HomeMy WebLinkAboutAmending Chapter 21 Historic Preservation CommissionORDINANCE No. 71o7 -82
Passed by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
11 , 19 82
� / /J/ / /'f� IRENE K. GAMMON
C ' ac �--_'_ n.
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of South Bend,
Approved and signed by me
October 12 �9 82
I
Clerk
of Common Council
IRENE K. GAMMON
Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 716 -O Q
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 21, ARTICLE 6.5, ENTITLED
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT:
In the operation of the Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to
the current code provisions for that operation, certain changes and addi-
tional provisions have become necessary for the effective and efficient oper-
ation of that Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF SOUTH BEND THAT:
SECTION I. Chapter 21 of Article 6.5 of the Municipal Code of the City
of South Bend, Indiana, shall be amended as follows:
A. Section 21- 11T'I(b) shall be amended by the addition thereto
of the following new sub - section (4):
(4) Whenever a Commissioner fails to attend four (4) consecu-
tive, regularly scheduled meetings, the Historic Preservation Com-
mission may determine the position to be vacant and certify to the
appropriate appointing body that the position is vacant and the
appropriate appointing body shall, within thirt—y-C-30T days after re-
ceipt of notice from the Commission, appoint another and different
Commissioner for the remainder of the term.
B. Section 21- 117.2(b) shall be deleted in its entirety.
C. Section 21- 117.2(e) shall be amended to read as follows:
(e) Within ''HP'' historic preservation districts, or as to
Historic Landmarks, the Historic Preservation Commission shall have
the following powers and duties:
(1) The Historic Preservation Commission shall issue a
certificate of appropriateness before any one of the following actions
is taken: the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition
or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure, or use.
This- proeisrert- shat- i- be -in- force- art - the - effective- date -of
Ordinance -Ne 7- 5565 7337 Certificates of appropriateness shall be
issued in accordance with the stipulations of this article.
(2) Nothing in this article shall be construed to prevent
the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building, structure or
use which will not involve a change in any exterior features or to
prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or
moving of any building, structure or use which the Building Commis-
sioner or other official having such power may certify as required
by the public safety because of an unsafe or dangerous condition.
Where the Historic Preservation
essary, the Commission may petition the C
porary delay in the issuance of the requi
construction, reconstruction, alteration,
designated Historic Landmark for the purp
vation plan for said Landmark. Such yeti
period of time. The
tition when it finds
a. That such action wil
subiect orooerty to
Commission
ommon Counc
red permit
demolition
ose of prep
tion shall
deems it nec-
1 for a tem-
for proposed
or moving of a
ring a preser-
e for a specif
ommission's Pe
the owner of the
ship: and
b. That such delay will not be injurious to the public
health, safety or welfare; and
c. That in keeping with the intent of this Article,
such action is necessary and appropriate.
In no case may the delay granted by the Common Council exceed one
1 year, but the Commission may petition the Common Council for a
continuance of any such delay granted by the Common Council in ac-
cordance with the same procedures set forth above for the initial
petition.
(3) An application for a building permit, demolition
permit, sign permit or moving permit shall also be deemed to be an
application for a certificate of appropriateness. Within five (5)
working days of receipt of such application relative to a building,
structure or use in said district, the Building Commissioner shall
forward the application to the Historic Preservation Commission for
review and approval - prior -to- the - issuance -of -a- permit action pursuant
to Section 21- 117.2(e) (5), below.
(4) Where no other permit is required, an application for
a certificate of appropriateness shall be filed with the Historic
Preservation Commission on the form prescribed by the Commission.
Said applicant shall include the following information:
a. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
b. Location of the subject building, structure or use;
C. Structural drawings and specifications, floor plans,
elevations, cross- sectional plans, renderings, dia-
grams or other such plans;
d. Samples of materials to be used, including colors;
e. Where the proposed change includes a sign, a scale
drawing showing the location of the sign on the struc-
ture or property, the type of lettering, and the method
of illumination; and
f. Other such information as the Historic Preservation
Commission may require under the provisions of this
article.
(5) The Historic Preservation Commission shall consider
the application within thirty (30) days following its receipt of the
application for a certificate of appropriateness, and shall either:
a. Issue a certificate of appropriateness stating that
the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration,
demolition, or moving is in conformance with the pro-
visions of this article and antherizing authorize and
direct the Building Commissioner to issue a building
perm t, demolition permit, sign permit or moving
permit if required; or
b. Deny the application, stating in writing the reason(s)
for such denial. Upon such denial, the applicant may
appeal said denial to the Common Council which shall
make a final determination of the application. Fail-
ure of the Historic Preservation Commission to take
such action within forty -five (45) days after receipt
of the application by the Commission shall constitute
approval of the application.
In making such determination, the Historic Preservation
Commission shall consider the following:
Appropriateness of the proposed construction, recon-
struction, alteration, demolition or moving to the
preservation of the historic landmark, specifically
-2-
and /or the Historic Preservation District,
generally;
2. The detriment to the public welfare if the
proposed construction, reconstruction, altera-
tion, demolition or moving is permitted even
though it is not deemed appropriate; and
3• The potential hardship that the denial of a
certificate of appropriateness would cause the
applicant.
