HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.05.25 BZA Agenda Packet
1 | Page
City of South Bend
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
AGENDA
Monday, May 5, 2025 - 4:00 p.m.
County-City Building
Fourth-Floor Council Chambers
www.tinyurl.com/sbbza-2025
PUBLIC HEARING:
1.Location: 207 E CALVERT ST BZA#0326-25
Owner: Mohamed Nafti
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1)From the maximum encroachment of a frontage type into a front yard of 5' to 14'
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
2.Location: 1333 WILBER ST BZA#0327-25
Owner: PROJECT IMPACT SOUTH BEND INC
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1)From the maximum encroachment of a frontage type into a front yard of 5' to 9'
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
3.Location: 3401 WESTERN AVE BZA#0322-25
Owner: LAKSHMI PRIYA & KAUR RAVNEET & MR DISCOUNT GRILLE & LIQUOR LLC
Requested Action:
Special Exception: beer/wine/liquor sales
Zoning: NC Neighborhood Center
4.Location: 906, 912, 914, 918 DUBAIL AVE and 1703, 1705 DALE AVE,
1711 DALE AVE
BZA#0321-25
Owner: 2010 INVESTMENT GROUP
Requested Action:
Special Exception: a two unit dwelling on each lot in U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
5.Location: 1702 WESTERN AVE BZA#0325-25
Owner: A & M WIRELESS INC
Requested Action:
Special Exception: a Restaurant use
Zoning: UF Urban Neighborhood Flex
City of South Bend BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
2 | Page
ITEMS NOT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING:
1.Findings of Fact - April 7, 2025
2. Minutes – April 7, 2025
3.Other Business
4.Adjournment
NOTICE FOR HEARING AND SIGN IMPAIRED PERSONS
Auxiliary Aid or other services may be available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable
advance request when possible.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0326-25 May 5, 2025
Property Information
Location: 207 E CALVERT ST
Owner: Mohamed Nafti
Project Summary
Removing and rebuilding the front porch for safety and durability, the new porch will match the
design of the previous porch
Requested Action
Variance(s):
1)From the maximum encroachment of a frontage type into a front yard of 5' to 14'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
approve the variance as presented.
Staff Report – BZA#0326-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0326-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0326-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The approval should not be injurious to the general welfare of the community. The front
porch and overhang will match the built form and setbacks of the surrounding neighborhood
and will restore the porch to its original footprint created in 1907.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance should not
be affected in a substantially adverse manner as the porch will match the built form of the
surrounding area and will be a restoration to its original configuration.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the terms in this Chapter could result in difficulties restoring the
porch to its existing layout. Contextual setback language only applies to new buildings and
not existing structures, leading to existing and older buildings to have to request a variance
to replace existing frontages. In this case, the dwelling is about nine feet (9') within the front
setback, making any application of a frontage type require a variance.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance granted is the minimum necessary. The roofed porch will be in the same
location as when originally built, matching the design of the original house. It does not
feature any expansion of the porch as it existed. The porch will be 6’ deep, the minimum
depth for a porch as defined by the zoning ordinance.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
The building was built in 1907 and was built close to the street keeping in line with the
neighborhood layout at the time. This created a non-conforming condition as the zoning was
applied to the area.
Analysis: Built in 1907, prior to any zoning laws, the house and the property to its east were
sited with no setback from the lot line. The porch deteriorated over the years and needs to be
replaced to be a functional frontage. Replacing the porch with one that fills the same footprint
helps maintain the historic built form of the neighborhood and provides an effective frontage for
the property.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board approve the variance as presented.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 5
Staff Report – BZA#0327-25 May 5, 2025
Property Information
Location: 1333 WILBER ST
Owner: PROJECT IMPACT SOUTH BEND INC
Project Summary
Adding a porch to the front of the house
Requested Action
Variance(s):
1)From the maximum encroachment of a frontage type into a front yard of 5' to 9'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
approve the variance as presented.
Staff Report – BZA#0327-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 5
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0327-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 5
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0327-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 5
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0327-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 5 of 5
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The approval should not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare
of the community.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance should not
be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The zoning ordinance generally encourages
frontage types to act as an interface between the public and private sphere. This should
make the area more welcoming and active.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical difficulties in
installing the porch. As the facade of the dwelling is twelve feet (12') from the lot line, it
makes it impossible to construct any frontage type permitted within the zoning district.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance granted is the minimum necessary. The variance is meant to permit the
minimum depth required for a porch frontage type. A variance would be required to build any
frontage type given the building's front setback. This variance will allow for a frontage type
that replaces a stoop with a non-conforming depth.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
The structure has existed without a porch as its frontage type for between 30 and 60 years.
As the structure is sited, it would be impossible to establish a required frontage type without
the need for a variance.
