HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-25-02 Council Meeting MinutesREGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, met in the Council
Chambers of the County -City Building on Monday, November 25, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. The meeting
was called to order by Council President Roland Kelly and the Invocation and Pledge to the Flag
were given.
ROLL CALL
Present: James Aranowski
Charlotte Pfeifer
Roland Kelly
Karl King
David Varner
Ervin Kuspa
Sean Coleman
Al "Buddy" Kirsits
Karen L. White
Absent: None
l" District
2nd District
3rd District President
41h District Chairperson, Committee of the Whole
51 District
6' District
At -Large
At -Large
At -Large Vice - President
REPORT FROM THE SUB- COMMITTEE ON MINUTES
To the Common Council of the City of South Bend: The sub - committee has inspected the minutes
of the November 11, 2002 meeting of the Council and found them to be correct.
Therefore, we recommend the same be approved.
s/Roland Kelly
s/David Varner
Councilmember Coleman made a motion that the minutes of the November 11, 2002 meeting of the
Council be accepted and placed on file. Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried
by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
SPECIAL BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO. 3135 -02 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
RECOGNIZING AND COMMENDING THE POP
WARNER'S SUN DEVILS AS UNDEFEATED
FOOTBALL CHAMPIONS
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, notes that the Pop
Warner League provides opportunities for over 150 nine and ten year old youths for a safe, family -
oriented way to learn to play football, while emphasizing sportsmanship and scholarship; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council is proud to honor the Pop Warner's Sun Devils who
ended their 2002 football season with an 8 -0 undefeated record; and
WHEREAS, the Sun Devils scored 202 points this season, while limiting their opposition
to a total of 12 points, and defeated the Merrillville Pirates in the regional tournament by a score of
7to6;and
-1-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, would like to
recognize all of the members of the undefeated Sun Devils team, namely:
Donald Agnew
Gehrig Dieter
Noah Niedbalski
Kyle Zappia
Derek Agostino
Nolan Dieter
Jalen Pearson
Derek Dieter, Coach
Adrian Austin
Thurman Dieter
Pablo Pedraza
Les Niedbalski, Coach
Kameron Berry
Ryan Garatoni
Ryan Reidenbach
Ray Vanett, Coach
Cody Clippinger
Shawn Jacks
Hendrik Reydams
Tony Zappia, Coach
Taylor Conner
Tylor Keen
Terrance Snelling
Bill Crothers
Jeffrey Kramer
John Vanett
WHEREAS, the Common Council is further proud to recognize that twelve (12) of the
players on the victorious Sun Devils football team are honor roll students.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, as follows:
Section I. On behalf of all of the residents of the City of South Bend, Indiana, the Common
Council is proud to honor and recognize all of the players and coaches of the Sun Devils football
team for their undefeated 2002 season and for winning the Michiana Youth Football League
Championship.
Section II. The South Bend Common Council hereby recognizes all of the players, coaches,
parents and friends who positively contributed their time and talents to the Pop Warner program in
developing it into a positive, youth activity for other communities to emulate.
Section III. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by
the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s /James Aranowski, First District
s/David Varner, Fifth District
s /Charlotte Pfeifer, Second District
s /Ervin Kuspa, Sixth District
s /Roland Kelly, Third District
s /Sean Coleman, At Large
s /Karl King, Fourth District
s /Al `Buddy" Kirsits, At Large
s/Karen L. White, At Large
s /Kathleen Cekanski - Farrand, Council Attorney
ATTEST:
s /Loretta J. Duda, City Clerk s /Stephen J. Luecke, Mayor
Mr. Sean Coleman, Councilmember At- Large, 4319 Foxfire Drive, South Bend, Indiana, made the
presentation for this Resolution.
Councilmember Coleman read the Resolution in its entirety and presented a copy to all the members
of the team and the coaches who were present.
Head Coach Derek Dieter, 1135 Portage Avenue, South Bend, Indiana, thanked the Council and
Councilmember Coleman for this Resolution. He advised that the Pop Warner League is unique
in that it brings together kids from various schools throughout the community. He stated that they
came together for one cause and they came together as a team.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to this
Resolution, Councilmember Varner made a motion for the unanimous approval of this Resolution.
Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried.
-2-
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Mr. Nolan Dieter, 1135 Portage Avenue, South Bend, Indiana, on behalf of the entire Sun Devil
Team and Michiana Pop Warner Football, thanked the Council for this honor and Councilmember
Coleman for his efforts to make this Resolution possible. Mr. Dieter stated that the team is very
proud to be honored by the City of South Bend and they hope to be back here again next year.
RESOLVE INTO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
At 7:10 p.m. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to resolve into the Committee of the Whole.
Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
Chairman King presiding.
Councilmember King explained that this is the portion of the meeting in which the Council meets
as a Committee of the Whole in order to hear presentations and public comments on bills that have
been submitted for ordinance consideration. After the hearing on each bill, the Committee will vote
on the disposition of the bill which typically is sent to the Council with either a favorable or an
unfavorable recommendation. He noted that the Committee of the Whole operates in accord with
the Council's rules of procedure and Roberts Rules of Orders with Council Attorney Kathleen
Cekanski - Farrand serving as the Parliamentarian. The procedure for the Public Hearing on each bill
consists of several steps as follows:
1. The title of the bill is read by the City Clerk.
2. Reports are presented from the pertinent Council committee and, if pertinent, the
Area Plan Commission.
3. A formal presentation in favor of the bill which is not subject to a time limit is
presented.
4. Comments are heard from any members of the public who wish to speak in favor of
the bill and each such member is limited to five (5) minutes for his/ her presentation
and must begin by stating his /her full name and residential address, not an office or
business address but a residential address.