(6) Reserved.
(7) The Historic Preservation Commission may petition
the Building Commissioner to use the legal means available to him to
cause the maintenance and /or repair of any historic landmark in accor-
dance with the intent of Ordinance -No -- 5565 -i3 this Article.
(8) Within each of the Historic Preservation Districts
established in accordance with the provisions of this article, the
Historic Preservation Commission shall establish Neighborhood De-
velopment Committees to advise the Historic Preservation Commission
in matters relative to the district which the Committee represents.
D. Section 21- 117.2(f) shall be amended to read as follows:
(f) Establish reasonable and just standards for the preser-
vation of Historic Landmarks and Historic Preservation Districts,
including architectural treatment, site development requirements,
and provisions concerning construction, reconstruction, alteration,
demolition or removal of any building or structure, or parts thereof.
Provided however, that no- standards- shai } -be- adopted- that- are - not -in
keeping -with- the - intent- and- parpase -e €- this - art }e }e; - and- saeh -stan-
dards- sha } } -be- app} ieab }e- on }q- te- exterier- €eatares.
(1) The Historic Preservation Commission may adopt only
those standards necessary to prevent such construc-
tion. reconstruction. alteration. demolition. or
ntent of this article: an
(2) Such standards shall be applicable only to the exterior
features of Historic Landmarks and of buildings or
structures within Historic Preservation Districts.
E. Section 21 -117.2 shall be amended by the deletion in its entirety
of existing sub - section (j) and by the addition thereto of the following
new sub - sections (j) and (k):
(j) Accept through gift, grant, legacy, bequest, or endowment,
monies and preservation easements in real property for the purpose of the
preservation of Historic Landmarks and Historic Preservation Districts.
Expenditures of such money, regardless of the source, must be deposited
in a special Historic Preservation Commission account, and receive prior
approval from the Common Council before expenditures may be made.
(k) The provisions of this Article shall be enforced as pro-
vided by Article 9 of this Chapter.
SECTION ll: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage by the Common Council, approval by the Mayor, and legal publication.
Passed, as amended, October 11, 1982
Member of the Common Council
-3-
Tmm utrr Irport
Wo the (Oommnn Monnrtl of the (Otto of SoW4 Mend:
Your Committee OF THE WHOLE
to whom was referred
BILL NO.
50 -82 A BILL AMENDING SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 21, ARTICLE 6.5, ENTITLED HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION.
Respectfully report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion THIS BILL SHOULD BE RECOMMENDED
TO THE COUNCIL FAVORABLE, as amended:
By substitutio:i of a new bill
reel .eeu + .neu........
JOHN VOORDE
Chairman
"AREA PLAN COMMISSION
OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN
Room 1140 County -City Building
June 16, 1982
The Honorable Common Council
City of South Bend
County -City Bldg. - 4th Floor
South Bend, IN 46601
South Bend, Indiana 46601
RICHARD S. JOHNSON
Executive Director
(219) 284 -9571
RE: An ordinance initiated by Councilman Lewis McGann amending the
Historic Preservation Commission Sections of the Zoning Ordinance
for the City of South Bend
Gentlemen:
The attached petition initiated by Councilman Lewis McGann was legally
advertised June 5, 1982. The Area Plan Commission gave it a public hearing on
June 15, 1982, at which time the following action was taken:
Upon a motion by Dean Speicher, being seconded by Robert Lehman and
unanimously carried, the ordinance initiated by Councilman Lewis
McGann amending the Historic Preservation Commission Sections of the
Zoning Ordinance for the City of South Bend is tabled for one month.
The deliberations of the Area Plan Commission and points considered in arriving
at the above decision are shown in the minutes of the public hearing, and will
be forwarded to you at a later date to be made a part of this report. Attached,
for your consideration in the review of this matter, is a copy of the Area Plan
Commission's Staff Report.
Sincerely,
Richard S. Johnson
Executive Director
RSJ /sr
Attachment
CC: Councilman Lewis McGann
Mr. Kevin Butler
Historic Preservation Commission
Serving: South Bend, Lakeville, New Carlisle, North liberty, Roseland & St. Joseph, County, /N
1:16�ii77[ •: �� �uu •� - •:
This proposed Ordinance amends portions of Article 6.5 of the South Bend Zoning
Ordinance, which pertains to the Historic Preservation Commission. Besides amending
portions of this Article for purposes of clarity, new provisions have been added
which include:
1. Replacing members of the Historic Preservation Commission who
are not attending meetings.
2. Extending the powers and duties of the Historic Preservation
Commission to Historical Landmarks as well as historic
preservation districts.
3. Allowing the Historic Preservation Commission to accept money
for the purposes of historical preservation.
4. Providing a penalty clause for violating the provisions of
this Article, including new penalty fees which are
substantially higher than those relating to the rest of the
Zoning Ordinance.
5. Allowing the Historic Preservation Commission to institute
injunction procedures to require compliance with this Article,
or "to prevent, enjoin, abate or remove any violations under
this Article ", if injunction procedures are not Instituted by
the City Attorney.