Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-03 S&P Rating Report: Redevelopment Authority Lease Rental Revenue Bonds of 2015 Due 02/01/2037
'STANDARD & POOR "S RATINGS SERVICES WGRAW HILL FINANCIAL RatingsDirect @ Summary: South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Indiana South Bend; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security Primary Credit Analyst: John Sauter, Chicago (1) 312 - 233 -7027; john.sauter @standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Anna Uboytseva, Chicago (1) 312 - 233 -7067; anna .uboytseva @standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 1 13887381 301153519 Summary: South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Indiana South Bend; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security US$25.0 mil Ise rental rev bnds (South Bend) ser 2015 due 02/01/2037 Long Term Rating Rationale AA /Stable New Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'AA' long -term rating to South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Ind.'s series 2015 lease rental revenue bonds, issued on behalf of South Bend, and reflecting an ad valorem property tax pledge. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AA' rating on existing ad valorem property tax - supported debt issued by and on behalf of the city. The outlook on all the ratings is stable. A lease between the authority (as lessor) and the South Bend Redevelopment Commission (as lessee) secures the bonds. Lease rentals are payable from ad valorem property taxes on all taxable property in the South Bend Redevelopment District, which is coterminous with the city. The pledge of ad valorem property taxes is subject to the state's circuit - breaker legislation, yet all debt service levies are levied to their full extent, with any circuit - breaker losses first distributed across the city's nondebt service levies. The lease is also payable from certain tax - increment revenues. The city intends to forgo the tax levy and pay debt service with these tax - increment revenues. However, funds equal to the next calendar year's debt service payments are required to be on hand and deposited into a debt fund before the city can make a decision to not levy the tax, which alleviates potential timing and liquidity risk. The rating is based on the ad valorem tax pledge, which we consider stronger than the tax - increment pledge. The lease is paid by the commission directly to the trustee. Neither rental payments nor the ad valorem tax pledge is subject to appropriation. There is abatement risk, but pursuant to the lease, the commission is required to substitute the leased premise for a different leased premise of equal or greater value if the original leased premise is considered unfit for usage. Management intends to use bond proceeds to continue the financing of road and street improvements, and to cash fund a debt service reserve fund. Bond proceeds will also fund capitalized interest through the February 2017 interest payment. The 'AA' rating reflects our assessment of the following strengthening factors for the city, including its: • Very strong budgetary flexibility with available reserves in excess of 75% of general operating expenditures; • Adequate budgetary performance, with mostly balanced operations and some minor planned deficits; • Very strong liquidity providing very strong cash levels to cover both debt service and expenditures; and WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 2 13887381 301153519 Summary: South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Indiana South Bend; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security • Strong management, supported by good planning practices. Limiting credit factors include the city's: • Weak economy, with below- average incomes and market value per capita, but stability from the presence of several universities, including the University of Notre Dame; and • Weak debt and contingent liabilities position. Very strong budget flexibility In our opinion, South Bend's budgetary flexibility remains very strong, with combined general and nongeneral available funds' reserves exceeding 75% of general operating expenditures for the past few years and no plans to significantly spend them down. Our analysis consider the city's public safety local option income tax fund and county option income tax fund as part of the general fund, given the services rendered in these funds are highly comparable to what we consider basic general fund operations. Additionally, we factor the city's rainy day, county economic development income tax, and loss recovery funds as nongeneral available funds, given the lack of restrictions on their use. Combined, for audited fiscal 2013, the total available reserves (on an accrual basis of accounting) in these funds were $68.5 million, or 85% of expenditures. On a cash basis, the city reports a slight increase in total available reserves for unaudited fiscal year -end 2014, to be offset by a use of reserves being budgeted for fiscal 2015. The city and county passed an income tax in 2009, which increased budget flexibility and helped the city avoid spending cuts. Though additional revenue - raising flexibility is now limited, in our view, the city has the capacity to reduce expenditures. Adequate budgetary performance South Bend's budgetary performance is adequate, with mixed results across the general and total governmental funds, but mostly balanced overall operations. For audited fiscal 2013, the city reported a deficit of 4.2% for the combined general fund and a surplus of 3% for total governmental funds, after adjusting for one -time legal settlement receipts, spending of bond proceeds, and recurring payments in lieu of taxes from enterprise funds. We understand the combined general fund deficit is the result of some staff increases. Unaudited cash results for fiscal 2014 indicate less than a 1% deficit for the combined general fund, and a small surplus for total governmental funds. Deficits are expected across the general fund and total governmental funds for fiscal 2015, though we understand they are mostly due to planned spending, particularly given the depth of reserves. Property taxes, collected semiannually, are the largest single revenue source, typically accounting for just under 50% of total governmental fund revenues. Very strong liquidity Supporting the city's finances is liquidity we consider very strong, with total government available cash equal to 35% of adjusted total governmental fund expenditures and 274% of debt service expenditures. We believe South Bend has exceptional access to external liquidity. It has issued bonds frequently during the past 15 years, including bonds backed by ad valorem property, hotel and motel, and income taxes, plus