My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6B(1)
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2011
>
05-10-11 Packet
>
6B(1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 4:19:28 PM
Creation date
5/11/2011 4:32:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6 g () <br />f�pUTiI q� <br />• r a n • u rn <br />Community & Economic Development`` °� <br />. I80 <br />1200 County -City Building, 227 West Jefferson, South Bend, Indiana 46601 -1830 Phone 574/235 -9371 Fax 574/235 -9021 <br />To: Redevelopment Commission <br />From: David Relos, Economic Development Planner 0it' <br />Subject: Relocation costs for Sinco Pool <br />Date: May 10, 2011 <br />This is the staff report for additional expenses related to the relocation of Sinco Pool from <br />East Sample Street to the corner of South Michigan and Dayton Streets. On November 02, <br />2010, the Commission approved Resolution No. 2786 for the acquisition and relocation of <br />this long standing business. As it was understood at the time, the amount requested by the <br />owner was adequate for their relocation, which was acquired and relocated for Ivy Tech's <br />much needed expansion. <br />While going through the process of getting the needed permits for their relocation, the Fire <br />Department raised issues with the chemicals used by Sinco. Because the Department <br />could not explicitly tell Sinco what issues needed to be dealt with, Sinco had to hire an <br />outside firm to sort through the State and Local regulations. <br />In addition, Sinco had to install additional items not originally planned, including fire <br />suppression and monitoring equipment. These requirements have substantially hindered <br />Sinco's move to their new location, and have cost Sinco $6,884 in extra costs. Under our <br />relocation policy, these costs would have been included in the amount paid. <br />Staff believes Sinco put forth their best efforts in estimating the amount needed to relocate, <br />and requests approval of these minimal additional costs. <br />What We Do Today Makes A Difference! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.