HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-15 Zoning and Annexation ZONING &ANNEXATION NOVEMBER 9,2015 3:45 P.M.
Committee Members Present: Oliver Davis,Valerie Schey(XAB), Henry Davis(XAB),
Derek Dieter(XAB)
Citizen Members Present: Ron Okoye
Other Council Present: Tim Scott, Dr. Fred Ferlic, Dr. David Varner, Karen White,
Gavin Ferlic
Others Present: Brian Pawlowski, Mario Mariani, Matt Chappias,
Greg Hockenan (NNRO), Eric Deniger, Wayne Sams,
Mike Danch
Agenda: Bill No. 47-15 Rezoning—1205 & 1151 Hickory Rd.
Bill No.48-15 Rezoning-1619 &1623 Franklin St.
Bill No.49-15 Rezoning-1714& 1716 S. Michigan St.
Bill No. 64-15 Amending Chapter 21 Repealing& Replacing
Section 21-06.3 Northeast Neighborhood
Zoning Overlay District
Zoning and Annexation Chairman Oliver Davis called the hearing to order though no other Committee
members were present. Nonetheless,five other Councilmembers were present to consider the four bills
scheduled for presentation. Oliver noted no recommendations would be forwarded to full council for
lack of a quorum.
The first bill 47-15 was a petition to rezone two parcels at 1151 and 1205 Hickory Road from "0"office
to SF1 single family. Matt Chappias made the presentation saying the staff of the Area Plan Commission
(APC) and the Commission itself gave the petition a favorable recommendation. The petitioner Eric
Deniger explained residential zoning was necessary for the bank mortgage loan sought by the buyer.
There being no questions from Council Oliver Davis moved onto bill 48-15. This bill requested a rezoning
from SF2 single family to Ll light industrial. Matt Chappias reported that both the staff and Commission
forwarded this request favorably. Wayne Sams,the petitioner, said the two properties at 1619 and
1623 S. Franklin required the L1 zoning so that the adjacent business could expand by building a
warehouse. One parcel was vacant. The other had a home ready for demolition. With a little discussion
to clarify location and surroundings, Oliver was ready to move to the next agenda item.
Bill 49-15 was a petition to rezone 1714 and 1716 S. Michigan Street. The requested change from MU
mixed use to LB local business would allow for a small liquor store. After Matt Chappias explained the
zoning criteria he said both the APC staff and Commission forward the request favorably. Mike Danch
representing the petitioner further explained the request. He provided a site plan identifying the
parcels,the parking and screening. He added Councilperson Valerie Schey representing this area
supported the request as did surrounding property owners. During Council questioning several
Councilmembers seemed reluctant to OK a liquor store. Tim Scott in particular had reservations and
asked Mike Danch to have the petitioner appear at the evening public hearing.
1
The final agenda item was a request initiated by the Area Plan Commission (APC)to repeal one overlay
zoning district and replace it with another corrected overlay termed the NNZO (Northeast Neighborhood
Zoning Overlay)district. Matt Chappias from the APC staff again made the presentation. He said this
was in effect, a clean-up bill, eliminatiny of an overlap area to distinguish it from the River East
Development Area. This change he explained would expedite potential development in the area. Both
Mar •\Maria ' " •m the South Bend Heritage Foundation and Greg Hockenan Notre Dame and NNRO
spoke ' fa •r of he change. After brief discussion,Oliver adjourned at 4:08 P.M.
1) Sub itted,
Oh' - D.1 'airperson
Zonin: _. 4 nexation Committee
2
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
f z, 11 in 1 .11'-`.7.-.1.1 1ItIIII_: A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, ) s
1 — tr { I I 1 I i I CITY OF SOUTH BEND, PORTAGE TOWNSHIP, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA. SITET•
Tlf1$ as`ypf[�I 0\pp1 .' I r J , a� _ @ .....�-c•
1 i; I II 4. : I I I I
r
�,._�1Nr:-.711"1.117.3111:::.I J I! _ LbIIE LOCATION MaP
_ g 11 i L p�dH II w
J jlkq I _Y .. 1
T ) 1 1 ; , °t iz � 1 � I I I tl 1I A Ci S S = 4
tY r3 1 '
I
sel I 1 I I I : � I I J I - `� RAWWNE RMWNE
. .I 5 . 1 I 1, 140 PUBLIC Y'
.L..- �}- -, f _ C ALLEY
� Nj ^ 1 r 11 ," N gP00'00'E 185.00't AS
f
f a l' 1.. I • 1 1 1 WG� ��i rabwmed Data Site"A"
� I IrhrIJ"-L d.I 1 1 1
�. . L U.ACrceB<ofsdc. 036 acre
AERIAL VIEW ASPHLO PKNWE B /SPI4.IT PARSONS I Proposed land coverage nauamfroMa<Yeofahe
a. 3.3n 21.19
j A
LOT t a-v" b.Parkng and Drives 8,463 53.99
YJIL t Mn' �'� 5 /JMRER.
O !` M'B• c.Opayspas 3.890 2182
�r: Total 15,6)5 100.00
y 2).Proposed loud use and floor area.
A.....
��� ®O ,• OO" Um Floor V.of Total floor area 9yg.Height
'•, 47 a Retail In FI 3,322 sf 72.63 (story 290
J FGA( DFSCRIPBON 99 —• vV' a '• 3�mm b.ORU 2nd Fl 1.252 of 6.93 3amry 28 R.
