HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Minutes 9/4/09 MeetingSOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
September 4, 2009
10:00 a.m.
Presiding: Marcia I. Jones, President
1. ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Legal Counsel:
227 West Jefferson Boulevard
South Bend, Indiana
Ms. Marcia Jones, President
Dr. David Varner, Vice President
Ms. Nancy King, Secretary
Mr. Greg Downes
Mr. Donald Alford
Ms. Stephanie Spivey
Mr. Charles S. Leone, Esq.
Mr. Lawrence Meteiver, Esq.
Redevelopment Staff: Mr. Don Inks, Director
Mrs. Cheryl Phipps, Recording Secretary
Mr. Bill Schalliol, Economic Development Specialist
Mr. David Relos, Economic Development Specialist
Ms. Debrah Jennings, Property Manager
Others Present: Mr. Tom Price, Mayor's Office
Mr. Hardie Blake, Project hnpact
Mr. James Summers, Project Impact
Dr. Thomas Merluzzi, Notre Dame
Ms. Beth Leonard
Mr. Jeff Parrott, South Bend Tribune
Ms. GlendaRae Hernandez
Ms. Linda Wolfson, Community Forum for Economic Dev
Ms. Mo Miller
Mr. Mark Seaman
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of Minutes of the Rescheduled
Regular Meeting of Wednesday, September 26,
2009.
Upon a IllOtlOn by MI-. DOVI'neS, SeCOnded by MS. COMMISSION APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE
Kmg and UnanllnOUSly Carned, the CominlsslOn RESCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING OF
approved the Minutes of the Rescheduled Regular WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2009
Meeting of Wednesday, September 26, 2009.
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Redevelopment Commission Claims submitted September 4, 2009 for approval.
305 FUND SBCDA BOND
The Troyer Group
10,391.50 WNIT
324 AIRPORT AEDA
South Bend Parks & Recreation
Phifer Environmental Services, LLC
DHA
420 FUND TIF DISTRICT-SBCDA GENERAL
AMPCO System Parking
South Bend Parks & Recreation
Ziolkowski Construction, Inc.
422 TIF DISTRICT WEST WASHINGTON
South Bend Parks & Recreation
Kaser Spraker Construction
Kaser Spraker Construction
Kaser Spraker Construction
8,475.00 Mowing
3,300.00 IVY Tech
2,220.00
2,082.79
780.00 Mowing
10,633.00 The Vine Repair Terra Cotta Repair
150.00 Mowing
32,485.25 Natatorium
5,709.50 Natatorium, Ph II Program Delivery
24,609.75 Natatorium to Cover Interior
$ 100,836.79
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by Mr. Varner
and unanimously eai7-ied, the Commission approved the
Claims submitted September 4, 2009, and ordered
checks to be released.
4. COMMUNICATIONS
There were no Communications.
5. OLD BUSINESS
There was no Old Business.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. South Bend Central Development Area
(1) First Amendment to Development
Agreement for Easement between South
Bend Redevelopment Commission and
COMMISSION APPROVED THE CLAIMS
SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 4, 2009, AND ORDERED
THE CHECKS TO BE RELEASED
THERE WERE NO COMMUNICATIONS
THERE WAS NO OLD BUSINESS
2
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
Michiana Public Broadcasting
Corporation.
Mr. Meteiver noted that the Redevelopment
Commission and WHIT are parties to a
development agreement dated May 5, 2008.
The agreement is related to the premises
located at 300 W. Jefferson Blvd., the former
WSBT building. WNIT also executed an
agreement for easement whereby WNIT
conveyed to the Commission an easement of
the facade of that building so the
Commission could fund and construct
improvements to the facade.
The Board of Public Works has just held its
preconstruction meeting with the successful
bidder on the project and will be issuing a
notice to proceed soon. We anticipate a
construction period of 210 construction days
which will take construction beyond
expiration of the current agreement. This
agreement is necessary to modify the terms
and conditions of the agreement and
easement to avoid a default situation.
Staff recommends approval of the First
Amendment to Development Agreement for
Easement and the Amended Agreement for
Easement with Michiana Public
Broadcasting.
Mr. Varner asked if the development
agreement still includes the Jumbotron. Mr.
Metiever responded that it does.
Mr. Downes made a motion to approve the
First Amendment to Development
Agreement for Easement between the South
Bend Redevelopment Commission and
Michiana Public Broadcasting. Mr. Alford
seconded the motion. The motion carried on
COMMISSION APPROVED THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR EASEMENT BETWEEN SOUTH BEND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND MICHIANA
PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
a vote of four in favor; Mr. Varner voted
nay.
(2) Amended Agreement for Easement with
Michiana Public Broadcasting
Corporation.
Mr. Downes made a motion to approve the
Amended Agreement for Easement with
Michiana Public Broadcasting Corporation.
Mr. Alford seconded the motion. The motion
carried on a vote of four in favor; Mr. Varner
voted nay.
B. Airport Economic Development Area
(1) Proposal for agreement for new telephone
system for Blackthorn Golf Course.
Mr. Inks noted that the total cost for the new
telephone phone system is just over $3,600.
The cun-ent telephone system works
intermittently. Consequently, the golf course
is losing business when people try to call and
cannot get through. We would like to move
as quickly as possible to remedy the
situation. Three quotes were sought. AT&T
was the lowest quote. This will be paid from
Blackthorn's capital budget. not TIF funds.
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by
Ms. King and unanimously carried, the
Commission accepted the proposal fi•om
AT&T for a new telephone system for
Blackthorn Golf Course for the scope of
services and fee proposed.
(2) Staff report on TCU notice and offer to
Redevelopment Commission regarding
SASCO loan.
Mr. Inks noted that in 1999, to facilitate the
COMMISSION APPROVED THE AMENDED
AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT WITH MICHIANA
PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION
COMMISSION ACCEPTED THE PROPOSAL FROM
AT&T FOR A NEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR
BLACKTHORN GOLF COURSE FOR THE SCOPE OF
SERVICES AND FEE PROPOSED
4
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
purchase and move of Studebaker Auto Parts
inventory, the Redevelopment Connnission
took a note fi-om SASCO in the amount of
$150,000. TCU is now offering to buy the
debt instrument, security and risk guarantee
and related documents for the amount of
$10,000. That same $10,000 is being made
to other subordinated lenders, including the
Industrial Revolving Fund and Mr. Geoff
Newman. The IRF made an initial loan of
$200,000; Mr. Newman had a $100,000 loan.
The cun-ent balance on the Redevelopment
Commission's loan is $141.741. The first
few payments were made on the loan; then
payments became erratic and ceased after
September 2001. Currently, only the senior
lender (TCU) is receiving payments and has
a balance of $977,352. TCU has been
receiving interest-only payments and that at a
reduced interest rate.
TCU has notified the Redevelopment
Commission of its intent to sell the collateral
to the highest qualified bidder, in public, on
September 15, 2009. The Commission has a
right to an accounting of the unpaid
indebtedness secured by the property for a
charge of $150. Staff believes that the value
of the inventory is less t11an the amount owed
TCU. The inventory was originally
purchased for $850,000. Relocation costs
going back to that time period were in the
$1.SM range. It was a self move. SASCO
moved across the street from the jail site to
the cun-ent location. We have received recent
estimates to move the inventory in the $.7M
to $ l M dollar range. We just believe there is
no value in the inventory.
Some would probably argue that the
collection of Studebaker Auto Parts is
in-eplaceable, but its real economic value is
5
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
determined by what it can be sold for.
Historically, the sale of these parts has not
generated sufficient profits to keep cur•ent on
the loans that are due. Accordingly, Mr. Inks
believes the value of the Commission's
before the asset sale is $0. After the sale of
the parts inventory, there will be no assets
that the Commission could pursue on the
loan. The unsecured personal guarantee also
has little, if any value, and would require
additional time and expense to pursue.
Based on a review of personal financial
information, it appears there is nothing to
pursue. The staff recommendation is to
accept the offer fi•om TCU in the amount of
$10,000 and we would further recommend
the Commission authorize payment of $150
for an accounting from TCU of the unpaid
indebtedness secured by the property being
sold. While we all have every confidence in
TCU carrying out the sale in everyone's best
interest, as a public entity we should
probably have on record an accounting of
that sale.
Staff recommends accepting the offer of
$10,000 and to have the accounting of sale at
$150.
Mr. Downes asked how soon the building
would be vacant. Mr. Inks responded that
staff is hoping it will be vacant the end of
January. Staff is currently having demolition
specifications written, with the intent of
going out to bid near the end of the year for
demolition.
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by
Mr. Alford and unanimously carried, the
Commission accepted the offer fi•om
Teachers Credit Union in the amount of
$10,000 and authorized payment of $150 for
COMMISSION ACCEPTED THE OFFER FROM
TEACHERS CREDIT UNION IN THE AMOUNT OF
1 0,000 AND AUTHORIZED PAYMENT OF $ t SO
FOR AN ACCOUNTING OF THE SALE FROM
TEACHERS CREDIT UNION
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
an accounting of the sale from Teachers
Credit Union.
(3) Update on Project Impact Performance
Mr. SU111111erS noted that the CO11n111SS1011 UPDATE ON PROJECT IMPACT PERFORMANCE
provided a grant to Project Impact to launch
a job readiness training initiative to serve the
needs of businesses in the Airport Economic
Development Area (AEDA) and Urban
Enterprise Zone (UEZ), and to recruit and
train potential employees from the increasing
population of ex-offenders returning to the
conmlunity in need of employment as well as
other hard core unemployed.
The methodology of the initiative is to
provide life skills and job readiness training,
identify the employment needs of businesses
located within the AEDA and UEZ, an•ange
for the employees to receive technical job
skills training, and provide job coaches to
mentor and support employees after hiring.
Project hnpact was clear about the
participation criteria. The program was
meant for hard to employ people. Applicants
were given an orientation, stressing the level
of commitment necessary and then attended a
five-day boot camp to weed out those not
serious about making changes to their lives
and behavior. Even after those qualifiers,
there were nearly twice as many participants
as Mr. Summers and Mr. Blake had
anticipated. Eighty-two participants have
taken training; sixty-three have graduated
fi•om the program; fifty-three participants had
felonies; twenty-three live within the AEDA
or UEZ; sixteen participants are working
(some of those while still training); and six
companies fi•onl the UE or AEDA are
employing the participants or graduates.
7
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
Though participation and graduation have
exceeded original goals, the percentage of
participants residing in the AEDA or UEZ
has not reached the goal of 50%. As of now,
the rate is 40%.
Mr. Downes asked how many of the 4I jobs
are full time. Mr. Summers responded that
16 are full time.
Ms. King asked if Project Impact is still
trying to find jobs for those graduates who do
not have jobs. Mr. Summers responded that
they are.
Ms. King asked if any of the graduates have
participated in the Apprentice Academy or
Ivy Tech additional training. Mr. Summers
responded that they have been given the
Facilities Maintenance training from Ivy
Tech and some are still in the Machinist
training, that is more advanced. A couple
more have gone on to take classes at Ivy
Tech. Several others are trying to get into
classes at Ivy Tech.
Mr. Summers noted that one of the key
elements of the Project Impact program is the
ongoing support they provide after
graduation. Two counselors follow up with
participants weekly, either by telephone or
face to face, even if the participants are
incarcerated. The jail has been so impressed
with Project Impact's support and
intervention they have requested a regular
presentation be offered at the jail for other
iml~ates.
Part of the support to the client is to have a
relationship with the entire family. The
reinforcement from the family helps keep the
participant on track. Also, several
8
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
psychologists also provide support, as
needed. Participants also receive economic
and entrepreneurship training, job interview
rehearsals, post-hire counseling to move up
to better jobs; and refen•als to services from a
variety of community non-profit
organizations as needed.
Mr. Swnmers provided a large list of
companies that Project Impact is contacting
as potential employers for their clients.
Ms. King asked what the requirement is in
our contract for these funds in teens of the
target area. How many participants are
supposed to be from the UEZ and how many
are to be employed in the UEZ? Ms.
Leonard responded that the contract goal is to
have 50% of job placements be residents of
the UEZ. The law actually says that 50% of
the job openings have to be made available to
residents of the UEZ. The law allows
employers to be from location, though the
program is concentrating on AEDA
employers.
Ms. King asked about the nature of the jobs
where participants have been placed: are they
jobs that provide a living wage? Mr.
Summers responded that the sixteen full time
jobs do. Some are above minimum wage.
Mr. Summers will provide the Commission
with a breakdown of wages for the employed
graduates.
Ms. King noted that at the start of the
program, there was great optimism that
Project Impact would not need TIF funds for
the second year. Does Project Impact still
expect that? Mr. Summers responded that
they are working still toward that goal. They
have two grant writers who have been
9
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
applying for grants. That is one reason the
program is concentrating on new job
creation: to have other sources of revenue in
order to become self-sustaining. Most grant
funds are aimed at helping youth. There are
not a whole lot of people who are excited
about helping adults who have made a
mistake.
Ms. Jones asked if Mr. Summers talks with
potential employers about supporting the
program financially. Mr. Summers
responded that he does. However, Project
hnpact needs to show a real return on
investment, that the workers they provide are
not a problem, but a benefit. Then, there is a
list of various ways employers can provide
investment, from supplying trainers all the
way up to significant financial contributions.
Mr. Summers is still very confident Project
Impact will be able to use return on
investment as an incentive with employers.
He noted that employers are always surprised
that he is not looking for a handout, or for
them to do something that puts their
organization at risk.
Mr. Downes asked if there aren't restrictions
resulting from the TIF dollars used to fund
Project Impact that require a certain portion
of the employers to be from the AEDA. Mr.
Inks responded that the program was
designed to help residents of the UEZ. There
is another portion of state law that allows the
Commission to work with individual
businesses, but we're not using that now.
Mr. Downes asked Mr. Summers to include
in his report next time the number of
employed clients who are residents of UEZ.
Mr. Summers said that he would.
10
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
Ms. King asked to see financial reports on
the expenditure of TIF funds. Mr. Summers
said he would provide that also.
C. West Washington-Chapin Development Area
There was no business in the West Washington-
Chapin Development Area.
D. South Side Development Area
There was no business in the South Side
Development Area.
E. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area
There was no business in the Northeast
Neighborhood Development Area.
F. Douglas Road Economic Development Area
(1) Access Agreement with Douglas Road
Retail Partners.
Mr. Schalliol noted that these Access
Agreements allow the city and its agents to
access property owned by the Douglas Road
Partnership and the Douglas Road Retail
partners to construct and improve a drive that
is on private property. The private drive,
known as Market Place Drive, is the entrance
drive for Memorial Home Care on the north
and Brown Mackie College on the south at
the signalized intersection of Douglas and
S.R. 23. The Access Agreements are only
for work on the north side of Market Place
Drive.
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by
Mr. Vainer and unanimously carried, the
Commission approved the Access Agreement
with Douglas Road Retail Partners.
COMMISSION APPROVED THE ACCESS
AGREEMENT WITH DOUGLAS ROAD RETAIL
PARTNERS
11
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
(2) Access Agreement with Douglas Road
Partners and Memorial Home Care.
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by COMMISSION APPROVED THE Access
MI'. Varney and UnarilrilOUSly Carried, the AGREEMENT WITH DOUGLAS ROAD PARTNERS
C0111n11SSlOll apprOVed the Access AgI'eelllent AND MEMORIAL HOME CARE
with Douglas Road PaI-tners and Memorial
Home Care.
G. Ratification of Service Contracts
Commission
Role in Contract Staff
Property Description Transaction Contractor Service Provided Amount Member
912 S Lafayette, Acquisition Jerome Michaels Appraisal $1,385
Airgas Great Lakes Relos
Inc
912 S Lafayette, Acquisition Ralph Lauver Appraisal $1,350 Relos
Airgas Great Lakes
Inc
912 S Lafayette, Acquisition Pfifer Environ- Phase IEnviron- $1,400 Relos
Airgas Great Lakes mental mental
Inc
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by Ms
King and unanimously carried, the Commission
ratified the Service Contracts approved since
August August 26, 2009.
H. Ratification of Temporary Use Agreement
COMMISSION RATIFIED THE SERVICE
CONTRACTS APPROVED SINCE AUGUST
AUGUST 26.2009
Use/Agency Lot Event Dates of Use
Spark Design Studio 121 S. Michigan,
Michigan Street Shops Renovation of retail space 90 days, beginning
August 28, 2009
Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by Ms.
King and unanimously carried, the Commission
ratified the Temporary Use Agreement with Spark
Design Studio.
COMMISSION RATIFIED THE TEMPORARY
USE AGREEMENT b1'ITH SPARK DESIGN
STUDIO
12
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting -September 4, 2009
7. PROGRESS REPORTS
There WaS n0 I'ep01't. PROGRESS REPORTS
8. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING
The next meeting of the Redevelopment Commission is NEXT COMMISSION MEETING
scheduled for Friday, September 18, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the ADJOURNMENT
Redevelopment Commission, the meeting was adjourned
at 10:53 a.m.
Donald E. Inks, Director
1J