water and sewer revenue bonds. South Bend does not have direct bank loans with provisions that we consider permissive in terms of a potential draw on cash on hand. Strong management conditions We view the city's management conditions as strong, with good financial practices that lead to steady operations. Officials review several years of historical data when forming the budget, and much of its revenues are certified in WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 3 13887381 301153519 Summary: South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Indiana South Bend; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security advance by the Department of Local Government Finance. The council sees monthly reports that contain budget -to- actuals and investment holdings. Long -term financial forecasting is now part of the budget process, and is annually updating a long -term capital improvement plan. The city has debt and investment policies, and has adopted reserve policies for all its funds, including a minimum 25% of expenditures policy for the general fund. Weak economy We consider South Bend's economy weak, with projected per capita effective buying income of 66% of the U.S. and total market value (gross assessed value less tax - exempt property) of $4.4 billion, or $43,836 per capita. South Bend is home to several colleges and universities, most notably the University of Notre Dame, which employs about 5,920 and has a student body of about 12,000. This presence is a stabilizing factor for the economy, and suppresses, to an extent, both incomes and market value per capita. Traditionally, county unemployment has tracked higher than that of the state and the nation, and averaged 8.8% in 2013. Weak debt and contingent liability profile In our opinion, the city's debt and contingent liability profile is weak, with total governmental funds debt service at 12.9% of total governmental fund - adjusted expenditures and with net direct debt at 91% of total governmental fund - adjusted revenue. Potential future debt issues in 2015 include about $11 million in income and hotel /motel tax - secured obligations to finance park improvements and energy efficiencies. We do not expect these possible future obligations to affect our assessment of the debt and contingent liability profile, however. South Bend makes annual contributions to the state - managed Indiana Public Employee Retirement Fund and 1977 Police Officers' and Firefighters' Pension and Disability Fund. The city's contributions to these funds in 2013 were equal to state requirements and amounted to $6.6 million, or 4.6% of adjusted total governmental funds' expenditures. The city sponsors a retiree health care plan, and pays 70% of police and fire member premiums. Civilian employees can buy into the plan, but must cover 100% of premiums. The city uses a pay -as- you -go approach to retiree health care, with costs totaling $702,000 in 2013. Combined, these costs were 5% of total governmental funds spending. Management does not anticipate significant increases in annual pension and retiree health care costs in the near future. Strong institutional framework We consider the Institutional Framework score for Indiana municipalities strong. Outlook The stable outlook reflects our view of South Bend's consistently very strong available reserve position, enhancing its budgetary flexibility. We anticipate that budgetary performance will remain adequate or better, supported by strong management, thus ensuring maintenance of very strong budgetary flexibility. If the city were to significantly spend down its available reserves, whether for operating purposes or many large -scale projects, we could potentially lower the rating. Though unlikely within the two -year outlook horizon, stronger incomes, combined with employment diversification and expansion, could lead to a higher rating. WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 4 13887381 301153519 Summary: South Bend Redevelopment Authority, Indiana South Bend; General Obligation; General Obligation Equivalent Security Related Criteria And Research Related Criteria • USPF Criteria: Local Government GO Ratings Methodology And Assumptions, Sept. 12, 2013 • USPF Criteria: Financial Management Assessment, June 27, 2006 Related Research • S &P Public Finance Local GO Criteria: How We Adjust Data For Analytic Consistency, Sept. 12, 2013 • Institutional Framework Overview: Indiana Local Governments South Bend Bldg Corp, Indiana South Bend, Indiana South Bend Bldg Corp (South Bend) GO Long Term Rating AA /Stable Affirmed South Bend Redev Auth, Indiana South Bend, Indiana South Bend Redev Auth (South Bend) Ise rental rev rfdg bnds (Morris Performing Arts Proj) ser 2008 due 08/01/2008- 02/01/2017 Long Term Rating AA /Stable Affirmed South Bend Redev Auth (South Bend) GO Long Term Rating AA /Stable Affirmed South Bend Redev Dist, Indiana South Bend, Indiana South Bend Redev Dist (South Bend) spl taxing dist rfdg bnds (South Bend) ser 2014 due 01/01/2022 Long Term Rating AA /Stable Affirmed Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 5 13887381 301153519 Copyright © 2015 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit - related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S &P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S &P and any third -party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S &P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S &P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S &P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S &P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit - related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S &P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S &P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and /or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S &P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S &P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S &P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S &P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S &P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S &P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S &P may have information that is not available to other S &P business units. S &P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic infonnation received in connection with each analytical process. S &P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S &P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S &P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S &P publications and third -party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www. standardandpoors .com /usratingsfees. WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MARCH 12, 2015 6 13887381 301153519