Laserfiche WebLink
QCommtttuu Airport <br /> ZONING AND VACATION COMMITTEE <br /> �o tit common Council of tbt city of 0outb 313tutr <br /> The February 14, 1994 meeting of the Zoning and Vacation Committee was called <br /> to order by its Chairperson, Council Member Lee Slavinskas at 4:50 p.m. in the <br /> Council Informal Meeting room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members Luecke, Washington, Kelly, <br /> Puzzello, Slavinskas, Coleman, Duda, and Ladewski; William Eagan, Robert <br /> Nagle, Richard Nussbaum, Joyce Boyler, Charles P. Rice, David Mirkin, Don <br /> Porter, and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand. <br /> The first item on the agenda was to review Resolution No. 9-93 which would <br /> repeal Ord. No. 5539-73 addressing annexation. Council Member Coleman <br /> provided a substitute Bill. <br /> He noted that the original ordinance has lingered in the Court for almost twenty (20) <br /> years. The remonstrance group has continued to stay in touch on this matter. He <br /> noted that this is one of the largest involuntary annexation addressing approximately <br /> 3,450 acres. The law at the time addressed the one-eighth (1/8th) contiguous <br /> boundary criteria. <br /> Council Member Coleman stated that to repeal the ordinance would save the Legal <br /> Department from needless work, would permit a fresh start for annexation. He also <br /> noted that to support this action would not make that individual anti-annexation. <br /> Mr. Nussbaum noted that the City is the defendant in the pending lawsuit and that <br /> the City has not pushed it nor has any Judge. Currently it is pending before Judge <br /> Whitman, and Attorney Don Blackman represents the plaintiffs. If the ordinance in <br /> question is passed this evening,the legal will then file a motion to dismiss. <br /> The ordinance pending before the Court is inconsistent with the current orderly <br /> annexation plan developed by the City. The original ordinance to rescind the <br /> annexation was filed by the administration in part as a leverage tactic with regard to <br /> the Dvorak State Bill. Council Member Luecke noted that by having the annexation <br /> pend in the Court system, that it has prevented other entities from annexing the area <br /> in question. <br /> Following further discussion, Council Member Washington made a motion, <br /> seconded by Council Member Duda, that substitute Bill No. 9-93 be recommended <br /> favorably to Council. The motion passed. <br /> The committee then reviewed Resolution No. 94-9 which is a petition from the <br /> Board of Zoning Appeals for the property located at 420 and 422 North Williams <br /> Street. Mr. Robert Nagel provided background information on this special <br /> exception request. He noted that the public hearing before the Board of Zoning <br /> Appeals was held on January 20, 1994 and sends the request favorably to the <br /> Common Council. <br />