HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdvisory Street Re-Naming Committee ReportADVISORY STREET RE- NAMING COMMITTEE
Robert E Smith
Samuel Brown
Charlotte Pfeifer
Cheri Richmond
Debra Walker
John Charles Bryant
Sidney Blanchet
The report and recommendation is enclosed. You may contact Robert E Smith, 574- 855 -0609 regarding
any concerns.
Filed in Clerk's Office
JUL 2 5 2016
KAREEMAH FOWLER
CITY CLERK, SOUTH SEND, IN
t 1
Street Renaming Advisory Committee
Report
The Street Renaming Committee was initiated by Council Resolution 4443 -15. Committee
assignments were made by the Council and the Mayor. Members met and got acquainted in
November and December 2015. During that meeting the expectations of Council Resolution
4443 -15 and the November 12, 2015 fetter from the Mayor were reviewed. The expectations
from the review are:
• Review the impact on residents and :businesses on any proposed route
• identify Streets that are potentials to be renamed for Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr.
• Solicit Public input through several public meetings
The committee was briefed on how the current Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. came about.
The briefing was provided by Debra Walker, who was an active committee participant from
the previous Street Renaming Committee. The following is a summary of her verbal report:
Several streets were recommended; a public meeting was held on each street that was
recommended, the process was later changed to include a canvas cif the street that was
recommended. In addition, the rules also changed during the process from a majority of
people in favor of a change to the street name would be changed to where if one person
objected no change would take place. The process took a few months to complete and due
to personal verbal attacks /threats on the committee and the former mayor. The current
street was identified and the name of Dr. King was placed on a street that was 3 blocks in
length with no one living on the street.
Having been appraised of the past history, it was decided to identify a street to present at
the public meetings. Each committee member voted on their street of .choice. The criteria
used in selecting a street was one of substantial length, one that would be maintained
during the February 2016 meeting. and one that had the potential of future development.
A survey sheet (see attached) was developed to capture and document the responses of
people at the public meetings. The purpose of the survey was to identify if participants
were in favor of a street named in honor of Dr. King, if the recommended street was
acceptable or identify a street of their own selection. This method would eliminate the
issue of continuous public meetings with changing requirements for each street that was
identified. This process was used during the time of the first committee that was
established to rename a street for Dr. King. The result was to delay or avoid making a
1
decision that resulted in naming the current street, that the majority of residents are not
happy with and thus we are repeating the process again.
We need to celebrate our evolving history, since Chapin settled South Send, Slavery has
been abolished, women have gained the right to vote, Studebaker produced automobiles
and we have had the civil rights movement.
Public Meetings
Five widely attended public meetings were held at the following locations:
March 1, 2016 from 5:30 — 6 :30pm Charles Martin Center
March 3, 2016 from 5:30 — 6 :30pm Rum Village Nature Center
March 15, 2016 from 5:30 — 6 :30pm Charles Black Center
March 24. 2016 from 5:30 — 6:30pm Martin Luther King Center
March 29, 2016 from 6:00 — 7:00pm Robinson Community Learning Center
Council members Tim Scott and Regina - Williams Preston attend one meeting each.
People expressed their opinions and completed the survey form. People used the public
meetings to discuss issues with city government, budget and past street naming activities
This was expected and several times at each meetings people were reminded of the subject
such that we could stay on track.
Survey Results
Survey results are contained in the Survey Results attachment. There are a few points that
need explanations.
1. An electronic survey form was used by some. The electronic form was developed
and managed by the City Clerks Office using the Survey Monkey software
application. The electronic survey form indicates that 282 people responded to the
survey.
2. The survey results of both the electronic form and the paper form indicate that
Western Avenue is the street that people want to be named for Dr. King.
-3. On both forms the selection of other does not match the actual number of other
streets name.
4. Unknown to the committee an unaffiliated petition was turned in to the City Clerk
Office after the closing date of public meetings and comments.
2
5. The electronic survey form indicated 107 people in favor of naming a street in honor
of Dr. King and 175 against having a street named for Dr. King. Of the 175 against,
94 people identified other means of honoring Dr. King and 61 identified a street to
be named in honor of Dr. King.
The two streets receiving the most votes to be named in honor of Dr. King are:
• Western Avenue 47 Votes
• Expand The Existing Dr. King Dr. 43 Votes
Concerns Raised at The Public Meeting
The concerns raised at the public meetings are identified below
• Expense of Completing Address Change forms for the Post Office
+ Cost of Stationary /Business Cards
• Web Page (change postal address)
• Business Customer notification
• Change of address on business vehicles
• Changes to internal business documents
• Changes to Mortgage Documents
• Changes to medical documents
• Historical Concerns
• The name of the street is too long
Responses to Concerns
The responses to the concerns raised at the public meetings are as follows:
• The expense of malting an address change was answered by the committee. After
continued concern over this issue, Chris Corder from the South Bend postal Service
attended the meeting at the MLK Recreation Center and informed the public that
the Post Office has an existing process in place to address street name changes. The
process involves an electronic data base application that matches the old street
3
name with the new street name. This process results in mail being routed to the new
street name with the resident or business owner requesting a change of address at
the post office. The Post Office does not have a time limit on the process but they
hope that within 18 months a change of address form would be completed. This
information from the Post Office Employee was not warmly received.
• In response to mortgage documents having to be changed, Ann Mannix stated that
mortgage documents do not have to be changed if the street name changes. Ann is
familiar with mortgages, address changes and etc. The information was not warmly
received.
