Laserfiche WebLink
almisintito itrpur t <br /> mu hit mumnwn (IIounrti of fir Oltig of$outs Iambi HUMAN RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> The March 20, 1984 meeting of the Human Resources and Economic <br /> Development Committee was called to. order by its Chairman, Councilman <br /> Eugenia Braboy at 5 :05 p.m. in the Council Informal Meeting Room. <br /> Persons in attendance included: Councilmen Puzzello, Zakrzewski, <br /> •Braboy, Voorde, and Taylor, Jeff Gibney, Sandy Combs , Colleen Rosenfeld, <br /> Casey Pocious, Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand and members of the news media. <br /> Councilman Braboy noted that the purpose of the meeting was to hear <br /> presentations on the new guidelines for Community Development money. <br /> Colleen Rosenfeld, the Director of the Community Development Program <br /> then explained the Block Grant Program for 1984. She noted that it is based <br /> on Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, on the <br /> regulations of 24 CFR, Part 570 which were passed on November 1, 1983, and <br /> various HUD memorandums from the Indianapolis area office. <br /> She stressed that CDBG Funds primary objective are to be used for <br /> the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and <br /> a suitable environment and expanding economic opportunities for low and <br /> moderate income families. <br /> Mrs. Rosenfeld noted that for a family of four the median income <br /> qualifying was $20, 700. 00 . She also noted that the median income for a <br /> family of 4 in South Bend is $25 ,900 . <br /> CDGB Funds are designed to benefit low and moderate income persons, <br /> are to aid in the prevention or elimination of slum or blight, and to address <br /> other Community Development needs which have a particular urgency. <br /> Mrs. Rosenfeld then outlined the various types of eligibile activities <br /> which are specifically addressed on pages 2 through 5 of the attached <br /> memorandum. Such activities would include acquisition and disposition of real <br /> property, public facility improvements, clearance demolition and removal of <br /> buildings, public services not to exceed 10% of the annual grant amount, <br /> interim assistance, various rehabilition and preservation activities, special <br /> economic development activities including those for sub-recipients , various <br /> planning and management activities and various administrative costs. <br /> The Committee then reviewed the map of the City showing the boundaries <br /> of the 1984 neighborhood revitalization area (;NRA) , a copy of the map is <br /> found on the last page of the attached memorandum. Mrs. Rosenfeld noted <br /> that within the NRA there were 62.5% of low and moderate income families which <br /> equaled 1/3 of the total City geographically. She noted that since 1982 there <br /> has been no upfront review of proposed activities and instead projects are <br /> monitored. Activities are reviewed by their own design and based on their <br /> own merits. • <br /> Mrs. Rosenfeld then explained the various certifications which are <br /> aimed at assuring compliance.; These -included; financial management, citizen <br /> participation, other resources, relocation acquisition, equal opportunity, <br /> fair housing, labor standards, environmental assessment and historical <br /> preservation. <br /> /11I( •11C.• . ^- PUMAS/41M• CO. <br />