Any formal presentation against the bill or Resolution which is not subject to a time
limitation is heard.
6. Comments are heard from any members of the public wishing to speak against the
bill and each such member is limited to five (5) minutes for his/ her presentation.
They should begin by stating his/ her full name and residential address. The total
time for comments by members of the public speaking against the bill is limited to
the total amount of time that was used by those speaking in favor or thirty (30)
minutes, whichever is greater.
7. There is a five (5) minute rebuttal period for the persons who gave the formal
presentation in favor of the bill after which the public portion of the hearing is closed.
The Council portion of the hearing is last at which time members will discuss the bill
and vote on its disposition.
This is the procedure for the Committee of the Whole. It is also the same procedure that will be used
later in the Council portion of the meeting when Resolutions are heard and the President is in the
Chair.
Councilmember King noted that there are two (2) items on the agenda this evening which will not
be heard because they will be postponed in response to requests from the petitioners. Bill No. 72 -02
-3-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
will be postponed to the December 9th meeting of the Council and Bill No. 88 -02 will be postponed
until the January 13th meeting. Motions dealing with those postponements will follow.
BILL NO. 72 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
ANNEXING TO AND BRINGING WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AND AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR CERTAIN LAND IN
PORTAGE TOWNSHIP CONTIGUOUS THEREWITH;
RONALD & BEVERLY MATTHYS LLC, AND INDIANA
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 57500 BLOCK OF
MAYFLOWER ROAD SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
Councilmember King noted that the Council has received a request from the petitioner to postpone
this bill until the December 9th meeting of the Council. Therefore, Councilmember Coleman made
a motion to continue this bill until December 9, 2002. Councilmember Aranowski seconded the
motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 70 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
1018 -1020 NORTH SHERMAN STREET, IN THE CITY OF
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
Councilmember White reported that the Zoning & Annexation Committee held a Public Hearing on
this bill and sends it to the Council with a favorable recommendation.
Mr. Jeff Myers, Staff Planner, Area Plan Commission, 1805 Hickory Road, South Bend, Indiana,
presented the report from the Commission.
Mr. Myers advised that the petitioners are requesting a zone change from "A" Residential, "A"
Height and Area to `B" Residential, "A" Height and Area to allow a multi - family dwelling unit. The
property currently contains a four (4) unit multi - family structure. Located to the north, south and
west are single family homes zoned "A" Residential, "A" Height and Area, to the east is vacant land
and single family homes zoned "A" Residential, "A" Height and Area. Access to the site is from
Sherman Avenue and associated alleys north and east of the site. Water and sewer are available to
the site. The drainage has not been addressed by the petitioner. The total site to be rezoned is six
thousand four hundred (6,400) square feet. Of that, the buildings will occupy thirty -four per cent
(34 %) of the site, parking and drives will occupy thirty -four per cent (34 %) of the site and thirty -two
per cent (32 %) of the site will remain as open space. A check of the Agency's maps indicates that
no public wells, flood hazards, wetlands or environmental hazard areas are present. The site plan
is preliminary. The City Engineer will require paving of the parking area as shown on the site plan.
The Area Plan Commission, at its Public Hearing held on October 15, 2002, sent this petition to the
Council with an unfavorable recommendation. Although the intent of this petition is to bring the
existing use of the property into conformance with the zoning code, it would circumvent the intent
of the neighborhood down zoning to "A" Residential which was approved in November of 1976 for
a large portion of the Near Northwest neighborhood. The rezoning was initiated by the Common
Council on behalf of homeowners of the near northwest neighborhood to restrict future development
to single family uses in an effort to upgrade and maintain their neighborhood. Like most area -wide
rezonings, some properties which were rezoned became legal non - conforming uses and were
grandfathered with the intent that eventually the non - conforming use would be phased out. This
particular property was zoned "A" Residential prior to the neighborhood rezoning and remains zoned
"A" Residential today. It is the Commission's opinion that this property should remain zoned "A"
in
U
1
1
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Residential and when the existing multi- family use no longer exists, only those uses allowed in the
"A" Residential zoning district will be allowed on the property. The Commission would also point
out that there are several other duplexes and multi - family structures in the neighborhood which were
downzoned in 1976 and for which rezoning to `B" Residential zoning could be sought if this petition
is successful.
Mr. Greg Stroupe, 10212 Shadow Wood Drive, Granger, Indiana, made the presentation for this
bill.
Mr. Stroupe advised that he owns the property at 1018 -1020 Sherman and has petitioned the City
to change the zoning from single family to multi- family. He noted that he understands the reluctance
to spot zone and the desire to increase home ownership in this neighborhood but asked that the
Council consider the special circumstances of this request. The structure was built in 1920 as a
multi - family house and is three thousand eight hundred (3,800) square feet. He further noted that
it is unrealistic to think that this house will ever exist as a single family residence. Mr. Stroupe
advised that he has owned the property for over three (3) years and has made numerous
improvements. In December of 2001 a decision was made to sell the property. It was sold in
March of 2002 to a financially qualified individual who began to secure financing. For five and one
half months ( 5 1/2) months this person tried to get approval through numerous financial institutions
but even though he was extremely qualified he was turned down by every lender he contacted. Mr.
Stroupe informed the Council that the value of the property is partially derived from its income
earning potential. The lenders have become much more conservative in the past year or so and
because the property is zoned single family they require that they be provided with a letter from the
City stating that if the structure burnt down it could be rebuilt as it exists today. The City will not
provide this letter. Therefore, the only alternative was to rezone the property to multi - family which
would match the current use of the property and its past use for the last eighty -two (82) years. Mr.
Stroupe asked the Council to consider the circumstances of this unique situation as this property has
always been a multi- family home.
In response to questions from Councilmember Coleman, Mr. Stroupe stated that there are two
furnaces in the house and that the property is actually split down the middle in that there are two (2)
water heaters, (2) furnaces and two (2) electric services as well. He confirmed that currently the
house is used as a quad. Additionally, Mr. Stroupe stated that there are two (2) front doors for the
two downstairs apartments and for the upstairs there is a back entrance on the exterior of the
building. Councilmember Coleman noted that the Area Plan Commission report stated that the
building is two thousand one hundred ninety -one (2,191) square feet which will occupy is thirty -
four per cent (34 %) of the site but Mr. Stroupe stated that the structure actually had three thousand
eight hundred (3,800) square feet and he asked Mr. Stroupe why there is a discrepancy. Mr.
Stroupe noted that the base is two thousand one hundred (2,100) square feet but the square footage
that he is considering is for both the upstairs and downstairs.
This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and
opponents were given an opportunity to be heard.
The following individuals spoke in favor of this bill:
Mr. Douglas W. Way, 5237 North Falls Church Court, South Bend, Indiana, advised that he is an
advocate for strong neighborhoods and for single family housing and is wholeheartedly in favor of
the zoning that was put in place in the early 1970's. However, there are a half dozen homes that
were intentionally built as multi - family housing and Mr. Stroupe owns one of those homes. To
expect someone to remove walls that were permanently put there as original construction and to
restore it to a single family home that it never was is ridiculous. He noted that as much as he
believes in strong neighborhoods he also believes injustice. Mr. Stroupe is being put through a
financial hardship by not being able to sell this property as it was built for its intended purpose. If
he cannot sell his house, he is allowed two (2) options. One, he can sell the house on a land contract
-5-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
most probably to someone who cannot get commercial financing. Two, he can sue the City to
overturn the law because the structure was originally built as a multi - family house. Mr. Way asked
the Council to consider doing justice to this unique situation by voting the right way in good
conscience to give Mr. Stroupe the zoning that he deserves as the house was originally built as a
multifamily structure.
Mr. Mike Wojtysiak, CPA, with offices at 112 West Jefferson Boulevard, South Bend, Indiana,
informed the Council that back in 1976 when this ordinance was passed there was an exception of
half a dozen homes that were built for multi - family use and this house falls within that category. He
noted that this structure pays approximately one thousand three hundred ($1,300) to one thousand
four hundred ($1,400) a year in property taxes with those taxes most likely going up twenty per cent
(20 %) or more next Fall. He noted that this house is not the type of structure where walls could be
removed to change it back to a single family home. From an economic standpoint, if a catastrophe
happened at this structure the insurance company cannot allow Mr. Stroupe to build a structure
greater than the value of what the neighborhood will hold which would be around seventy -five
thousand ($75,000.00) for a single family home in that area. As a dwelling available for multi
family use it is allowed to be appraised at a much higher value which does bring up the tax base.
Mr. Wojtysiak stated that the rezoning done in 1976 was not put in place to harm a half dozen
investors within that neighborhood.
There was no one else present wishing to speak in favor of this bill.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to this bill:
Ms. Karen Ainsley, Executive Director, Near Northwest Neighborhood, Inc., 711 Forest Avenue,
South Bend, Indiana, advised the Council that the NNN, Inc. was formed around 1974 and is
dedicated to improving the neighborhood by developing housing, organizing residents and
promoting the neighborhoods interest. On October 8, 2002, the Board passed a Resolution to
oppose the request to convert this property from "A" to `B" residential. The organization has
worked hard since its inception to get the majority of the neighborhood zoned "A" residential and
increase home ownership. The organization feels it necessary to resist any spot zoning and any
zoning exception would go against NNN's long term plans to stabilize and increase single family
home ownership in the neighborhood.
There was no one else present wishing to speak in opposition to this bill.
Mr. Stroupe declined his opportunity for rebuttal.
Councilmember Aranowski advised that for the last six (6) years he has worked with the Near
Northwest Neighborhood Associations who have set some good policies and have made some head
way with single family residences. He noted that their policy is to keep that kind of zoning and since
he has worked with them for so long he is going to support their efforts and will not be in favor of
this bill.
Councilmember Coleman advised that he strongly supports efforts to rezone residential
neighborhoods throughout the City and will continue to do so. However, there are certain exceptions
that need to be made when structures that have a specific intent, as in this particular case, where
a structure was built as multi - family and has maintained that use throughout its history.
Councilmember Coleman stated that if this structure were considered for single family residence,
it would undercut its initial and ongoing purpose. He noted that he believes that this request is an
exception for Council consideration being handled through the process being followed this evening.
It is the Council's decision tonight to determine whether or not this structure merits that exception.
Councilmember Coleman stated that he believes that it does and he supports the passage of this bill.
W
1
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Therefore, Councilmember Coleman made a motion to send this bill favorably to full Council.
Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion.
Councilmember Pfeifer stated that she will not be voting in support of this bill. She noted that for
years the City has made a commitment to stabilize neighborhoods and to make it such that single
family owners can move in and have affordable housing. Not only has the NNN worked very hard
at correcting the zoning in many neighborhoods, other neighborhood associations have as well. She
further stated that she believes that it would be a bad situation to change this zoning. Should the
structure have to be replaced due to a fire, then a single family house would have to be built and that
would continue the work that the NNN and the Lincolnway and Portage Avenue Corridors have
done. In conclusion, Councilmember Pfeifer advised that she will not be supporting the zoning
change.
Councilmember Kirsits commented that he is not for spot zoning and he appreciates the efforts that
the neighborhood association has done. However, if the petitioner intends to recoup his investment
and go to a land contract, that actually could be a far worse fate to the immediate neighborhood.
The fact that this house has had continuous use as a rental property with apartments, it deserves this
rezoning. He noted that there are several houses in his neighborhood in this same situation and they
deserve the right to continue that way as long as they are maintained.
Councilmember Varner noted that it appears that the house can continue to operate in its current
status so long as nothing catastrophic occurs. On the other hand, it was built as a duplex to begin
with and having existed as a duplex, that consideration should be given to the fact that this house
was originally built as a duplex versus a building that has been converted from a single family house.
He further noted that should the Council find itself inundated in the next six (6) months with
requests from other building owners in the neighborhood, the Council can absolutely make a
distinction between that which has been converted and that which has been constructed as a duplex.
Councilmember King noted that there has been a motion and a second to send this bill to the full
Council with a favorable recommendation. Because the voice vote could not be determined,
Councilmember Coleman made a motion for a roll call vote. Councilmember Varner seconded the
motion for a roll call vote which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
The motion passed by a roll call vote of five (5) ayes by Councilmembers Varner, Kuspa, Coleman,
Kirsits and Kelly, with nay votes by Councilmembers Aranowski, Pfeifer, King and White.
BILL NO. 92 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1, SECTION 1 -4 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH BEND COMMONLY
REFERRED TO AS SIX (6) COUNCILMANIC DISTRICTS
Council President Kelly reported that the Council Rules Committee reviewed this bill this afternoon
and sends it to the full Council with a favorable recommendation.
Ms. Charlotte Pfeifer, Second District Councilmember, 1013 West Washington Street, South Bend,
Indiana, made the presentation for this bill.
Councilmember Pfeifer advised that every ten (10) years after the census, governmental units are
required to consider redistricting. She further advised that at the end of 2001, she formed a
committee which had broad depth and breath of representation from neighborhoods,
Councilmembers and resource people. The committee met once a month on a Saturday to study
various plans with the result being the redistricting bill submitted this evening. Four issues kept in
mind were that they wanted to make sure that there was a balance of population among all of the
-7-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
districts, they wanted to be respectful of natural boundaries, they wanted to be respectful of
neighborhood boundaries and take those into consideration and they wanted to make sure that the
representation of Councilmembers was respected. After much work and some community forums
they were able to develop the redistricting plan submitted today. Councilmember Pfeifer noted that
the end result showed two (2) small changes to the second and fifth districts as indicated on the map
submitted with the bill. Councilmember Pfeifer thanked everyone involved with this project for their
hard work.
This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and
opponents were given an opportunity to be heard.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to this
bill, Councilmember Coleman made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council
concerning this bill and congratulated all those who participated in this process. Councilmember
Kelly seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 93 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
APPROPRIATING $83,900.00 FROM THE MORRIS
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER IMPROVEMENT FUND
(FUND NUMBER 416)
Councilmember Coleman reported that the Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and Entertainment
Committee met this afternoon to consider this bill and sends it to the Council with a favorable
recommendation.
Mr. Dennis J. Andres, Executive Director, Morris Performing Arts Center, 211 North Michigan
Street, South Bend, Indiana, residing at 1812 East Madison Street, South Bend, Indiana, made the
presentation for this bill.
Mr. Andres requested approval of this bill which appropriates monies from Fund #416 to cover
expenses for seven (7) capital items and projects. These items are needed to support the efforts of
the Morris Performing Arts Center and will directly improve the facility's operations and its value.
Mr. Andres asked for the following:
$38,500.00 To cover the expense of constructing an area at the rear of the facility with
electrical service to properly enclose and operate two (2) six (6) yard
compactor units.
$17,000.00 To improve electronic security in the facility. Additional cameras and door
sensors plus other improvements will be added to the facility.
$16,700.00 To complete the awning /canopy work that was started over a year ago. This
work will be completed before the grand opening of the Palais Royale this
New Year's Eve.
$6,000.00 For telephone system upgrades and computer cards for the system to upgrade
the function and to help improve customer service.
$2,500.00 For locksmith services to unify the keying system in the Morris with the new
one in the Palais to give them added security and control of the Morris
Complex.
In
k
1
1
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
$2,350.00 For the cost to repair the gold leaf which is tarnishing in the grand lobby
ceiling of the Morris. The ceiling area must be resealed to stop the tarnishing
process and to protect the investment.
$850.00 To cover the cost of the pallet truck to assist in the delivery of supplies on
the Morris loading dock.
Mr. Andres noted that the total request from Fund #416 is eighty three - thousand nine - hundred
dollars ($83,900.00).
In response to a question from Councilmember King, Mr. Andres advised that all of these funds
come from the surcharge. There is a one dollar ($1.00) surcharge on all tickets sold in the theater
and that one dollar ($1.00) is sequestered in Fund #416 for capital improvements or capital items
within the Morris Performing Arts Center. He agreed that it is fair to say that this money comes
from users of the theater.
This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and
opponents were given an opportunity to be heard.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to this
bill, Councilmember Coleman made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council
concerning this bill. Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of
nine (9) ayes.
- BILL NO. 94 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
ESTABLISHING A NEW CAPITAL FUND TO BE
KNOWN AS THE SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT SAMPLE /EWING ALLOCATION AREA
CAPITAL FUND ( #427)
Councilmember King reported that the Community and Economic Development Committee held
a Public Hearing on this bill and voted to send it to the Council with a favorable recommendation.
Mr. Don Inks, Director, Division of Economic Development, residing at 2030 Hollywood Place,
South Bend, Indiana, made the presentation for this bill.
Mr. Inks advised that this bill will create anew fund to be known as the South Bend Redevelopment
District Sample /Ewing Allocation Area Capital Fund #427 which is related to the TJX development
project and the bonds that were issued to finance that project. The capital fund will receive the bond
proceeds which will then be disbursed for the TJX development costs.
This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and
opponents were given an opportunity to be heard.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to this
bill, Councilmember Coleman made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council
concerning this bill. Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of
nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 88 -02 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 17 -21
91
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
OF THE SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH NEW SEWER RATES BOTH INSIDE AND
OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS
Councilmember King noted that the Council has had a request from the Petitioner that the Public
Hearing for this bill be postponed until the January 13, 2003 meeting of the Council.
Councilmember Kirsits noted that several committee hearings have been held on this bill and the
Petitioner indicated today that they are still negotiating with some of the users of the City's utility
sewer service in hopes that they can come to an agreement. He further noted that the Petitioner will
submit a substitute bill to the Council on January 13th. Councilmember Kirsits indicated that the
Utilities Committee will hold a Public Hearing prior to the Council meeting on January 13th and will
also conduct a meeting and Public Hearing a week before the Council meeting. Therefore,
Councilmember Kirsits made a motion that this bill be postponed until the January 13, 2003 meeting
of the Council. Councilmember Coleman seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine
(9) ayes.
RISE AND REPORT
Councilmember Coleman made motion to rise and report to the full Council. Councilmember
Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
A ATTEST:
Lorett . D a, Ci erk , Chaio
%tittee of the
REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED
Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend reconvened in the Council
Chambers on the fourth floor of the County -City Building at 7:45 p.m. Council President Roland
Kelly presided with nine (9) members present.
BILLS - THIRD READING
ORDINANCE NO. 9374 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, ANNEXING TO AND
BRINGING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA, CERTAIN LAND IN GERMAN
TOWNSHIP CONTIGUOUS THEREWITH; SALAH &
CYNTHIA HILAL, 52447 PORTAGE ROAD, SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to pass this bill. Councilmember
Coleman seconded the motion which carried. The bill passed by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 9375 -02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1018 -1020
NORTH SHERMAN STREET, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA
-10-
1
1
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to pass this bill.
Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a roll call vote of five (5) ayes by
Councilmembers Varner, Kuspa, Coleman, Kirsits and Kelly with nay votes from Councilmembers
King, White, Aranowski, Pfeifer.
ORDINANCE NO. 9376 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 1, SECTION 1 -4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
OF SOUTH BEND COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS SIX
(6) COUNCILMANIC DISTRICTS
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to pass this bill.
Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried. The bill passed by a roll call vote of
nine (9) ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 9377 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, APPROPRIATING
$83,900.00 FROM THE MORRIS PERFORMING ARTS
CENTER IMPROVEMENT FUND (FUND NUMBER 416)
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Pfeifer made a motion to pass this bill. Councilmember
Coleman seconded the motion which carried. The bill passed by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 9378 -02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, ESTABLISHING A
NEW CAPITAL FUND TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTH
BEND REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SAMPLE /EW1NG
ALLOCATION AREA CAPITAL FUND ( #427)
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to pass this bill. Councilmember
Coleman seconded the motion which carried. The bill passed by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
RESOLUTIONS
BILL NO. 02 -83 A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ADOPTION OF A
DECLARATORY RESOLUTION DESIGNATING
CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE VILLAS AT
LAKE BLACKTHORN, 105 LOTS LOCATED ON
APPROXIMATELY 56 ACRES NORTH OF BRICK
ROAD, AND WEST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE U.S. 31
BYPASS, RESIDENTIALLY DISTRESSED AREAS FOR
PURPOSES OF A FIVE (5) YEAR RESIDENTIAL REAL
PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR THE SOUTH BEND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR THE BENEFIT
OF: COOREMAN REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
Due to the absence of the Petitioner for this Resolution, Councilmember Coleman made a motion
to continue this bill until the December 9, 2002 meeting of the Council. Councilmember King
seconded the motion which carried.
-11-
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 3136 -02 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
DESIGNATING THE SOUTH SIDE DEVELOPMENT
AREA AS BLIGHTED AND APPROVING THE ORDER
OF THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH
COUNTY, INDIANA THAT THE SOUTH SIDE
DEVELOPMENT AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CONFORMS TO THE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT FOR
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND AND ADOPTING THE
SOUTH SIDE DEVELOPMENT AREA DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ind. Code § 36- 7 -14 -1, et seq. ( "Act "), the South Bend
Redevelopment Commission ( "Commission ") has conducted investigations, studies and surveys and
has thoroughly studied the area described herein and on November 1, 2002, the Commission adopted
Resolution No. 1914 designating the area described as follows to be known as the "South Side
Development Area" ( "Area ") :
A parcel land being a part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, and a part of Southeast
Quarter of Section 23 and a part of the West half of Section 24, all in Township 37 North,
Range 2 East, City of South Bend, Centre Township and Portage Township, St. Joseph
County, Indiana and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the South right -of -way line of Chippewa Avenue
and the West right -of -way line of the now abandon Penn Central Railroad located
in the Northeast Quarter of said Section 26; thence Northeasterly and Northerly
along said West right -of -way line to the Southerly right -of -way line of Ewing
Avenue; thence East along said South right -of -way line to the first North -South
property line located East of Michigan Street; thence South along said first North -
South property line to the North right -of -way line of Altgeld Street; thence East
along said Altgeld Street, a distance of 5 feet to the West right -of -way line of the
first alley East of Michigan Street projected North; thence South along said West
right -of -way line and its projection to the South right -of -way line of Donmoyer
Avenue; thence East along said South right -of -way line to the West right -of -way
line of St. Joseph Street; thence South along said West right -of -way line to the
North right -of -way line of Farneman Street; thence West along said North right -of-
way line to the intersection with the West right -of -way line of the first alley located
East of Michigan Street projected North; thence South along said West right -of-
way line and its projection North to the North right -of -way line of Jennings
Avenue; thence East along said North right -of -way line to the intersection with the
West right -of -way line of the first alley located East of Michigan Street projected
North; thence South along said West right -of -way line and its projection to the
South right -of -way line of Chippewa Avenue; thence South along said West right -
of -way line to the North right -of -way line of Barbie Street; thence East along said
North right -of -way line to the West line of Lot 56 Zook's First Subdivision
projected North; thence South along said West line of Lot 56 and its projection to
the Southwest corner of said Lot 56; thence East along the South line of said
Zook's First Subdivision to the East right -of -way line of Fellows Street; thence
North along said east right -of -way line to the North line of Lot 75 in said Zook's
First Subdivision; thence East along said North line to the East line of said Zook's
First Subdivision; thence North and Northeasterly along said East line to the North
line of the Erskine Golf Course parcel; thence East along the North line of said
Erskine Golf Course to the West right -of -way line of Miami Street; thence South
along said West right -of -way line to the South right -of -way line of Alpine Drive
projected West; thence East along said South right -of -way line and its projection
-12-
1
1
�J
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
to the East line of Lot A Broadmoor Section 3 Revised; thence Southeasterly to the
Northeast corner of Lot 254; thence East and Northeasterly to the Northeast corner
of Lot 247; thence Southeasterly to the Southwest corner of Lot 246 and being on
the North right -of -way line of Ireland Road; thence East along said North right -of-
way line thence East along the North right -of -way line of Ireland Road to the East
line of Broadmoor Section 6; thence North along said East line to the South line
of Lot 472 in said Broadmoor Section 6; thence East along said South line of Lot
472 and the South lines of Lots 10 and 9 in Ireland Woods, Section One; thence
Northeasterly along the South lines of Lots 8, 7, A, B, and Lot 4; thence East
along the South line of Lots 3, 2, 1 and Lot 71AA to the East line of said Lot
71AA; thence North along said East line of Lot 71AA, and Outlot B, 69, and Lot
68; thence West along the North line of said Lot 68, a distance of 181 feet; thence
North 20 feet; thence West 35 feet; thence North along the East line of Lots 67,
52, and 51 to the South line of Meadow View Second Addition; thence East along
said South line to the West line of a 1.187 acre parcel of land; thence Southeasterly
along said West line to the North line of a 2.577 acre parcel of land; thence West
along said North line to the West line of said 2.577 acre parcel; thence South along
said West line to the South line of said 2.577 acre parcel; thence East along said
South line to the West right -of -way line of Ironwood Road; thence South along said
West right -of -way line to the North line of Ruby Plaza Minor Subdivision
projected West; thence East along said North line and its projection to the East line
of said Ruby Plaza Subdivision; thence South along said East line to the South
right -of -way line of Ireland Road; thence West along said South right -of -way line
to the East right -of -way line of Ironwood Road; thence South along said East right -
of -way line to the North right -of -way line of the U.S. 20 Bypass; thence West
along said North right -of -way line to the East line of Scottsdale Addition, Section
C; thence North along said East line and the East line of Scottsdale Addition,
Section B to the South right -of -way line of Ireland Road; thence West along said
South right -of -way line to the West line of the Scottsdale Addition Section A;
thence South along said West line and its projection South to the South right -of-
way line of the U.S. 20 Bypass; thence West along said South right -of -way line to
the West line of Scottsdale Addition Section D, a distance of 507.7 feet; thence
West to the Southerly right -of -way line of the U.S. 20 Bypass; thence
Southwesterly along said Southerly right -of -way line to the East right -of -way line
of Miami Street; thence South along said East right -of -way line to the South right -
of -way line of Jackson Road; thence West to the West right -of -way line of Miami
Street; thence North along said West right -of -way line to the South right -of -way
line of said U.S. 20 Bypass; thence West along said South right -of -way line to the
West right -of -way line of Fellows Street projected South; thence Westerly,
Southwesterly, and Southerly to the South right -of -way line of Jackson Road;
thence West to the Westerly right -of -way line of said U. S. 20 Bypass; thence
Northerly, Northwesterly, and Westerly along said South right -of -way line of the
U. S. 20 Bypass to the Easterly right -of -way line of the now abandon Penn Central
Railroad located in the South half of said Section 26; thence Northeasterly along
said Easterly right -of -way line to the Southerly right -of -way line of Ireland Road;
thence West along said South right -of -way line to the West right -of -way line of
said abandon Penn Central Railroad; thence Northeasterly along said West right -of-
way line to the place of beginning.
WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that the Area is contiguous and compact; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has caused to be prepared maps and plats of the Area which
show the boundaries of the Area, the location of various parcels of property, streets, alleys, and
other features affecting the acquisition, clearance, replatting, replanning, rezoning, or redevelopment
of the Area, indicating the parcels of property to be excluded from acquisition and the parts of the
-13-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Area to be devoted to public ways, levees, sewerage, parks, playgrounds and other public purposes;
and
WHEREAS, upon such surveys, investigations, and studies being made, the Commission has
found and determined in its Resolution No. 1914, that the Area is blighted to the extent that such
blighted conditions cannot be corrected by regulatory processes or by the ordinary operations of
private enterprise without resort to the provisions of the Act and that the public health and welfare
would be benefitted by acquisition in and redevelopment of the Area under the provisions of the Act;
and
WHEREAS, the Commission has in its Resolution No. 1914 adopted the South Side
Development Area Development Plan ( "Development Plan ") to serve as the plan for the
redevelopment of the Area; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council has received from the Commission certain proposed
findings of fact as set forth in the Commission's Resolution No. 1914 which concern the location,
physical condition of structures, land use, environmental influences and other economic conditions
of the Area; and
WHEREAS, in its Resolution No. 1914, the Commission also approved conditions under
which relocation payments will be made within the Area and established an Allocation Area for
purposes of tax incremental financing; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act, the Commission has submitted its Resolution No.
1914 together with the Development Plan and supporting data to the Area Plan Commission of St.
Joseph County, Indiana ( "Plan Commission ") for approval; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission by its Resolution No. 142 -02, adopted on November 19,
2002, approved, ratified and confirmed Commission Resolution No. 1914 and the Development Plan
and further, the Plan Commission determined that Resolution No. 1914 and the Development Plan
conform to the Master Plan of Development for the City of South Bend; and
WHEREAS, the South Bend Common Council, as governing body of the City, is required
by the Act to approve the order of the Plan Commission and is further required to adopt the
Development Plan before the Commission may proceed with acquisition in the Area or otherwise
implement the Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed by Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended and is further, cognizant of the views of the
residents, taxpayers and merchants in the Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the South Bend Common Council, as follows:
Section 1. The order of the Area Plan Commission of St. Joseph County, Indiana as
expressed in its Resolution No. 142 -02 dated November 19, 2002 that is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit "A ", is in all respects, approved.
Section 2. The Common Council hereby finds and determines that, based upon the
evidence presented consisting of maps and plats of the Area and the proposed findings of fact
submitted to it, that the Area, which has been found by the Commission to be blighted, is blighted
to an extent that cannot be corrected by regulatory processes or by the ordinary operation of private
enterprise without resort to the provisions of the Act and that the public health and welfare will be
benefitted by the acquisition and redevelopment of the Area.
Section 3. The Common Council hereby finds and determines that the objectives of the
Development Plan cannot be achieved without extensive rehabilitation of the Area consistent with
-14-
1
1
I
REGULAR MEETING
the Development Plan.
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Section 4. The Common Council hereby finds that the Area is contiguous and compact.
Section 5. The Common Council hereby recognizes the need for considering the views
of the residents, taxpayers, and merchants in the Area in the redevelopment of the Area.
Section 6. The Common Council hereby assures the United States of America full
compliance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
Section 7. The Common Council hereby finds and determines that South Bend
Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 1914 dated November 1, 2002 and the Development
Plan are in all respects approved and adopted.
Section 8. The Common Council hereby finds and determines that the Area Plan
Commission of St. Joseph County, Indiana Resolution No. 142 -02 dated November 19, 2002 is in
all respects approved.
Section 9. The Common Council hereby directs the City Clerk to file certified copies
hereof together with the minutes of this meeting.
Section 10. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by
the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s /Roland Kelly
Member, South Bend Common Council
Councilmember King reported that the Community and Economic Development Committee held
a Public Hearing on this Resolution and voted to send it to the full Council with a favorable
recommendation.
Mayor Stephen Luecke, 810 Leland Avenue, South Bend, Indiana, and Mr. Bill Schalliol,
Department of Community and Economic Development, 215 Hackberry Drive, Mishawaka, Indiana,
made the presentation for this Resolution.
Mayor Luecke noted that the City is excited about the opportunity for further development on the
south side that would involve some strong retail development hopefully on Ireland Road as well
as further development of the Main and Michigan Street South Gateway to this community. He
noted that they have worked very hard over the last number of years with the commercial corridor
program to strengthen this area and it is believed that this is an appropriate next step with the
declaration of a redevelopment area to provide the City with some tools that they can work with
developers bringing private investment to the area. Mayor Luecke explained that the blighting
designation is not meant to offend anyone but actually follows state law terminology. Mayor
Luecke stated that Mr. Schalliol will detail the specifics that are used to determine blight but he
would like to point out that there are some properties that have environmental issues that would
need remediation as well as some vacancy rates in various properties within the designated areas
that would qualify under the blighting designation. Mayor Luecke noted that they are enthusiastic
about the opportunity that is coming to the area not only in the Ireland Corridor which they
believe will be a strong commercial corridor but also South Michigan and South Main Street up
to Ewing Avenue. They also believe that the private investment in this area will be good not
only for the south side but for all of South Bend and this region.
Mr. Schalliol informed the Council that this Resolution approves the order of the Area Plan
Commission which approved a Resolution at its meeting on November 19th. It also approves the
order of the Area Plan Commission of St. Joseph County which approved the South Bend
-15-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
Redevelopment Commission Resolution dated November 1, 2002. Additionally, it declares the
area to be blighted pursuant to state law. He noted that there are eight characteristics in state laws
that have to be proven to declare an area blighted. They include lack of development, cessation
of growth, deterioration of improvements, character of occupancy, obsolescence, substandard
buildings and other factors that impair value or prevent the normal use or development of the
property. It is believed that many of those characteristics exist in the overall area. He noted that
this is not related to a specific parcel but the general characteristics of the area in total. Mr.
Schalliol advised that this bill also relates to a development plan for the area and a basic
generalized set of goals and objectives for the development and redevelopment of the area. The
bill also approves the conditions under which relocation payments will be made and establishes
an allocation area for purposes of tax incremental financing.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
The following individuals spoke in favor of this Resolution:
Mr. Jim Frick, President, South Gateway Association, 61500 Ironwood, South Bend, Indiana,
advised that the association is in favor of this redevelopment plan which they believe is going to be
the final step to the stimulus that will get the Scottsdale Mall sold as well as other development
projects that will be happening on Ireland Road. They believe tax incremental financing and sales
tax incremental financing will be the stimulus that they have been waiting for the last five (5) years
and hopefully new anchor stores will be named shortly.
There was no one else present wishing to speak in favor of this Resolution and there was no one
present wishing to speak in opposition to this bill.
Councilmember Varner stated that this action is a step in the right direction. The use of
redevelopment areas and TIF districts has been part and parcel to the development and
redevelopment of downtown South Bend for a long time. He believes that people have come to the
conclusion that the new developments are going to go to either where the infrastructure already
exists in the form of the currently existing four (4) lane road such as Grape Road or cities are going
to have to make an effort to provide that sort of infrastructure on a new, updated and upgraded basis
if they hope to keep the ones they have. He stated that he believes this action may well be a very
important piece of the puzzle which gets something done with Scottsdale Mall as well as some of
the other developments that have been proposed.
Therefore, Councilmember Varner made a motion to adopt this Resolution. Councilmember Kuspa
seconded the motion.
Councilmember Kelly pointed out that Mr. Jim Frick was the motivating force that got the South
Gateway Association really moving forward and getting so many good things done in the southern
portion of the City. Councilmember Kelly congratulated Mr. Frick and stated that he believes that
things are looking much better at this point.
The motion passed by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILLS - FIRST READING
BILL NO. 95 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 8, SECTION 2 -117
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH BEND
COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS LEAVE OF ABSENCE
FOR MILITARY TOUR OF DUTY
-16-
1
1
1
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2002
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Aranowski made a motion to refer this bill to the
Personnel and Finance Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December
9, 2002. Councilmember Pfeifer seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
BILL NO. 96 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 8, SECTION 2 -121
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
BEND, ENTITLED CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Pfeifer made a motion to refer this bill to the
Personnel and Finance Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December
9, 2002. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
BILL NO. 97 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
AMENDING FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES CHAPTER
FOUR, ARTICLE FOUR, SECTION 18.5 OF THE
SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING
ADULT BUSINESSES
- . This bill had first reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to refer this bill to the Health
and Public Safety and Personnel and Finance Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third
Reading on December 9, 2002. Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a
voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 98 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND
TRANSFERRING MONIES FROM VARIOUS
ACCOUNTS TO VARIOUS ACCOUNTS WITHIN
DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE VARIOUS FUNDS OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR THE
YEAR 2002
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to refer this bill to the
Personnel and Finance Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December
9, 2002. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
BILL NO. 99 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND
INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS AND DECREASING
APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE VARIOUS FUNDS OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR THE
YEAR 2002
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer this bill to the
Personnel and Finance Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December
-17-
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
9, 2002. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
BILL NO. 100 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
TO REDEEM THE 1992 SOUTH BEND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TAXABLE
LEASE /RENTAL, REVENUE BONDS (PALAIS
ROYALE); TO APPROPRIATE $34,314.63 FROM FUND
#328 FOR BOND REDEMPTION PURPOSES; TO
TRANSFER $260,686.37 FROM FUND #328 TO FUND
#420 (SOUTH BEND CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT AREA
T.I.F.); AND TO CLOSE FUND #328 DUE TO
FULFILLMENT OF THE FUND'S PURPOSE
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to refer this bill to the
Community and Economic Development Committee and the Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts and
Entertainment Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December 9, 2002.
Councilmember Coleman seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
REPORTS FROM AREA PLAN COMMISSION:
It is noted that the Council is in receipt of recommendations from the Area Plan Commission
of St. Joseph County, for the following ordinances based on their Public Hearing held on
November 19, 2002:
BILL NO. 73 -02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 630 EAST COLFAX, SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA
BILL NO. 78 -02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 306 S. NOTRE DAME AND 910 E.
WAYNE /916 E. WAYNE, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA
Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer these bills to the Zoning and Annexation
Committee and set them for Public Hearing and Third Reading on December 9, 2002.
Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
NEW BUSINESS
COMMENDATION TO REVEREND EDDIE MILLER
Councilmember Pfeifer thanked and gave public recognition to Reverend Eddie Miller of the
Faith Apostolic Church for the purchase of LaSalle Square. She noted that Reverend Miller
will be moving his church services to the abandoned Kroger building and will allow the rest
of LaSalle Square to be open to retail business thereby also stimulating economic growth on
the west side of town. She commended and thanked Reverend Miller and all the people that
help him. She noted that he is already an excellent neighborhood residing on Lincolnway
West and she has no doubt that he will continue to be an excellent neighbor in LaSalle
Square.
M.
1
1
1
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
HAPPY 81ST BIRTHDAY TO COUNCILMEMBER VARNER'S MOTHER
Councilmember Varner advised that today is his mother's 81 st birthday. He made a motion
to wish her a very Happy Birthday. Councilmember Kelly seconded the motion which
carried unanimously.
PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
COMMENTS BY MR. JIM CIERZNIAK REGARDING COLLEGE FOOTBALL HALL
OF FAME
Mr. Jim Cierzniak, 1156 East Victoria, South Bend, Indiana, submitted to the Council a
handout which outlined the Operating Revenue and Expenses from January 1st through
September 30th for the College Football Hall of Fame. He reviewed the figures and noted
the comparison between the time the City was running the Hall versus the National Football
Foundation which shows that the NFF has not been able to perform any magic in making
the financial reports any better. Mr. Cierzniak noted that this has to be one of the most
dismal ventures that the City has undertaken. He outlined the figures of what the Hall was
expected to generate versus its losses and noted that it is tax money that makes up the losses.
Mr. Cierzniak informed the Council that he believes that something needs to be done and
needs to be done quickly about the Hall of Fame.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, President Kelly adjourned the meeting
at 8:10 p.m.
ATTEST:
Loretta . Duda, jy Cler
-19-
ATTEST:
Roland Kelly, President