O „G.W LT, O tSGO �DON Y'b O Told 4.514 sf 10000
A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 2 O I 'TDSO <e' �H..A.
EAST, PORTAGE TOWNSHIP, Si'. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS: LOTS 0 i� �� /� 1 . a 2a).Proposed number and type of units,atimated populanogdcmtry NIA
OF 1 AND 2 OF THE PLAT OF 'CORALS' 1ST ADDITION' AS RECORDED IN THE RECORDS g A5PW1 PAWING �IIF B
OF THE ST. JOSEPH COUNTY. INDIANA RECORDER'S OFFICE. 3 Ie _ y - 'A 3).Padungratio requued by Ordinance:
CONTAINING 0.3BACRES MORE OR LESS. W D• eRCx�j O / w.e Q.DfEUwe 35sWCesper 1,000 sgfl of grass office ROOrama,
W &IhDMG/ tSTY� \ '�Y s:'y/� Number of regularssgw prov Eed2sgfl ofo(fu0wrarta 4spow ill
SUBJECT TO ALL LEGAL HIGHWAYS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. E-4 1�, /A, iA _% 2__ ,90...0: \v. H _'I
era et.'1-..' 3 O•I If J x,t., ° b).Retail use:3.5spaces per 1,000 Sq.R of gross retail floor area;
I Nmbar of spaces required for 3,322 sq.R.&ren0 Row area. 12 spas.
• Muar sp13 pacesserviceswimry sewesmd mtlwciWl wotwAssocDrive vw46 to be hired by Ne Sout Bend Egineering p p .. Department
Lt o .oRoft NNE eV UNE LFL4•TP gsshall untom to the SOUOI Bendsmvdvds.
9).Landscaping per zoning Ordinance standards.
H 10).Signage:per zoning Ordinance standnds.
6-EOEND S.
O30.0'FRONT-YARD BUILDING SETBACK "'
Q 10.0' SIDE-YARD BUILDING SETBACK DAYTON STREET (60.0' R/19) g R<aNUTcd vadaR<e
O20.0' SIDE-YARD RESIDENTIAL BUFFERYPRD A).From the required building foundation landscaping to no additional landscaping along
020.0' REAR-YARD RESIDENTIAL BUfFERTA O S - - Wc(ronmflhcbuilNng as shown on the site plan.
8
Rff NNE I R/N'UNE R/W LONE i c/
s Sp.W 50.00' s d s o\
C in Ytl7
OENDML SURVEY AN.WMER NOTES: 0 20' 40' 60' i? !I•
I—LJ LI I I ° ili
ME )T VIRMOl SHOWN TO AN DRAWING Is INTENDED TIE FOR THE SURVEYOR ONLY.M MY REUSE m( E
WITHOUT w END D RILL E A IRE IIS'EIS SOLE RITE AND WITHOUT Wpum OR IE4LL Al?A E
wawa TO THE um SURVEYOR.
Mw MET OR EASEMENT LOCATORS,IF SHOWN.ARE IPPROAMATE THE CLIENT MUST E1Em N 8
REFRY AMER LOCATORS WRH ME RESPECTIVE UTIIM COMPANY. LAS LAND SURVEYOR
�II
ASSUMES NO LU&UIY FOR THE ACCUMCY OF THE LOCATION OR SIZE Of COMA MUTE • vE,1
OR THE SWINGE OR eONEOSRME Of.NCRSNL UNDERGROUND MATTES W STRUCTURES. 9
•
NO WPHrhEMEMS SORD BE MADE ON THE BMW Or THIS PLAT ALONE PEED 9
0ONUMFMATON Of CRITICAL PARS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO COMMLNCEMEM OF
ANY MO ILL CONSTRUCTOR. FOR BOROMO LINES.0050EM5 AND CRIER RESIPWTTNS NOT
SHIM HEREON REFER TO YOUR DEEM ABSTRACT.MU PODGY CONTRACTS AND LOCAL
WILDING.ZONING AND'SUMMON ORDINANCES. •
THIS SUENEY DOES NOT PURPORT U PRESENCE SHOWN WETM'LS' HAZARDOUS OR DEGRONYfMNLTY INJURIOUS
MM9311PMALS. ME SURVEYOR°PRLSSLT DLSCLNVS ANY RESPONSIBILRY OR WBINY FOR DIE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
NB WAN10H FIT, W0 NOTNRLOW TD BE SMME rEe(pFL2
f5 TONY ftWMI. dt SE ORFAS W IXIORM 11S BAN MINI B(:
d B PAST w FOR WV USE a Na W ur PROEM. OW MU5E MOH DARN a RYEEEES h P101xmx.
9/2/14 SMM REVISIONS
NWIAIM NO ail BI:FIT M005% AIXRCI M RMM FM TE
MOIIC PROSE MPoPD ML TIE NFM 9E RI9:M9 NR[N tN81M ` Dwa,HV01ER k 155Q.TES.INC.
W LWA.00550E 10 TE MCKEE M<RECT OR ARMOR. 643 00104FFCE ORE SOLE CHECKED BY: '2, BY
..• Saml mrD,RC 46528 1'=20' MJD 4 r.
EWMMC ARCED w 2N-403C RN I Ffl01 WJGR:C O pt MORE CONSTRUCTION w O ES ATM M IADn
RANCH
150210 SMM
ewenPr , n '