunately, come from families with problems. She tries to help her students succeed and come to adult life to work and lead the next 16