HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-22-04 Council Meeting Minutes REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana met in the
Council Chambers of the County-City Building on Monday, March 22, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. The
meeting was called to order by Council President Karen L. White and the Invocation and Pledge
to the Flag were given.
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Present: Derek Dieter 1st District
Charlotte Pfeifer 2nd District
Roland Kelly 3rd District Vice-President
Ann Puzzello 4th District
David Varner 5th District
Ervin Kuspa 6th District
Sean Coleman At-Large Chairperson, Committee of the Whole
Al "Buddy"Kirsits At-Large
Karen L. White At-Large President
Absent: None
OTHERS PRESENT:
Charles Leone City Attorney
John Voorde City Clerk
Mary Beth Wisniewski Chief Deputy City Clerk
Janice I. Talboom Deputy City Clerk
Absent: Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney
REPORT FROM THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON MINUTES
To the Common Council of the City of South Bend: The sub-committee has inspected the
minutes of the March 8, 2004 meetings of the Council and found them to be correct. Therefore,
we recommend the same be approved.
Members of the Sub-Committee on Minutes
s/Karen L. White
s/David Varner
Councilmember Coleman made a motion that the minutes of the March 8, 2004, meeting of the
Council be accepted and placed on file. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which
carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
SPECIAL BUSINESS
ANNOUNCEMENT OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE SOUTH BEND PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS (TRANSPO)
President White announced the appointments of Ms. Regina Molnar and Mr. Oliver J. Davis to
the South Bend Public Transportation Corporation Board of Directors.
RESOLUTION NO. 3310-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
COMMENDING FIRE CHIEF LUTHER TAYLOR FOR
HIS 32 YEARS OF DISTINGUISHED SERVICE ON
THE SOUTH BEND FIRE DEPARTMENT
-1-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
WHEREAS, the South Bend Common Council proudly acknowledges that approximately
32 years ago Luther Taylor began a remarkable career of public service on the South Bend Fire
Department and quickly became known for his caring attitude and leadership qualities; and
WHEREAS, for the past eighteen (18) years, Luther Taylor has been the Fire Chief,
serving with distinction and earning respect throughout the state for many innovative programs;
and
WHEREAS, some of the many awards bestowed upon Fire Chief Luther Taylor include
being designated "Chief Fire Officer"by the Commission on Chief Fire Officer Designation in
2003 in recognition of demonstrating the highest level of professional, educational, technical and
community service while surpassing the standards of performance required for such a
designation; and
WHEREAS, that under Fire Chief Luther Taylor's leadership the South Bend Fire
Department's 248 sworn firefighters provide a variety of services which include fire suppression,
emergency medical services,public education, prevention services and special operations
consisting of a Water Rescue Team, Hazmat Team, Tactical Rescue and Indiana Rescue Team
who utilize 6,000 fire hydrants and operate under an annual budget of approximately$17 million
in protecting our community of 107,789 while living in the city's twelve fire stations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. On behalf of all of the residents of the City of South Bend, Indiana, the
Common Council is especially proud to acknowledge Fire Chief Luther Taylor for his close to
32 years of distinguished service on the South Bend Fire Department.
Section II. The Council wishes Fire Chief Luther Taylor much success during his
sabbatical leave from the South Bend Fire Department so that he may serve the citizens of the
State of Indiana as the Executive Director of the State Emergency Management Agency; and
hopes that he and his wife, Gwen, will be back in South Bend on many occasions including the
grand opening of the new Central Fire Station and Headquarters Building later this year.
Section III. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption
by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Derek D. Dieter, 1st District s/Ervin Kuspa, 6th District
s/Charlotte D. Pfeifer, 2nd District s/Sean Coleman, At Large
s/Roland Kelly, 3rd District s/A1 "Buddy"Kirsits, At Large
s/Ann Puzzello, 4th District s/Karen L. White, Council President
s/Dr. David Varner, 5th District s/Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney
ATTEST:
John Voorde, City Clerk Mayor Stephen J. Luecke
Councilmember Al "Buddy" Kirsits made the presentation for this Resolution by reading it in its
entirety and presenting it to Chief Luther Taylor.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
Mayor Stephen J. Luecke spoke in favor of this Resolution. Mayor Luecke congratulated Chief
Taylor on his appointment as the Executive Director of the State Emergency Management
Agency.
-2-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Mayor Luecke thanked Chief Taylor for his dedication and wished him and his wife much
continued happiness.
Councilmember Kirsits spoke in favor of this Resolution. He indicated that Chief Taylor
established the 1st Haz-Mat Team in the State of Indiana, approximately 25 years ago, which was
setting a precedent that was followed by various Fire Departments. He stated that Chief Taylor
was instrumental in the creation of the EMS Department. He wished Luther and his wife Gwen
much success and noted that they will be truly missed.
Howard Buchanon, II, Asst. Chief/Inspection &Prevention, 1346 N. O'Brien St., South Bend,
Indiana, spoke in favor of the Resolution. He congratulated Chief Taylor on his appointment to
SEMA. He thanked Chief Taylor for his dedication and commitment to the Fire Department. He
wished Chief Taylor continued success.
Councilmember Varner wished Chief Taylor the very best on his continued success with the
State Emergency Management Agency.
Councilmember Kelly offered his congratulations to Chief Taylor on his appointment to SEMA
and hopes to see him around Fire Station#9.
Councilmember Pfeifer noted that behind every good man there is a good woman. She wanted to
acknowledge Chief Taylor's wife Gwen and wish them both continued good fortune.
Councilmember Dieter wished Chief Taylor good luck.
Councilmember White wanted to accolade all the comments made and congratulate Chief Taylor
and his wife Gwen.
Fire Chief Luther Taylor thanked the Council and Mayor Luecke for the honor of this Resolution.
He also thanked his wife Gwen, who has been his support throughout his career. Chief Taylor
recognized the South Bend Firefighters Association Local#362 and thanked them for their
continued support and cooperation. Chief Taylor indicated that he plans to come back to South
Bend to visit often.
RESOLVE INTO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
At 7:38 p.m. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to resolve into the Committee of the
Whole. Councilmember Kelly seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes. Councilmember Coleman, Chairperson, Committee of the Whole, presiding.
Councilmember Coleman, noted that this is the portion of the meeting in which members of the
council meet as the Committee of the Whole in order to hear presentations and public comment
on bills that are presented for ordinance consideration. Each bill that will be heard tonight will
have a Public Hearing and after the hearing on each bill the committee will vote on the
disposition of the bill which typically is sent to the full Council with either a favorable or an
unfavorable recommendation. He noted that the South Bend Municipal code requires that the
Chairperson describes the procedure for the hearings. The Committee operates in accord with
the Council Rules and Procedures and Roberts Rules of Order and City Attorney Charles Leone
is filling in for Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand who serves as the Parliamentarian.
The procedure for the Public Hearing for each bill is conducted as follows:
1. The title of the bill is read by the City Clerk.
2. Reports are presented from the pertinent Common Council Committee and/or the Area
Plan Commission.
-3-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
3. A folnial presentation in favor of the bill which is not subject to a time limit is heard.
4. Comments are head from members of the public who wish to speak in favor of the bill.
Each such member is limited to five (5)minutes for his/her presentation and must begin
by stating his/her name and residential address.
5. Any formal presentation against the bill or Resolution which is not subject to a time
limitation is
6. Comments are heard from any members of the public wishing to speak against the bill.
Each member of the public speaking against the bill is limited to five (5) minutes for
his/her presentation and must also begin by stating his/her name and residential address.
With respect to those individuals speaking against, the total time for comments by
members of the public speaking against the bill is the amount of time that was used by
those speaking in favor of the bill or thirty(30) minutes whichever is greater.
7. A five(5)minute rebuttal period is allowed for the persons who gave the formal
presentation in favor of the bill after which the public portion of the hearing is closed.
8. Finally, the Council portion of the hearing takes place in which members will discuss the
bill and vote on its disposition
PUBLIC HEARINGS
BILL NO. 10-04 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
ANNEXING TO AND BRINGING WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, CERTAIN
LAND IN CENTRE TOWNSHIP CONTIGUOUS
THEREWITH; DUANE O. AND VIRGINIA M.
ZEIGER, 20000 - 21000 BLOCK, SOUTH SIDE OF
KERN ROAD
Councilmember Kuspa made a motion to accept the substitute version of this bill.
Councilmember White seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
Additionally, Councilmember Kuspa noted that Mr. Larry Magliozzi, Assistant Director,
Division of Community Development, requested that the Second Reading for this bill be
continued to the April 12, 2004 meeting, and that Third Reading be scheduled for April 26, 2004.
Councilmember Kuspa made a motion to set this bill for Second Reading on April 12, 2004 and
Third Reading on April 26, 2004. Councilmember Puzzello seconded the motion which carried
by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 15-04 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS "MULTI-
FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(THE POINTE AT ST. JOSEPH APARTMENTS
PROJECT), SERIES 2004," IN ONE OR MORE SERIES
IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED FOURTEEN MILLION AND 00/100
DOLLARS (14,000,000) AND APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTIONS IN RESPECT
THERETO
Councilmember Kelly made a motion to hear the substitute version of this bill. Councilmember
Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
-4-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Councilmember Kelly, Chairperson, Community and Economic Development Committee,
reported that this committee met on this bill this afternoon and voted to send it to the full Council
with a favorable recommendation.
Mr. Ken Fedder, Attorney at Law, 53600 N. Ironwood, South Bend, Indiana, made the
presentation for this bill.
Mr. Fedder advised the Council that the only substantive change from the originally filed
ordinance is that this bill provides the bondholder the option to extend the term of the bonds for
two additional years at an interest rate to be determined by a formula as set forth in the Trust
Indenture. Mr. Fedder further noted that the principal amount of the bonds will not exceed $14
million and the initial interest rate may not exceed 9%. Mr. Fedder stated that the City will bear
no responsibility, financial or otherwise, with respect to the payment of the principal of and
interest on the bonds or any other expenses associated with the bond issuance. Additionally, the
South Bend Economic Development Commission has approved the refunding at their March 19,
2004 meeting.
This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and
opponents were given an opportunity to be heard.
Mr. Dave Smith, Congress Avenue, South Bend, Indiana spoke in opposition to the bill. Mr.
Smith stated that the Council should not allow tax abatements for apartment complexes. Mr.
Smith noted that his rental properties do not receive any kind of tax credits.
There was no one else present wishing to speak in opposition to this bill.
In rebuttal, Mr. Fedder reiterated that the City will bear no responsibility, financial or otherwise
with respect to the payment of the principal of interest on the bonds or any other expenses
associated with the bond issuance.
Councilmember Kelly made a motion for favorable recommendation to full Council concerning
this bill as substituted. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice
vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 16-04 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
AMENDING SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 4-19,
INCREASING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN
ARBORIST LICENSE.
Councilmember White made a motion to continue this bill until the April 12, 2004 meeting of
the Council. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight
(8) ayes.
RISE AND REPORT
Councilmember Kelly made a motion to rise and report to the full Council. Councilmember
Puzzello seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
-5-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
ATTEST: ATTEST:
etkk, .01111 A
hn orde, City Clerk Sean Coleman, Chairperson
Committee of the Whole
REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED
Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend reconvened in the
Council Chambers on the fourth floor of the County-City Building at 7:31 p.m. Council
President Karen L. White presided with nine (9) members present.
BILLS - THIRD READING
ORDINANCE NO. 9494-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS "MULTI-
FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(THE POINTE AT ST. JOSEPH APARTMENTS
PROJECTS), SERIES 2004," IN ONE OR MORE
SERIES IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED FOURTEEN MILLION AND 00/100
DOLLARS ($14,000,000) AND APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTIONS IN RESPECT
THERETO
This bill had third reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to entertain the substitute
version of this bill as was heard in the Committee of the Whole. Councilmember Kelly seconded
the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes. Additionally, Councilmember Pfeifer
made a motion for the passage of substitute Bill No. 15-04. Councilmember Kelly seconded the
motion which carried. The bill passed by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 3311-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, APPROVING
A PETITION OF THE SOUTH BEND BOARD OF
ZONING APPEALS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1020/1022 S. WEBSTER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
WHEREAS, Indiana Code Section 36-7-4-918.6, requires the Common Council to give
notice pursuant to Indiana Code Section 5-14-1.5-5, of its intention to consider Petitions from the
Board of Zoning Appeals for approval or disapproval; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council must take action within thirty(30) days after the
Board of Zoning Appeals makes its recommendation to the Council; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council is required to make a determination in writing on such
requests pursuant to Indiana Code Section 36-7-4-918.4; and
WHEREAS, the South Bend Board of Zoning Appeals has made a recommendation,
• pursuant to applicable state law.
-6-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, as follows:
SECTION I. The Common Council has provided notice of the hearing on the Petition
from the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to Indiana Code Section 5-14-1.5-5, requesting that a
special exception be granted for the property located at 1020/1022 S. Webster, Tax
ID#18-8021-084105; in the City of South Bend, County of St. Joseph, State of IN; Parcel
Description 250 ft. N & S on Webster x 297 ft. E & W beg. 325 ft. S of SE Cor. Sample &
Webster NW 1/2 14 37 2E, in order to permit a special exception to allow the placement of
occupied storage containers overnight, subject to the conditions set forth in SECTION IV, which
follow, on property zoned "E" Heavy Industrial and "F" Height and Area.
SECTION II. Following a presentation by the Petitioner, and after proper public
hearing, the Common Council hereby approves the Petition of the South Bend Board of Zoning
Appeals, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION III. The Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, hereby finds
that:
1. The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general
welfare of the community;
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the special
exception will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner;
3. The need for the special exception arises from specific conditions peculiar to the
property involved;
4. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance will constitute an
unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which this special exception is sought; and
5. The approval does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan
adopted by the City of South Bend.
SECTION IV. Approval is subject to the Petitioner complying with the following
conditions:
1. All containers stored overnight shall be securely covered to prevent loss or
spillage of contents.
2. All containers, with contents stored on site overnight, shall be removed within 24
hours with exception of weekends when removal shall occur within 48 hours.
3. No transfer of contents shall be made.
4. Petitioner shall provide a written statement from the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) confirming storage as described herein is not
subject to or violative of IDEM's regulations by April 26, 2004.
SECTION V. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
adoption by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Karen L. White
-7-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Councilmember Kelly made a motion to consider the second substitute version of this bill, with
conditions as outlined in the presentation. Councilmember Pfeifer seconded the motion which
carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
Councilmember Kuspa reported that the Zoning and Annexation Committee held a public
hearing on the second substitute version of this bill, with conditions and sends it to the Council
with a favorable recommendation. Charles Leone, City Attorney read into the record the
conditions and changes made to Bill No. 04-29. Mr. Leone stated that Section IV of the
Resolution was changed entirely and reads "Approval is subject to the Petitioner complying with
the following conditions:
1. All containers stored overnight shall be securely covered to prevent loss or
spillage of contents.
2. All containers, with contents stored on site overnight, shall be removed within 24
hours with exception of weekends when removal shall occur within 48 hours.
3. No transfer of contents shall be made.
4. Petitioner shall prove a written statement from the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) confirming storage as described herein is not
subject to or violative of IDEM's regulations by April 26, 2004.
Mr. Brent Bajdek, Assistant Zoning Administrator, Building Department, 125 S. Lafayette St.
Suite 100, South Bend, Indiana, presented the report from the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Mr. Bajdek stated that the Board of Zoning Appeals sends this request for Special Exception to
the City of South Bend Common Council with no recommendation.
Mr. Tom Walz, Attorney at Law, 509 W. Washington Street, South Bend, Indiana made the
presentation for this bill.
Mr. Walz advised that he is representing Junoll Industries, Ltd. He stated that Junoll is an
Indiana Corporation owned by a husband and wife team of June Sheaks and Bernard Voll. Junoll
is a small business that has been operating for six (6) years at 1020/1022 S. Webster. Junoll
leases trash containers that are downloaded off a truck and then picked up after they are filled by
their customers. Junoll seeks a special exception to allow placement of these storage containers
that have contents overnight with the expressed condition that the container would be removed to
the landfill within twenty-four (24) hours for a weeknight and on weekends within forty-eight
(48) hours. Junoll also agrees wholeheartedly that the containers stored overnight will be
securely covered so that it eliminates any concerns about blowing waste or trash. Mr. Walz
stated that the refuse that Junoll hauls is really not subject to blowing around. Junoll has also
agreed that no contents will be transferred in any respect and as a result his clients feel that any
reference to a transfer station is irrelevant. Mr. Walz informed the Council that Junoll will
obtain a written statement from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
confirming that the storage as described is not subject or violate of IDEM's regulations. Mr.
Walz made reference to a letter dated March 5, 2004 from Deputy City Attorney Ann-Carol
Nash. He indicated that Ms. Nash states that based upon her conversations with Catherine
Brucker, Director, Department of Code Enforcement and Don Fozo, St. Joseph County, Building
Commissioner, and based on representations received from the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management, that it does not appear that the operations of Junoll will fall within
the definition of a transfer station and it will not require a license under Section 4-51 of the South
Bend Municipal Code. Mr. Walz stated that Junoll will agree to obtain a separate letter from
IDEM, but he wanted the Council to be aware of this letter and because he did not bring it to the
Council's attention in the informal meetings this afternoon. In support of the request for a
special exception, Mr. Walz would like the Council to consider the reasons for the request.
Junoll is currently occupying the property, it is a very blighted area off Sample Street.
-8-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Junoll has made substantial improvements in cleaning the lot of tremendous overgrowth. Junoll
has also renovated two buildings on the property and removed trash from the site. Junoll
believes that what they are doing is a great asset in a very heavy industrial area. Junoll is seeking
this special exception because of the kind of business that they are in and working with the area
landfills. The landfills are restricting their hours of business. The Indiana landfill hours used to
be from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The new hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and what this
does is shorten Junoll's business day. Mr. Walz noted that one purpose for the special exception
is to allow Junoll to pick up these containers later in the evening and when Junoll cannot make it
to the landfill, they will be able to download the containers on their lot, which will be away from
any residential areas, will not be visually noticed in any respect, and immediately the next
morning they will be taken to the landfill. Mr. Walz noted that his client Junoll Industries feels
that the approval of this request for a special exception will not in anyway be injurious to the
public health, safety or general welfare of our City. Mr. Walz informed the Council that Junoll
believes that they are making a constructive and positive statement by buying this property.
Junoll has completely fenced the entire property with 8' chain link fence with barbed-wire across •
the top. The property will be secured every evening, no one will be able to gain access to these
trash containers or will trash be blowing out of the area. Mr. Walz further noted that Junoll has
established their strong desire to make this property a very businesslike operation. Mr. Walz
stated that Junoll does not haul what we refer to as perishable garbage. Junoll hauls demolition
waste and waste from clean up projects such as cleaning out a garage. The adjacent properties to
the Junoll property will not be affected in any negative way. Mr. Walz thanked the Council,
City Attorney's Office, Building Department and Code Enforcement Department for their
substantial amount of effort and hard work in investigating this matter. Mr. Walz asked the
Council for their favorable approval of this resolution.
President White asked that a copy of the letter from the Deputy City Attorney Ann-Carol Nash
become a part of the public record.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
John Lloyd, 52805 Spring Mill Ct., Granger, Indiana, business address 53732 Generations Dr.
South Bend, Indiana, Attorney, speaking on behalf of Ritchard Brothers, 1204 W. Sample Street,
South Bend, Indiana. Ritchard Brothers is located directly in front of the Junoll property. Mr.
Lloyd noted that there concern regarding this special exception is that this property owned by
Junoll is still consider a transfer station. Mr. Lloyd noted that he believes that the Council has
addressed those issues in the conditions that are now a part of the Resolution. Mr. Lloyd would
like the Council to take those conditions seriously in light of the response from the Indiana
Department of Management. Mr. Lloyd stated that he would like to see more conditions added
to this special exception and that would be that only C and D material be allowed in these storage
containers and that only six storage containers be allowed on the property.
Mike Morris, 1420 S. Walnut Street, South Bend, Indiana. Mr. Morris indicated that he would
like the Council to consider in the conditions regarding this property is to allow for screening and
solid fencing as is called by the Department of Code Enforcement for similar operations of this
nature. Mr. Morris would also like to see the use of water proof tarps to cover the storage
containers to prevent whatever debris that is stored does not run off and contaminate the ground
or run off into wells or city sewer and water. Mr. Morris would like to see limited hours of
operation and a limited number of storage containers on the site.
In rebuttal, Mr. Walz stated in response to limiting the waste to C and D materials (construction
and demolition waste), Junoll takes the position that they will only haul construction, demolition
and yard waste. Mr. Walz and his client Junoll want to be clear and straight forward in
mentioning what type of material will be hauled. As far as the transportation and truck noise,
this is a heavy industrial area, trucks are in and out of the adjacent properties as well and it is
their belief that they will not effect the truck traffic in anyway. Mr. Walz stated that they think
that they have worked out all the exceptions that were consistent with what has been discussed
and
-9-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
hopefully that we are to the point where those can be approved.
There was no one else present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition
to this Resolution.
Councilmember Puzzello asked the question, whether or not the landfill still accepts yard waste?
Mr. Bernard Voll, Junoll Industries, 27125 Tyler Rd., Walkerton, Indiana,business address -
1020/1022 S. Webster, South Bend, Indiana. Mr. Voll stated that there are two landfills that
still accept yard waste one is located in Elkhart, Indiana, and the other is located in Berrien
County, Michigan that also accepts yard waste.
Councilmember Pfeifer asked the petitioner when you bring the material to have it stored on the
property will it already be separated or will you have to separate it?
Mr. Voll stated that when they take orders from their clients, they ask them what kind of debris
they will be filling the containers with. Mr. Voll stated that they know ahead of time what kind
of waste they will be picking up. Mr. Voll stated that at no time will they do any separating of
waste on site.
Councilmember Coleman stated that he was concerned about the type of tarps that would be
covering the storage containers. He indicated that there is a legitimate amount of concern
regarding rainfall or any kind of precipitation then creating some run off. Councilmember
Coleman asked for further clarification on how the containers would be covered.
Mr. Voll stated that Junoll would put waterproof vinyl tarps on the containers. Mr. Voll also
stated that they are putting in a drywell drainage system onto the property that will catch any
drainage that might drain off.
Councilmember Kelly made a motion to adopt 2nd Substitute version of this Resolution with
conditions. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was
adopted by a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 3312-04 A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ADOPTION OF A
DECLARATORY RESOLUTION DESIGNATING
CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2309,
2315, 2503, 2513, 2525, 2537, 2603, 2310, 2402, 2432,
2502, 2512, 2524, 2536, 2548, 2608 AND 2620
EMERSON FOREST PARKWAY AS A
RESIDENTIALLY DISTRESSED AREA FOR
PURPOSES OF A FIVE (5) YEAR RESIDENTIAL REAL
PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR WOODHAVEN,
LLC
WHEREAS, a Statement of Benefits and a petition for residential real property tax abatement has
been submitted to and filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Common Council of the
City of South Bend, Indiana requesting that the areas commonly known as 2309, 2315, 2503,
2513, 2525, 2537, 2603, 2310, 2402, 2432, 2502, 2512, 2524, 2536, 2548, 2608 and 2620
Emerson Forest Parkway, South Bend, Indiana, and which are more particularly described as
follows:
Street Address Legal Description Key Number
2309 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#9 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-34
2315 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#11 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-32
-10-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
2503 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#48 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-27
2513 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#49 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-26
2525 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#50 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-25
2537 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#51 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-24
2603 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#52 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-23
2310 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#159 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-06
2402 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#160 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-07
2432 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot #163 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-10
2502 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot #195 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-11
2512 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#196 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-12
2524 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot #197 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-13
2536 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#198 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-14
2548 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#199 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-15
2608 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot #201 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-17
2620 Emerson Forest Parkway Lot#202 Emerson Forest Section One 18-8154-5545-18
be designated as a Residentially Distressed Area; and
WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of a Declaratory Resolution and the public hearing before the
Council has been published pursuant to Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-2.5; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing for the purposes of hearing all remonstrances and
objections from interested persons; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the qualifications for a residentially distressed area
have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
Indiana, as follows:
SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the petition for real property
tax abatement and the Statement ofBenefits form meet the requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1
et seq., for tax abatement.
SECTION II. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the area meets one of the
following conditions as formally established in Ordinance no. 8845-97, which was passed on
December 8, 1997:
A. The area is comprised of parcels that are either unimproved or contain only one (1)
or two(2)family dwellings designed for up to four(4)families, including accessory
buildings for those dwellings; or
B. Any dwellings in the area are not permanently occupied and are:
i. the subject of an order issued under IC 36-7-9; or
ii. evidencing significant building deficiencies; or
C. Parcels of property in the area:
i. have been sold and not redeemed under IC 6-1.1-24 and IC 6-1.1-25; or
ii. are owned by a unit of local government; or
D. A significant number of dwelling units within the area are not permanently occupied
or a significant number of parcels in the area are vacant land; or
E. A significant number of dwelling units within the area are:
i. the subject of an order issued under IC 36-7-9; or
ii. evidencing significant building deficiencies; or
F. The area has experienced a net loss in the number of dwelling units, as documented by
-11-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
census information,local building and demolition permits,or certificates of occupancy,
or the areas are owned by Indiana or the United States; or
G. The area (plus any areas previously designated under this subsection) will not exceed
ten percent (10%) of the total area within the Council's jurisdiction.
SECTION III. The Common Council also hereby determines and finds the following:
A. That the description of the proposed redevelopment meets the applicable standards for
such development.
B. That the estimate of the value of the redevelopment is reasonable for projects of this
nature;
C. That the other benefits about which information was requested are benefits that can be
reasonably expected to result from the proposed described redevelopment; and
D. That the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify the requested deduction, all of which
satisfy the requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-3.
E. The deduction will not be allowed unless the dwelling is rehabilitated to meet local code
standards for habitability.
F. The deduction will not be allowed unless the dwelling rehabilitation is completed within
five(5)calendar years from the date of the adoption of this Resolution by the Common
Council.
SECTION IV. The Common Council hereby confirms its Declaratory Resolution designating the
area described herein as a Residentially Distressed Area for the purposes of tax abatement. Such
designation is for Real property tax abatement only and is limited to five(5)calendar years from the
date of adoption of the Declaratory Resolution by the Common Council.
SECTION V. The Common Council hereby determines that the property owner is qualified for and
is granted Real property tax deduction for a period of five(5)years, and further determines that the
petition complies with Chapter 2, Article 6, of the Municipal Code of the City of South Bend and
Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq.
SECTION VI. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the
Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Karen L. White
Member of the Common Council
Mr. Bernard Feeney, Registered Land Surveyor, 715 S. Michigan Street, South Bend, Indiana,
made the presentation for this bill.
Mr. Feeney advised that the petitioner Woodhaven, LLC.,proposes to develop eighteen (18) .
stick-built family homes in Section One of the Emerson Forest Subdivision. The homes will be
one and two story homes and the average cost will be approximately$125,000.00.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to
this Resolution, Councilmember Puzzello made a motion to adopt this Resolution.
Councilmember Coleman seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by
a roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
-12-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
RESOLUTION NO. 3313-04 A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ADOPTION OF
A DECLARATORY RESOLUTION DESIGNATING
CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1309,
1325, 1329, 1405 & 1408 W. WASHINGTON
STREET AS RESIDENTIALLY DISTRESSED
AREAS FOR PURPOSES OF A FIVE (5) YEAR
RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY TAX
ABATEMENT FOR SOUTH BEND HERITAGE
FOUNDATION, INC.
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, has adopted a Declaratory
Resolution designating certain areas within the City as Residentially Distressed Areas for the
purpose of tax abatement consideration; and
WHEREAS, a Declaratory Resolution designated the area commonly known as 1309, 1325,
1329, 1405 and 1408 W. Washington St., South Bend, Indiana, and which are more particularly
described as follows:
Street Address: Legal Description: Key Number:
1309 West Washington Lot "E" SBHF Replat 18-1045-1960.01
1325 West Washington Lot "B" SBHF Replat 18-1045-1955
1329 West Washington Lot "A SBHF Replat 18-1045-1953
1405 West Washington Lot 2 Sarah J Stover's Sub 18-1048-2080.01
1408 West Washington Lot 2 Kirby's Sub of Bol 83 18-3075-2964
be designated as a Residentially Distressed Area; and
WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of a Declaratory Resolution and the public hearing before the
Council has been published pursuant to Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-2.5; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing for the purposes of hearing all remonstrances and
objections from interested persons; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the qualifications for a residentially distressed area
have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
Indiana, as follows:
SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the petition for real property
tax abatement and the Statement of Benefits form meet the requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1
et seq., for tax abatement.
SECTION II. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the area meets one of the
following conditions as formally established in Ordinance no. 8845-97, which was passed on
December 8, 1997:
A. The area is comprised of parcels that are either unimproved or contain only one (1)
or two (2) family dwellings designed for up to four(4)families, including accessory
buildings for those dwellings; or
B. Any dwellings in the area are not permanently occupied and are:
i. the subject of an order issued under IC 36-7-9; or
ii. evidencing significant building deficiencies; or
C. Parcels of property in the area:
-13-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
i. have been sold and not redeemed under IC 6-1.1-24 and IC 6-1.1-25; or
ii. are owned by a unit of local government; or
D. A significant number of dwelling units within the area are not permanently occupied
or a significant number of parcels in the area are vacant land; or
E. A significant number of dwelling units within the area are:
i. the subject of an order issued under IC 36-7-9; or
ii. evidencing significant building deficiencies; or
F. The area has experienced a net loss in the number of dwelling units, as documented by
census information,local building and demolition permits,or certificates of occupancy,
or the areas are owned by Indiana or the United States; or
G. The area (plus any areas previously designated under this subsection) will not exceed
ten percent (10%) of the total area within the Council's jurisdiction.
SECTION III. The Common Council also hereby determines and finds the following:
A. That the description of the proposed redevelopment meets the applicable standards for
such development.
B. That the estimate of the value of the redevelopment is reasonable for projects of this
nature;
C. That the other benefits about which information was requested are benefits that can be
reasonably expected to result from the proposed described redevelopment; and
D. That the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify the requested deduction, all of which
satisfy the requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-3.
E. The deduction will not be allowed unless the dwelling is rehabilitated to meet local code
standards for habitability.
F. The deduction will not be allowed unless the dwelling rehabilitation is completed within
five(5) calendar years from the date of the adoption of this Resolution by the Common
Council.
SECTION IV. The Common Council hereby confirms its Declaratory Resolution designating the
area described herein as a Residentially Distressed Area for the purposes of tax abatement. Such
designation is for Real property tax abatement only and is limited to five(5)calendar years from the
date of adoption of the Declaratory Resolution by the Common Council.
SECTION V. The Common Council hereby determines that the property owner is qualified for and
is granted Real property tax deduction for a period of five(5)years, and further determines that the
petition complies with Chapter 2, Article 6, of the Municipal Code of the City of South Bend and
Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq.
SECTION VI. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the
Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Karen L. White
Member of the CommonCouncil
Ms. Charlotte B. Sobel,South Bend Heritage Foundation,Inc.,803 Lincolnway West,South Bend,
Indiana made the presentation for this bill. Ms. Sobel advised that the development of these last 5
remaining lots will complete the project for this area. Ms. Sobel further advised that the homes will
be approximately 1,035 to 1,200 square feet, one and two stores, two-three bedrooms, two
bathrooms, full basements and some will have two car garages. Ms. Sobel advised the Council that
two car garages have become more desirable. The estimated value of the homes will be
approximately$85,000.00 to $95,000.00 per lot. The total cost for the new homes is estimated to
be $450,000.00.
-14-
•
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to this
Resolution, Councilmember Pfeifer made a motion to adopt this Resolution. Councilmember
Coleman seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of
nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 04-35 A RESOLUTION WAIVING CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
TO THE ADOPTION OF A DECLARATORY RESOLUTION
DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY
OF SOUTH BEND,INDIANA,COMMONLY KNOWN AS
3310 WILLIAM RICHARDSON COURT TO BE AN
ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES
OF A SIX (6) YEAR REAL PROPERTY TAX
ABATEMENT FOR TRINET ESSENTIAL FACILITIES
X, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF: CEQUENT TOWING j
PRODUCTS, INC.
BILL NO. 04-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND DESIGNATING CERTAIN
AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3310 WILLIAM
RICHARDSON COURT AN ECONOMIC
REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF A SIX(6)
YEAR REAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR
TRINET ESSENTIAL FACILITIES X INC., FOR THE
BENEFIT OF: CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS INC.
Councilmember Puzzello made a motion to combine these bill for purposes of Public Hearing.
Councilmember Kelly seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 3314-04 A RESOLUTION WAIVING CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO THE ADOPTION OF A
DECLARATORY RESOLUTION CERTAIN AREAS
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3310 WILLIAM
RICHARDSON COURT TO BE AN ECONOMIC
REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF A
SIX (6) YEAR REAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT
FOR TRINET ESSENTIAL FACILITIES X, INC., FOR
THE BENEFIT OF: CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS,
INC.
WHEREAS, TriNet Essential Facilities X, Inc., for the benefit of: Cequent Towing
Products, Inc. (the "Petitioner") filed a petition for real property tax abatement (the "Petition")
and a Form SB-1 statement of benefits with the South Bend City Clerk on March 17, 2004 for
consideration by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana (the "Common
Council"), requesting that the area commonly known as 3310 William Richardson Court, South
Bend, Indiana, and which has the parcel key number 25-1013-021605 (the "Property"), be
designated as an economic revitalization area under the provisions of Indiana Code sections
6-1.1-12.1-1 et seq., and South Bend Municipal Code sections 2-76 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner's contractor obtained a building permit on March 11, 2004,
and began rehabilitation (as defined by Indiana Code section 6-1.1-12.1-1(6)) of the Property on
or about March 11, 2004; and
-15-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
WHEREAS, the Common Council has adopted a policy requiring that petitioners for real
property tax abatement wait until after the Common Council has adopted a declaratory resolution
in accordance wit h Indiana Code section 6-1.1-12.1-2.5(b), before obtaining a building permit
and before initiating redevelopment or rehabilitation of real property; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner has presented substantial evidence to the Common Council
that circumstances beyond the Petitioner's control resulted in a building permit being issued and
rehabilitation of the Property commencing before the Common Council had adopted a
declaratory resolution, and the Common Council has concluded that such circumstances present a
compelling reason to waive the Common Council's policy;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South
Bend, Indiana as follows:
SECTION I. The Petitioner has presented testimonial evidence of the following facts and
the Common Council hereby makes the following findings of fact in support of this resolution:
A. The Petitioner made a good faith effort to notify all contractors to not initiate
rehabilitation activities until such time as the petition for tax abatement had been
considered by the Common Council.
B. Not withstanding these instructions, and unbeknownst to the Petitioner, the
contractor obtained a building permit on March 11, 2004 and initiated
rehabilitation activities on a portion of the project representing a cost of$12,800.
C. Upon discovery of the error, the contractor was immediately notified to cease
rehabilitation activities.
D. The Petitioner acknowledges and respects the long-standing policy of the
Common Council to require that the economic revitalization area declaratory
resolution be adopted by the Common Council before a building peiuiit is
obtained and before rehabilitation commences.
E. At all times throughout these proceedings, the Petitioner has acted in good faith,
has promptly cooperated with all requests of the Common Council and the South
Bend Department of Community and Economic Development, and has made
every effort to comply, to the best of its ability, with the requirements of law and
the policies of the Common Council.
F. Because the Petitioner made a good faith effort to comply , and it was only
discovered after the submission of the Petition for tax abatement that a permit was
pulled six days prior, and upon discovery of the error all rehabilitation activities
were immediately terminated, the Petitioner respectfully requests a waiver of the
requirement to first receive approval of a declaratory resolution by the Common
Council.
SECTION II. The foregoing facts, taken together, lead the Common Council to conclude
that sufficient reasons exist to waive noncompliance by the Petitioner with certain conditions
precedent to rehabilitation of the Property, in accordance with Indiana Code section
6-1.1-12.1-11.3, however, the Council excludes from this waiver the amount of$12,800 which is
the amount indicated on the building permit obtained on March 11, 2004.
SECTION III. The Common Council hereby waives such noncompliance, for the purpose
of permitting the Council to proceed with consideration of the Petition on its merits.
-16-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
SECTION IV. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption
by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Karen L. White
Member of the Common Council
RESOLUTION NO. 3315-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND DESIGNATING
CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH
BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3310
WILLIAM RICHARDSON COURT AN ECONOMIC
REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF A
SIX (6) YEAR REAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT
FOR TRINET ESSENTIAL FACILITIES X, INC., FOR
THE BENEFIT OF: CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS,
INC.
WHEREAS, a petition for real property tax abatement has been filed with the City Clerk
for consideration by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana requesting that the
area commonly known as 3310 William Richardson Court, South Bend, Indiana, and which is
more particularly described as follows:
Toll Road Industrial Park, Phase II: Section One, Lot One and
Section Two, Lot Two
and which has Key Number 25-1013-021605, be designated as an Economic Revitalization Area
under the provisions of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections
2-76 et seq.; and
WHEREAS,the Department of Community and Economic Development has concluded an
investigation and prepared a report with information sufficient for the Common Council to determine
that the area qualifies as an Economic Revitalization Area under Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1, et seq.,
and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2-76, et seq., and has further prepared maps and plats
showing the boundaries and such other information regarding the area in question as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, the Community and Economic Development Committee of the Common
Council has reviewed said report and recommended to the Common Council that the area qualifies
as an Economic Revitalization Area; and
WHEREAS,the Common Council has heretofore held a public hearing and granted a waiver
to the Petitioner pursuant to Resolution Number 3314-04 as to all but 512,800 of the project for
which portion Petitioner did not comply with Indiana Code 6.1-1-12.1-11.3(a)(3) .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South
Bend, Indiana, as follows:
SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the Petition for Real Property
Tax Abatement and the Statement of Benefits form completed by the Petitioner meet the
requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq., for tax abatement.
-17-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
SECTION II. The Common Council hereby determines and finds the following:
A. That the description of the proposed redevelopment or rehabilitation meets the
applicable standards for such development;
B. That the estimate of the value of the redevelopment or rehabilitation is reasonable for
projects of this nature;
C. That the estimate of the number of individuals who will be employed or whose
employment will be retained by the Petitioner can reasonably be expected to result
from the proposed described redevelopment or rehabilitation;
D. That the estimate of the annual salaries of those individuals who will be employed
or whose employment will be retained by the Petitioner can be reasonably expected
to result from the proposed.redevelopment or rehabilitation;
E. That the other benefits about which information was requested are benefits that can
be reasonably expected to result from the proposed described redevelopment or
rehabilitation; and
F. That the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify the requested deduction, all of
which satisfy the requirements of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-3, except that$12,800 of
the total assessed value of the property does not qualify for benefits due to
non-compliance with I.C. 6-1.1-12.1-11.3(a)(3).
SECTION III. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that the proposed
described redevelopment or rehabilitation can be reasonably expected to yield benefits identified in
the Statement of Benefits set forth as Sections I through II of the Petition for Real Property Tax
Abatement Consideration and that the Statement of Benefits foini prescribed by the State Board of
Accounts are sufficient to justify the deduction granted under Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-3.
SECTION IV. The Common Council hereby accepts the report and recommendation of the
Community and Economic Development Committee that the area herein described be designated as
an Economic Revitalization Area and hereby adopts a Resolution designating this area as an
Economic Revitalization Area for purposes of real property tax abatement,except for$12,800 of the
total assessed value for which Petitioner did not comply with I.C. 6-1.1-12.1-11.3(a)(3).
SECTION V. The designation as an Economic Revitalization Area shall be limited to two
(2) calendar years from the date of the adoption of this Resolution by the Common Council.
SECTION VI. The Common Council hereby determines that the property owner is qualified
for and is granted property tax deduction for a period of six (6)years, except for that portion of the
property tax deduction allocable to $12,800 of the total assessed value of the property.
SECTION VII. The Common Council directs the City Clerk to cause notice of the adoption
of this Declaratory Resolution for Real Property Tax Abatement to be published pursuant to Indiana
Code 5-3-1 and Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1-2.5,said publication providing notice of the public hearing
before the Common Council on the proposed confirming of said declaration.
SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption
by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
Councilmember Kelly made a motion to amend both Bill Nos. 04-35 and 04-36 as there were in the
committee meetings this afternoon. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by
-18-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22,2004
a voice vote of nine (9) ayes.
Councilmember Kelly,Chairperson,Community and Economic Development Committee,reported
that the committee met this afternoon and send both Bill Nos. 04-35 and 04-36 to the full council
with a favorable recommendation as amended.
Mr. John M. Haughton, Cequent, Manager of Logistics, and Project Manager, South Bend
Distribution Center,47774 Anchor Court W. Plymouth,Michigan made the presentation for these
Resolutions.
Mr. Haughton advised that TriNet Essential Facilities X(owner of the building),along with Cequent
Towning Products,propose to rehabilitate the building located at 3310 William Richardson Ct. The
facility will be leased to Cequent Towing Products. Cequent Towing Products is part of Cequent
Transportation Accessories Group which is a leading designer and manufacturer of a broad range
of accessories for light trucks, SUVs, recreation vehicles, passenger cars and trailers. Its
manufacturing operations are located in Goshen and Elkhart. The new South Bend distribution
center is part of the company's business strategy to consolidate manufacturing functions and
distribution functions into separate facilities. The total project cost is estimated to be$860,366. Mr.
Haughton further advised that this project will create eighty-three(83)new permanent jobs within
the first year, representing a new annual payroll of$1,959,198.00
Mr. Haughton explained that due to the issuance of a building permit prior to approval of the tax
abatement,has created the need for the waiver resolution. Mr. Haughton indicated that they made
a good faith effort to comply with the requirements,but unbeknownst to them the permit was pulled
by one of the contractors in the amount of approximately$12,000.00, on March 11, 2004.
Councilmember Kelly made a point of reference that the amount of the permit would not be
considered as a part of the tax abatement.
Councilmembers Kuspa and Dieter welcomed Trinet and Cequent to South Bend,and look forward
to working with them.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or opposition to this
Resolution, Councilmember Coleman made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 04-35, as amended.
Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll
call vote of nine (9) ayes.
Councilmember Coleman made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 04-36, as amended.
Councilmember Kelly seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll
call vote of nine (9) ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 3316-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA APPROVING AND
VOTING IN FAVOR OF AN ORDINANCE PROPOSED BY
THE ST. JOSEPH COUNTY INCOME TAX COUNCIL
INCREASING THE PERCENTAGE CREDIT ALLOWED
FOR HOMESTEADS IN ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend recognizes that the Indiana
Legislature has passed legislation which provides for the County Option Income Tax and allows,inc
connection therewith,for an increase in the percentage credit allowed for homesteads in counties in
which the county Option Income Tax is in effect; and
WHEREAS,the St. Joseph County Income Tax Council has approved the imposition of the
-19-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22,2004
County Option Income Tax in St. Joseph County and has determined that the imposition of this tax
should be accompanied by property tax relief in the form of an increase in the percentage credit
allowed for homesteads in St. Joseph County; and
WHEREAS, an ordinance to increase the homestead credit uniformly in St. Joseph County
has been proposed by one of the members of the St. Joseph County Tax Council and approved by
that member's governing body,pursuant to I.C.6-3.5-6-5,and it is in the best interests of the citizens
of South Bend that such ordinance be approved and that all of the City's votes on the St. Joseph
County Income Tax Council be cast in favor of the Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana approves and
casts its 40.59 votes for the proposed ordinance of the St. Joseph County Income Tax Council
which reads as follows:
AN ORDINANCE INCREASING THE PERCENTAGE CREDIT ALLOWED FOR
HOMESTEADS IN ST. JOSEPH COUNTY,INDIANA
The St. Joseph County Income Tax Council,pursuant to I.C. 6-3.5-5.6, has determined
that it will be in the public interest to increase the percentage allowed for homesteads in St.
Joseph County to provide property tax relief to the homeowners of St. Joseph County, Indiana.
The members of the St. Joseph County Income Tax Council are the South Bend
Common Council, Mishawaka, Common Council, the St. Joseph County Council, and other
local units.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ST. JOSEPH COUNTY INCOME
TAX COUNCIL OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA, as follows:
SECTION I. The St. Joseph County Income Tax Council hereby increases the
percentage credit allowed for homesteads in St. Joseph County under I.C. 6-1.1-20.9-2 as
follows:
For Real Property Taxes payable in 2005 and thereafter the percentage credit allowed for
homesteads in St. Joseph County in increased to the maximum amount allowed under the
formula stated in I.C. 6-3.5-6.13.
This shall take effect January 1, 2005.
SECTION II. If any part, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance is for any reason declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after January 1,
2005 upon its passage by the St. Joseph County Income Tax Council.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption
by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
s/Karen L. White
Member of the Common Council
-20-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Councilmember Dieter, Chairperson, Personnel and Finance Committee reported that the
committee met this afternoon regarding this bill and sends it to the full Council with a favorable
recommendation.
Mayor Stephen J. Luecke, 14th Floor County-City Building, South Bend, Indiana, made the
presentation for this bill.
Mayor Luecke informed the Council that this Resolution endorses the St. Joseph County Income
Tax Council to increase the percentage allowed for homesteads in St. Joseph County. This will
provide needed property tax relief to South Bend homeowners. Mayor Luecke further advised
that the process for increasing the homestead exemption is prescribed by Indiana statute and
requires approval of the members of the County Tax Council. The St. Joseph County Council
cast its 38.72 votes in favor of the Tax Council's homestead exemption ordinance by unanimous
(8-0) vote on March 9, 2004. The City of South Bend has 40.59 votes on the County Tax
Council, and the proposed Resolution casts all those votes in favor of increasing the homestead
exemption to its maximum level. Mayor Luecke stated that if this bill were in effect now, it
would have saved six and one-half(6 1/2) percent off the property tax bill.
A Public Hearing was held on the Resolution at this time.
There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to
this Resolution, Councilmember Varner made a motion to adopt this Resolution.
Councilmember Kelly seconded the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a
roll call vote of nine (9) ayes.
BILLS, FIRST READING
BILL NO. 20-04 FIRST READING ON A BILL TO VACATE THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THE
ALLEY TO BE VACATED IS THE FIRST EAST/
WEST ALLEY SOUTH OF WESTERN AVENUE
FROM MAIN STREET EAST TO THE FIRST
NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY FOR A DISTANCE OF
165 FEET AND A WIDTH OF 14 FEET. BEING
A PART OF MARTIN'S ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, ST. JOSEPH
COUNTY, INDIANA
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to refer this bill to the Public
Works and Property Vacation Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on
April 12, 2004. Councilmember Pfeifer seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of
nine (9) ayes.
BILL NO. 21-04 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
APPROPRIATING $16,000.00 INDIANA RIVER
RESCUE FUND (FUND #291)
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Puzzello made a motion to refer this bill to the
Health and Public Safety Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on April 12,
2004. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
-21-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
BILL NO. 22-04 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
APPROPRIATING $5,000.00 EMSCIF FUND (FUND
#288)
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer this bill to the
Health and Public Safety Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on April 12,
2004. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9)
ayes.
BILL NO. 23-04 FIRST READING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND TO
TRANSFER A PORTION OF KENNEDY PARK FROM
THE BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS TO THE
CIVIL CITY OF SOUTH BEND
This bill had first reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer this bill to the
Parks, Arts, Recreation and Culture Committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading
on April 12, 2004. Councilmember Kuspa seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of
nine (9) ayes.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
REPORT FROM THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION:
It is noted that the Council is in receipt of a recommendation from the Area Plan
Commission of St. Joseph County, for the following ordinance based on their Public
Hearing held on March 16, 2004:
BILL NO. 81-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
REPEALING AND REPLACING THE FOLLOWING
PROVISIONS OF THE SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL
CODE, NAMELY CHAPTER 21, ARTICLES 1
THROUGH 11, EXCLUDING ARTICLES 6.5 AND 8,
WITH THOSE ARTICLES NOT REPEALED BEING
RENUMBERED, AND THE INCLUSION OF NEW
ZONING MAPS, ALL OF WHICH SHALL BE
ENTITLED "THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND ZONING
ORDINANCE"
Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer this bill to the Zoning and Annexation
committee and set it for Public Hearing and Third Reading on April 12, 2004. Councilmember
Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes.
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business to come before the Council at this time.
PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
Mr. David Wickstrom, 55329 Apple Rd., South Bend, Indiana, Michiana Income Property
Owners Association, Inc., spoke regarding property taxes in St. Joseph County. He petitioned
the Council to sign their Resolution that they have prepared to send to the Indiana Legislature.
Mr. Wickstrom further noted that the recent property tax reassessment in St. Joseph County,
Indiana, has put undue financial hardship on the income property owners. The reassessment has
transferred the tax burden to the inner city and away from townships outside the city limits and
from large commercial and industrial properties, causing inner city property values to decline.
-22-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Mr. Wickstrom stated that the current application of the homestead and mortgage exemptions
has placed an unfair tax burden on non-owner occupied residential property and tenants. The
Petition by the Michiana Income Property Owners Association, Inc., states that they would like to
have a homestead deduction to residential rental property comparable to those available to owner
occupied homes. Provide older home credits to encourage investment and home ownership in
the inner city. Provide mortgage exemptions to residential rental property owners who have been
discriminated against in the past. Repeal the large corporation tax breaks enacted in 2002 and
provide residential rental property owners a share of the renters income tax deduction.
Ms. Penny Hughes, 1918 Southernview Dr., South Bend, Indiana, Secretary, Michiana Income
Property Owners Association, Inc., spoke regarding property taxes in St. Joseph County. Ms.
Hughes stated that her property taxes have jumped from $38,000.00 a year to $73,000.00 on five
(5) rental homes. Ms. Hughes noted that the reassessment took all of her profits for the year for
taxes. Ms. Hughes advised the Council that the landlords feel that their efforts to improve the
inner city haven't been appreciated very much.
Ms. Vicki Black, 26123 Brush Trail, South Bend, Indiana, advised that she and her husband buy,
renovate and sell property. She stated that there is no longer an incentive for them to invest
within Portage Township. Ms. Black informed the Council that many of her tenants are on
Section 8, and they will not allow her to increase rent to absorb the increase in the property tax.
She noted that the Resolution specifically requests special credits and exemption for rental
properties and older homes within City limits. Ms. Black asked the Council to sign their
Resolution and to take this issue seriously as it does affect the entire City of South Bend.
Mr. Donald Stante, 53123 Saint Abbs Ct., South Bend, Indiana, advised the Council that his
property taxes on his rental on Portage Avenue have gone from six hundred dollars ($600.00) to
two thousand six hundred dollars ($2,600.00) a year. Mr. Stante stated that if the State does not
allow tax credits to renters there will be a lot of homes in South Bend left empty. Mr. Stante
noted that he will sell his properties and get out of the business.
Ms. Linda Brammer, 3002 Miami Street, South Bend, Indiana, advised that Council that her
property taxes have increased ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) a year. She noted that the tax
increase is obscene and said that homeowners are afraid they will lose their homes. Ms.
Brammer stated that she is a stay at home mom with eight (8) children. She noted that with this
property tax increase it would make it virtually impossible to sell their home. She indicated that
the monthly taxes alone would be one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00)
Ms. Edi Mathis, 53222 Martin Lane, South Bend, Indiana, advised the Council that some
landlords may be forced to sell their rental homes to make ends meet. Ms. Mathis wondered
what impact this would have on the residential property values in the city as well as the County.
Mr. James English, 113 N. Ellsworth, South Bend, Indiana, member of the Michiana Income
Property Owners Association informed the Council that he is rehabbing houses with his sweat
and blood, and the State of Indiana and local government officials have kicked the ladder out
from underneath him.
Ms. Darlene Murdick, 53270 Placid Dr., South Bend, Indiana, Vice-President, Michiana Income
Property Owners Association, Inc., spoke regard the property tax increase. Ms. Murdick advise
the Council to look at what impact the property tax increase is having on the tax base in St.
Joseph County. Ms. Murdick stated that she pays quite a bit of property tax and with the large
increase, she feels that landlords will just have to sell their properties or walk away from them,
therefore, causing the tax base to fluctuate dramatically.
-23-
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 22, 2004
Mr. Paul Baranowski, 10153 Brummitt Rd., Granger, Indiana advised the Council that the
property tax appeal process keeps getting changed. Mr. Baranowski stated that when he contacts
the Assessor's Office, he is told to do something different each time. He feels very frustrated and
noted that the appeal process is just too complicated.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEXT MEETING DATE
Council President White advised that the next meeting of the Council will be held on Monday,
April 12, 2004.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, President White adjourned the
meeting at 8:50 p.m.
ATTE • ATT ST
_ 4111!Air — • "e A /
ohn V( orde, City erk K.r: L. White, President
-24-