• In response to changes of address to Medical documents, the resident notifies the
medical provider of the address change. Changes are made by the medical provider.
• The historical concern identified by the Historical Commission has no bearing on the
street name. Naming of streets is outside the Commission responsibility. H. Chapin
never lived on Chapin street. His house and a park named for him are located blocks
away. There is historical significance to Afro- Americans and Chapin Street that is
documented in the book Better Homes of South Bend authored by Gabrielle
Robinson.
• In response to the expense of changing stationary by a businesses or individual,
changes to a web page for business address and signage on vehicles is a concern.
The concern expressed at the public meetings was based on urgency and cost. The
concern over urgency can be reduced by providing plenty of notice for the change.
• In response to the name of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr street name being too long, the
street name could be abbreviated as Dr. MLK Drive
Analysis of Survey and Public Meetings
An analysis of the survey(s) and the public meetings is necessary. Two factors. dominated the
public meetings and the survey forms (1) not in my back yard and (Z) race.
The consensus sentiment expressed at the public meetings were in favor of a street named to
honor Dr. King by a vote of 41 to 11 but put it someplace else. There were at total of 46 votes
for other streets to be named in honor of Dr. King. The 46 votes for other streets were more
than the 41 in favor of a street named for Dr. King. By this comparison it can be concluded that
people want a street named in honor of Dr. King but not the recommended street.
The electronic survey forms documented the majority were not in favor of a street to honor Dr.
King 175 against and 107 for a street. Within that same majority who were not in favor of a
street to honor Dr. King, 94 indicated another street of the 94 only 61 identified another street.
This shows that 33 people indicated another means of honoring King, however most did not
4
identify any specifics. This comparison also indicates a street is acceptable but not in my
backyard. There was the appearance of voter tampering, many of the electronic voting surveys
had the same responses.
The two survey results do show conflict however the electronic survey results high lite a term
called "not in my back yard ". During the 1960's the term "not in my back yard" was coined to
identify government and community projects that people were in favor of but they dial not
want them in their area or on their street. This sentiment is quite normal but it can be taken to
the extreme where a community may lose out on an opportunity.
The elephant in the room was race. This was exhibited by the following comments;
• Where are the white people?
• Put the street in a black only neighborhood
• The street name will attract black people and crime
• During two meetings we had to pause the meeting to let the participant know that the
comments made to each other were racial
• During the wrap up meeting the three business owners acknowledged that race was
involved in some concerns
The attitude of "not in my backyard" and having race enter the discussion of naming a
street are facts of life. During the 1960's government leaders discovered that when thy
make a decision, the attitude of "not in my back yard" dissipates over time.
The concern for racial justice and social injustice can only be addressed by strong
leadership. However, these two should not guide decision making. A leader has to step
forward and make the right decision.
Recommendation
During the public meeting a consensus could not be reached on a particular street. The Street
Renaming Committee recommends-the following streets. Item one is the initial
recommendation by the committee. The Western Avenue was identified during the public
meetings and on the survey forms.
1. Extending the existing Dr. Martin Luther ICng Dr. north on Marion to Michigan Street,
and extending it south to Wester and south on Prairie Street to the city limits.
2. Western Avenue was the street identified in both surveys.
5
Due to the appearance of voter tampering another online survey could be done which would
require the voter to enter their name on the survey. This would help to ensure the one vote
per person rule.
it is strongly recommended that no more committees be established to rename a street for Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. Feedback received from many individuals for and against the
recommended street are looking for a decision. The lack of a decision is similar to an infection
that is untreated and it festers. It's time fora decision.
0
Advisory Street Re- Naming Committee
On May 14, 2015, Mayor Pete Buttigieg signed Common Council Resolution 4443 -15 to
create a 7- member Advisory Street Re- Naming Committee composed of four Common
Council appointees and three Mayoral appointees. The committee's charge is to oversee
a public process to consider renaming a street to honor the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr.
Please answer the questions below.
Question 1: Are you in favor of renaming a street in South Bend after Rev. Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr.? Please check your choice below.
r- Yes
h No, because
Ivey
FWashington
• �y
�d
�s
4luJ. HEREItar.rt f1n�xRfrat5 E+v'IrJU::ar.Nt,�a
Question 2: If yes for Question 1, please pick
from the following:
r Expand the current Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr. Drive to Michigan Street (i.e. the current
Marion Street) in the North and to the Bypass
(i.e. the current Chapin Street and Prairie
Avenue) in the South as illustrated on the left.
Other
Robert E. Smith I Samuel Brown I Charlotte Pfeffer I Cheri R. Richmond I Debra Walker I John Charles Bryant I Sidney Blanchet
Advisory Street Re- Naming Committee
SURVEY RESULTS
Electronic Survey Survey Forms
(Survey Monkey)
Are you in favor of renaming a street in
South Bend for Rev. Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr?
Yes 107 41
No 175 11
If yes to question 1, Do you favor expand
the current Dr. Martin Luther King Jr Drive
Expand 37 6
Other 94
Other streets identified (SEE NOTE 1)
Western
23
24
Laporte
20
6
Lombardy
5
1
Sample
4
Lincoln Way West
4
10
Williams
2
South Bend Ave
1
Main Street
1
Michigan Street
1
Ignition Park
1
Bendix
1
Round -A -Bout
1
By -Pass
2
Total Other
61
46
NOTE 1
The reponses to OTHER was not always
a street name.