Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Common Council Zoning and Annexation Committee <br /> Minutes form Meeting of March 22, 2004 <br /> The March 22,2004 meeting of the Common Council's Zoning and Annexation Committee <br /> was called to order by its Chairperson, Council Member Ery Kuspa, at 4:12,p.m. in the Council <br /> Informal Meeting Room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members Dieter, Pfeifer, Kelly,Puzzello, Varner, <br /> Kuspa, Coleman,Kirsits and White. Among those also present were Attorney Thomas Walz,City <br /> Clerk John Voorde,Jim Frick(South Gateway Association),Terry Bland(South Bend Tribune),and <br /> Aladean M. DeRose substituting for Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney. <br /> A full quorum of the Committee existed in that all members were present namely,Council <br /> Members Kuspa,Puzzello, Kelly,.and Coleman. <br /> A. Bill No.10-04-Annexation of the 20000-21000 Block of Kern Road/Property <br /> of Duane and Virginia Zeiger. <br /> Chairperson Kuspa reported his receipt of a letter from Larry Magliozzi,South Bend Division <br /> of Community Development, requesting permission to continue hearing on this Bill to April 12, <br /> 2004 in that the Board of Public Safety was unable to approve the Fiscal Plan at its meeting on <br /> March 17,2004. Council Member Coleman made a motion to continue public hearing on Bill No. <br /> 10-04 to the Council's next meeting of April 12,2004. Council Member Kelly seconded the motion <br /> and it passed unanimously. <br /> B. Bill No. 04-29 Resolution Approving Petition for Special Zoning Exception <br /> for Property Located at 1020/1022 South Webster, South Bend,Indiana. <br /> Attorney Thomas Walz made the presentation to the Committee, stating that the Board of <br /> Zoning Appeals made no recommendation as to approval of this special exception. Council Member <br /> White asked Mr.Walz why the BZA made no recommendation. The answer was that the BZA could <br /> not determine whether this was an appropriate special exception. <br /> The initial problem arose because of the original terminology used by the petitioner, i.e. a <br /> request to operate a"Transfer Station." Mr.Walz explained that this terminology was the inaccurate <br /> and unfortunate result of a lay person filling out legal forms(Junoll originally prepared the petition <br /> itself). Mr. Walz informed the Council that the Building Commissioner can impose and enforce <br /> conditions upon the special use. Mr. Walz"further explained that what Junoll Industries actually <br /> wants is the limited right to store occupied containers overnight without transferring contents. He <br /> added that there is a true and necessary justification for this request because landfills have restricted <br /> hours and it is nearly impossible to meet the 3:00 p.m. closing deadline of most landfills. It is Mr. <br /> Walz's further belief that Michigan is moving toward closing landfills from other states. This <br /> company will be more profitable and productive if it is permitted the special exception that it is <br /> seeking. According to Mr. Walz this is blighted property which is being substantially improved. <br />