HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning - Lots 61 through 68 of Kaley's First Subdivision and Lots 89 through 95 of Kaley's Second SubdivisionORDINANCE No. 4077
Passed by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
February 27 rgg6
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of South Bend,
February 28 146
Clerk
of Common Council
Approved and signed by me February 28 ig6
-49107
Clerk
ORDINkNCE NO. 4077
AN ORDI1TANCE TO AT.I ND ORDINANCE 110. 3702,
COItZ,ONLY KNUMN AS TIE ZONING ORDIRANICE
Section 1. BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of
the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, Indiana, that the
following described real estate in the city of South Bend,
to -wit:
Lots 61 through 68 of Kaley's First Subdivision
and Lots 89 through 95 of Kaley's Second
Subdivision
be rezoned from "C" (commercial) to "B" use district and "B"
height and area district.
Section 2. This Act shall be in full force and effect
after its passage by the Common Council and approved by the I, lay or,
and legal publication.
110m er of e Common ounce
Iet & 2nd READING
GD;R6ITTEE OF THE WWW
PUBLIC HEARING ✓�
8M RE40WG
NOT WMVEp
ran eZ J.
�D /i I
ROY A. WORDEN
PRESIDENT
J. FRANK MILES
V I CE.PRESI DENT
WALTER GLASS
GALEN B. SARGENT
RAYMOND S. ANDRYSIAK
DR. L. A. RAUSCH
DONALD L. ADAIR
FLOYD WERNTZ. JR.
F. R. HENREKIN
ROBERT L. HUFF
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CITY OF SOUTH BEND
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
February 7, 1956
Honorable Common Council
City of South Bend
South Bend, Indiana
Gentlemen:
The attached petition of John Stith, et al, to zone
from Light - industrial Use District to "BR Residential
Use District and "B" Height and Area District Lots
numbered 61 through 68 of Kaley's First Subdivision
and Lots numbered 89 through 95 of Kaleyts Second
Subdivision, being all lots facing Kenwood Avenue
between Meade and Fremont Streets, was legally adver-
tised under date of January 23, 1956. The public
hearing was held under date of February, 2, 1956, at
which date the Commission, in executive session, con-
sidered the petition and remonstrances thereto and
took the following action:
The Commission found that property was zoned commer-
cially and used residentially, that there would be no
non - conforming uses created by a change to "B" Residen-
tial Use, that property owners wished the protection of
residential zoning, that property would increase in
value and reflect favorably on surrounding property
values, and that the public welfare would be best served
by the favorable recommendation of the petition.
It was, therefore, moved, seconded, and carried that the
petition be recommended favorably.
Very truly yours,
CITY P ING COMMISSION
bent Huff
Director- Secretary
RIH : aed