HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-17-09 Community and Economic Development Committee~6'
a-~ ~) ~,
~)%~`~~
~`Y ~ COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MARCH 17, 2009
Committee Members Present: Timothy Rouse, Chairperson; Ann Puzzello;
Henry Davis present at 7:00 p.m.
Other Council Members Present: Derek Dieter; David Varner
Others Present: School Superintendent Jim Kapsa; School Board Members Sniadecki,
Spivey, Bergeron, Chamber of Commerce Reps. Phil DaMico and Paul
Laskowski; City Attorney Chuck Leone; Don Inks; Martha Lewis; George
Lane; Jamie Loo; Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand; Roger Hamburg
Agenda: Further discussion on Bill No. 09-19. This was a resolution set for Public
Hearing at the March 9th meeting of the Council where it was continued
to the meeting of March 23, 2009.
The resolution filed on Wednesday, March 5, 2009 asked the Redevelopment Commission to
defer action on consideration of using TIF funds to supplement the financial package for the New
Tech High School proposal at Marycrest. Subsequently, on Friday, March 6, 2009 the
Redevelopment Commission voted to support the use of TIF funds by a 3-2 vote preempting the
Council's scheduled Public Hearing of March 9, 2009. On March 9, 2009 the bill was continued
until the March 23, 2009 meeting and this meeting of March 17, 2009 was set for more
information and discussion.
Community & Economic Development Committee Chairperson, Tim Rouse opened the meeting
stating the Council's overall support for the Tech High School concept; but felt many questions
remained especially regarding the chosen Marycrest site and sustainable funding.
Councilmember Varner echoed these comments and felt, as the Council's representative to the
Redevelopment Commission, he would try to explain the Commissions vote from his perception.
He explained it was presented to the Redevelopment Commission a sense of urgency. It was
deemed critical to the school corporation moving forward to know whether the city would commit
$1.3 million in TIF funds this year and $1.6 next year. Councilmember Varner preferring to defer
a vote until more information was available ultimately voted against the use of TIF dollars.
Councilmember Rouse added that he was disappointed the Redevelopment Commission were
not present at this meeting.
Council President Derek Dieter added that he was more than disappointed. He was perturbed.
Dieter went on to ask Don Inks, Director of Economic Development, if there were any answers to
questions asked in the Bill 09-19.
Specifically, Dieter wanted to know who paid for the air quality testing at Marycrest. Inks said the
costs were picked up by the city's Engineering Department with the understanding they would be
reimbursed by TIF. Rouse asked if this was normal procedure and Inks said yes.
Tim Rouse then turned to School Superintendent Jim Kapsa who was to provide an update on
the New Tech High School proposal. Mr. Kapsa provided a handout (see attached) which
detailed the developments since the New Tech H.S. proposal was unveiled. Rouse interjected
that because the Redevelopment Commission did not delay, the questions in the resolution were
sent directly to Kapsa who responded by letter dated March 16th.
Kapsa proceeded. He apologized for the answers in the letter being so general. The real
question he said was why the rush? He said due to the high start-up costs, the ever changing
financial backing and the desire to begin in August 2009 time was of the essence. Several tough
decisions needed to be made by the 24th of March if the proposal was to proceed. Again, those
decisions were opening in '09 or'10. Where? Long-term funding?
Tim Rouse expressed concern the "due diligence" had not been done making it unwise to commit
tax dollars to the project. Beyond the stated Kapsa request of nearly $3 million in TIF dollars in
the next 2 years, Varner worried about along-term financial commitment of T1F dollars. Varner
also wondered if space could be found in another facility in the school system.
Kapsa and Paul Laskowski both explained all studies have indicated that a separate facility was
best. Kapsa asked if the Council would commit TIF dollars if a site other than Marycrest were
chosen?
Rouse said Council support is solid for the concept; however, there was reluctance to pledge
dollars without "due diligence."
Chairperson Rouse then opened the public portion of the session.
Mrs. Andres questioned whether this program was an appropriate use of TIF funds. School
Board Member Bill Sniadecki said the School Corporation should proceed cautiously. He felt
Marycrest was a bad choice and opening should be in 2010.
Councilmember Rouse asked what role the Chamber of Commerce Reps Laskowski and Damico
played? Laskowski said he as Vice-President of the Chamber was asked to co-chair a study of
the New Tech concept.
School Board Member Stephanie Spivey said more info was needed to make informed decisions.
George Lane questioned whether the City and School Corporation could afford the program. He
cautioned the Council not to be pushed into a quick decision.
Both Paul Laskowski and Jim Kapsa spoke of the New Tech High School taking a new approach
to education. Project based learning would be stressed. All skills would be developed allowing a
"team approach" to problem solving. These are the skills needed in today's workplace. That is
why the Chamber was playing a prominent role in the New Tech High School proposal.
Councilmember Rouse summed up by saying he recognized the Chamber's interest. They would
be concerned about preparing tomorrow's workforce for the new economy. Rouse then said the
Council's issue was who spends public dollars. Therein lies the conflict with the Redevelopment
Commission. One yet to be resolved.
Finally, he closed by urging everyone to read the Hojnacki document titled "Paying for Public
Services in St. Joe Co." that he had previously given to the Council.
There being no further business to come before the committee at this time, Chairperson Rouse
adjourned the meeting at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~ ~l
Timothy A. Rouse, C 'person
Community and Eco mic Development Committee