Analysis: In 1960, 10 of the 11 homes on Wilber had full front porches while only one has a full
porch in 2022. The petitioner is seeking a variance to construct a porch that will restore that
former condition to their home and improve the block face. Additionally, the variance should
bring the frontage type for the house into greater compliance from the stoop which is non-
conforming in depth.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board approve the variances as presented.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0322-25 May 5, 2025
Property Information
Location: 3401 WESTERN AVE
Owner: LAKSHMI PRIYA & KAUR RAVNEET & MR DISCOUNT GRILLE & LIQUOR LLC
Project Summary
Applying for a special exception to be able to sell carry out beer, wine, and liquor as the primary
use.
Requested Action
Special Exception: To allow beer/wine/liquor sales
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation, with the condition that
all improvements to bring the building up to zoning compliance are completed within 6 months.
Staff Report – BZA#0322-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0322-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0322-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon
the evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1)The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
The property is currently utilized as a bar along a major commercial corridor and it is not
anticipated that allowing beer/wine/liquor sales at the site would be injurious to the general
welfare of the community.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
The property is utilized as a bar along a major commercial corridor. Allowing carry out
beer/wine/liquor sales should not create additional external impacts to injure or adversely
affect the use of the adjacent area or property values.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
Located along the Western Avenue commercial corridor, the proposed use is consistent with
the form and use of surrounding properties.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The petition is consistent with the City Plan, South Bend Comprehensive Plan (2006),
Objective LU 2.2: Pursue a mix of land uses along major corridors and other locations
identified on the Future Land Use Map.
Analysis: Located along the Western Avenue commercial corridor, the proposed use is
consistent with the form and use of surrounding properties.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable
recommendation, with the condition that all improvements to bring the building up to zoning
compliance are completed within 6 months.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0321-25 May 5, 2025
Property Information
Location: 906, 912, 914 DUBAIL, 918 DUBAIL AVE and 1703, 1705, 1711 DALE AVE
Owner: 2010 INVESTMENT GROUP
Project Summary
New duplex construction on vacant lots at the corner of Dale and Dubail.
Requested Action
Special Exception: to allow a two unit dwelling on each lot in U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation.
Staff Report – BZA#0321-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0321-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon
the evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1)The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
Approval of this Special Exception should not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals, and general welfare of the community. The project will feature newly constructed
duplexes designed to be similar to the built form of the surrounding area. The construction
of two unit dwellings on vacant parcels will provide more residents to the neighborhood
which will increase safety and the general welfare of the community.
(2)The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
New duplex construction should not injure or adversely affect the uses or values of adjacent
properties and the area around the buildings. The project is designed to blend with the built
form of the surrounding area and will bring new residents to the area, providing housing on
lots that are currently vacant.
(3)The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
The duplexes will further complement the existing housing stock, matching the scale and
built form of the neighborhood and providing infill housing on vacant lots. The proposed use
will provide more housing options for residents.
(4)The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The petition is consistent with the City Plan, South Bend Comprehensive Plan (2006)
Objective H1.1: Encourage residential developments to contain a mix of housing types,
densities, price ranges, and amenities.
Analysis: The construction of new duplexes that are consistent with the built form of the
surrounding neighborhood will bring new residents to the area and provide additional housing
on lots that are currently vacant.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable
recommendation.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0325-25 May 5, 2025
Property Information
Location: 1702 WESTERN AVE
Owner: A & M WIRELESS INC
Project Summary
The property consists of two store fronts. One store front is vacant. The owner is in negotiations
with a tenant to fill the vacancy with an ice cream shoppe and restaurant.
Requested Action
Special Exception: to allow a Restaurant use
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation with the condition that
all improvements to bring the building and site up to zoning compliance are completed within 6
months of approval.
Staff Report – BZA#0325-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0325-25 May 5, 2025
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon
the evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1)The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
The proposed use should not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, community
moral standards, convenience or general welfare as any proposed restaurant will meet all
applicable building and fire safety codes.
(2)The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
The proposed use should not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values. The building was designed and has historically been utilized as
retail/service space and the introduction of a restaurant will activate the building and
enhance the neighborhood by offering a new local amenity.
(3)The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
The parcel is located on busy Western Avenue across the street from large retail and
industrial uses. The proposed use as a small scale restaurant is consistent with the
surrounding traditional neighborhood development pattern of UF and U3 and will serve to
enhance the area.
(4)The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The proposed use is consistent with City Plan (2006), Objective LU2.2: Pursue a mix of land
uses along major corridors and other locations identified on the Future Land Use Map.
Analysis: The building was designed and has historically been utilized as retail/service space.
Introducing a restaurant will activate the building and enhance the neighborhood by offering a
new local amenity.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation
with the condition that all improvements to bring the building and site up to zoning compliance are
completed within 6 months of approval.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception