Laserfiche WebLink
Board met in regular session at 10:00 g. M. All members present. <br />Deferred hearing had on Resolution No. 942 for pavement on Michigan <br />treet from a point 0 ft. nor � f th a rthh line of Fairview Avenue 4 Cit Limits* <br />n the a: eve met er r. Qs & * M Henr a ear a but no wr_ n amen t nce <br />ileac upon op $�u oonJ�i� t�o ne l�'. �iamm d p�es �u io was mo�i�ie� as follows: <br />ri mo e Ry Yl�minating � at par o tie pavement running <br />from the south line of Bonmoyer Avenue to -the City,Limits. The balance of the resolution <br />"from a point forty feet north of the north line of Fairview Avenue to the South line <br />of Donmoyer Avenue" is hereby confirmed, and the Board being fully advisees in the <br />premises decides that the benefits to property liabbe to be assessed, Por'_said'' <br />ImproVer-ents are equal to the estimated cost of the same, as -reported by the City <br />--Civil Engineer, and thereupon takes finaljaction on said resolution as modified, and the <br />same is hereby in all things, ratified,- confirmed and approved as modified. <br />Resolved further that notioes be published on the 6th. day of April 1922 <br />and the 13th.-day of April 922 in theSouth Bend News Times and South bend Tribune <br />and on the 7th. day of April; 1922 in the tnd.i.anEpn.iis Star stating that this Board <br />will receive bids for the construction of said -improvements up to 10:00 A.M. Tuesday <br />April 25th., 1922. The Board reserves'the.right torejectany and all bids. <br />a Board instructed City Engineer to -prepare new resolution for that part <br />of Michigan Street from South line of Donmoyer Avenue to South City Limits for Wednesday <br />April 5tn.,.1922 at 9:00 A.F. <br />i City Engineer F. J. Anderson appeared before the Board ana.took up matter - <br />of no,.sewer connection on Lbt 11 Studebaker's Add. owned by Mrs. Witucki and stated <br />reeorc s. of. city snowed no `tap at this location. The Board agreed av to he 'd tap--inst&11e-d <br />Councilman'Sid. Thornton appeared bfore the Board in regard to"petition <br />for pipepsewerron Georgianne Avenue and Board ordered resolution prepared. <br />Attorney George Omacht representing George Hoffman appeared before the <br />Board and ppresented petition as follows, which was referred tQ the City Attorney for <br />investigation and -report. <br />t South Bend, Indiana April <br />4th.9 1922. <br />To the Ronorable Board of Public Works,' <br />of ,the City of South Bend, Indiana, PETIR'IO. <br />Gentlemens+- � <br />aeorge,i.i Hoffman, the undersigned petitioner would show your <br />honorable Board that on November 2,1�21 your Board confirmed an assessment roll humbered <br />1286 for eight inch concrete pavem , an Emeriek Street from Cro ce t Avenue to orby <br />Street under Improvement Resolution Number;88q adopteon-June i4,921, that be ore <br />said confirmation of said assessment "roll ¢s f ad Dctober l9 1921 was codified so that <br />the assessments of.lots 8.r10 and ll on said roll ease modified so that the assessments <br />of 1,ota,8-10 end 11 on said -roll were confirmed in a gross sum against each lot and again& <br />Staples & Hildebrand company and the Michi'an Central Railroad Company, as their various <br />interest ;:cosy appear: ' : that at the time of tKe conf irdation of said assessment roll the said <br />Staples -Hildebrand tempany and they said Vichigan-Ceptral Railroad Company were the owners <br />of divided part&::df said lot 8 and ;likewide- of said lots 10 and 11. <br />That theie.cannot be determined from said assessment roll; <br />'(1)' The 'rmspeetiv6; aMOdUt Of part of tho= total assessment S9 inst each <br />��.� of said lots which word intended to-belasse.ssed against the Staples -Hildebrand Company <br />and the Michigan' Central Railroad' CemptnF..: <br />' {2) ..%he ftspective ppa�nes of each of said lots 8-10 and 11 which -the <br />said'Staples-Hildebrand Company andthe Michigan Central Railroad Company owned at the <br />time of said assessment. <br />That ; thereforo thb assessment set out in said assessment roll on <br />said lots 8-1Q and 11 are and always have.been invalid and cannot be enforced. <br />Therefore your petitioner rays that the said defects in said <br />ass ssments for lots 8-10 and 11. be remedied akd`that supplemental proceedings be begs <br />immediately With that purpose. - <br />Very truly yours, <br />FILED <br />•APRIL 491922.. <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS. <br />,BY L. B. SLAUGHTER <br />President.. <br />Referred to City Attorney. <br />GERRGE J. HOFFMAN <br />BY GEORGE W. OMACHT. <br />